BigDMcGee
Monday, April 23rd, 2007, 5:49 PM
QUOTE (bobbywithani @ Monday, April 23rd, 2007, 5:09 PM)

This argument is so flawed unless you are jewish. Living in a christian dominated society I am surprised that so many christians use eye for an eye as a basis for punishment. In the New Testament Jesus recanted on the Old Testament law and even specifically said to not go by an eye for an eye anymore.
No, you don't have to be jewish.. You can be an atheist, and believe that an eye for an eye is proper justice. It just makes you barbaric, in my mind.
The problem with "shadow of a doubt" is that in order to make sure, in order to be absolutely positive, you have to have exhaustive appeals. Even with them, wrongful convictions do occur. When I was attending Northwestern, the state of illinios, based on research and evidence brought forth by a Professor and his students, overturned two wrongful convictions of people on Death row, leading the state of Ill to suspend the death penalty ( I don't know how this turned out) Other cases of DNA and confessions of the real murderer, after the executions have taken place, have occurred. Innocent people, despite all these layers of appeal, have been put to death. In order to make the death penalty a successful deterrent, these layers of appeals will be stripped away, and more innocent people will die.
The fact is, there's no necessity for it. We are able to keep people out of society for entire lives, I don't understand why we need the extra revenge. A life time in jail, with no hope of ever being free, seems like a terrible punishment. However, I don't even care about the punishment aspect of it.. I just want these people out of society so they can't hurt anyone else.