Tt On Button
Started by devilsslide, Mar 23 2006 04:48 PM
12 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 23 March 2006 - 04:48 PM
Party Poker 0.50/1 Hold'em (9 handed) FTR converter on zerodivide.cx
Preflop: Hero is Button with T:club:, T:heart:.
UTG calls, 1 fold, MP1 calls, 2 folds, CO calls, Hero raises, 2 folds, UTG 3-bets, MP1 folds, CO folds, Hero caps, UTG calls.
Flop: (11.50 SB) 9:club:, 5:club:, 2:spade: (2 players)
UTG bets, Hero raises, UTG 3-bets, Hero calls.
Turn: (8.75 BB) 8:club: (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero bets, UTG calls.
River: (10.75 BB) 7:heart: (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks.
Final Pot: 10.75 BB
thoughts?
Preflop: Hero is Button with T:club:, T:heart:.
UTG calls, 1 fold, MP1 calls, 2 folds, CO calls, Hero raises, 2 folds, UTG 3-bets, MP1 folds, CO folds, Hero caps, UTG calls.
Flop: (11.50 SB) 9:club:, 5:club:, 2:spade: (2 players)
UTG bets, Hero raises, UTG 3-bets, Hero calls.
Turn: (8.75 BB) 8:club: (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero bets, UTG calls.
River: (10.75 BB) 7:heart: (2 players)
UTG checks, Hero checks.
Final Pot: 10.75 BB
thoughts?
#2
Posted 23 March 2006 - 04:51 PM
I'm not capping preflop.
Flop and turn seem alright.
I'm betting the river. This is missed overs or something weird a lot more often then its a hand that we're behind.
Flop and turn seem alright.
I'm betting the river. This is missed overs or something weird a lot more often then its a hand that we're behind.
#3
Posted 23 March 2006 - 05:07 PM
dont cap pf, hand plays different from there
Rise,
I like the whole hand. You should play drunk more often. :)
-Screech
I like the whole hand. You should play drunk more often. :)
-Screech
#4
Posted 23 March 2006 - 05:30 PM
Does UTG's three bet really show that much strength? I was thinking it was really weak.
Also, would cap be okay if game was really lag and there were a lot of callers, or is it still a call?
Also, would cap be okay if game was really lag and there were a lot of callers, or is it still a call?
#5
Posted 23 March 2006 - 05:43 PM
UTG's Limp Re-Raise (LRR) signifies he's either got AA/KK or he has 69 off suit
You never know. He probably hopes you fear him.
Bet the river
Also, you can always edit the hand to stop at a point before the end.
For instance, seeing he does not bet the turn or river after 3 betting the flop is odd, yet it biases us.
I'm 2 beers in.
You never know. He probably hopes you fear him.
Bet the river
Also, you can always edit the hand to stop at a point before the end.
For instance, seeing he does not bet the turn or river after 3 betting the flop is odd, yet it biases us.
I'm 2 beers in.
#6
Posted 23 March 2006 - 05:50 PM
QUOTE (Actuary @ Thursday, March 23rd, 2006, 8:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm 2 beers in.
That probably explains the following thread: http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...showtopic=54797
#7
Posted 23 March 2006 - 06:01 PM
QUOTE (SCS @ Thursday, March 23rd, 2006, 8:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
That probably explains the following thread: http://www.fullcontactpoker.com/poker-foru...showtopic=54797

Na, that was last night.
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#8
Posted 23 March 2006 - 06:04 PM
QUOTE (Zach6668 @ Thursday, March 23rd, 2006, 9:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Na, that was last night.
How many was it then?
#9
Posted 23 March 2006 - 06:06 PM
QUOTE (SCS @ Thursday, March 23rd, 2006, 9:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
How many was it then?
He just kept forgetting, but like 9 of 11 or something like that... the last hand he flops the nut straight with J9o vs my KQ top pair, I two paired up on the turn, and he wussed out and just called down...lol
QUOTE (serge @ Tuesday, May 12th, 2009, 7:20 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
LETS GO PITTSBURGH
QUOTE (Acid_Knight @ Monday, March 10th, 2008, 4:15 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Zach is right about pretty much everything.
#10
Posted 23 March 2006 - 06:08 PM
QUOTE (Actuary @ Thursday, March 23rd, 2006, 5:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
I'm 2 beers in.
you got catchin up to do
i didnt see it was a limp/reraise. i miss this stuff all the time. blah.
doesnt change much, though, IMO. it could be anything. AK, AA, J2s, 99, 34o
you'll have position on him HU after the flop, which makes this a call and not a cap, IMO.
Rise,
I like the whole hand. You should play drunk more often. :)
-Screech
I like the whole hand. You should play drunk more often. :)
-Screech
#11
Posted 23 March 2006 - 10:52 PM
QUOTE (RISEorFall @ Thursday, March 23rd, 2006, 6:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
doesnt change much, though, IMO. it could be anything. AK, AA, J2s, 99, 34o
you'll have position on him HU after the flop, which makes this a call and not a cap, IMO.
you'll have position on him HU after the flop, which makes this a call and not a cap, IMO.
Could this last statement be explained in more detail, ie why does position + HU = call and not cap (hey I am a math guy like actuary so equations are my language), but other scenarios might be a cap? I suppose having others in the pot means we want to be collecting their dead money, but where does position figure into this?
"A triangle with four points is what Euclid rides into hell"
#12
Posted 23 March 2006 - 11:01 PM
QUOTE (BuffDan @ Thursday, March 23rd, 2006, 10:52 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Could this last statement be explained in more detail, ie why does position + HU = call and not cap (hey I am a math guy like actuary so equations are my language), but other scenarios might be a cap? I suppose having others in the pot means we want to be collecting their dead money, but where does position figure into this?
i dont have math to back it up. i just dont cap 10 10, even against a limp/reraiser.
if his preflop skills are poor enough that he limp reraises in the first place, his post flop skills wont be any better, and we have position making that advantage over him even better.
if we were OOP, though a cap and flop bet could put more pressure on him.
Rise,
I like the whole hand. You should play drunk more often. :)
-Screech
I like the whole hand. You should play drunk more often. :)
-Screech
#13
Posted 23 March 2006 - 11:06 PM
Thank you, I didn't mean I wanted math to back it up neccesarily, I was actually just making a bad joke on the fact that I was writing an equation in my post...
"A triangle with four points is what Euclid rides into hell"
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









