Mostly posting as an example of playing 67 suited. Not saying I played it perfect.

In fact, could I have playing it better? Think I played the flop well.



Absolute Poker
Limit Holdem Ring game
Limit: $0.02/$0.04
6 players
Converter

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is CO with
UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls, Button raises, SB folds, BB calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls.

Flop: (10.5SB, 5 players)
BB bets, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, Hero calls, Button raises, BB calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 calls, Hero 3-bets, Button caps, BB calls, UTG calls, UTG+1 folds, Hero calls.

Turn: (14.25BB, 4 players)
BB checks, UTG bets, Hero raises, Button raises all-in $0.12, BB folds, UTG calls, Hero caps, UTG calls.

River: (25.25BB, 2 players + 1 all-in - Main pot: 23.25BB, Sidepot 1: 2BB)
UTG checks, Hero bets, UTG calls.

Results:
Final pot: 27.25BB

I would raise the flop immediately. If you have a read that the preflop raiser will always raise it, then ok, but in reality, when there's a lead and 3 calls, the PFR has to has a strong hand to raise here. I'm happy trapping the leader, and the 2 callers here. That's more than enough for me, AND, if button does have a strong hand, then he'll still call, or even 3-bet.

Turn and river are good though, IMO.

Yep. What Zach said.

I think the preflop raiser in a .02/04 game reraises a flop like this about 70 per cent of the time. In this case, my read was this guy was going to reraise about 95 per cent of the time. I put him on a big PP preflop and figured he'd raise regardless of the flop.

I am very happy with the comments though. Gives me something to think about.

thats news to me. low limits = passive.

I think this is bad.

Unless his stats are like 20/1, then it's impossible to put him on such a small range given just the PF action.