I don't think anyone is really arguing that Machida isn't a good striker. We are simply saying he's not exceptional. While he is elusive, he doesn't have good head movement and is sometimes flat footed. Also at times he keeps his hands a little low. The reason I like Sokoudjou's striking over Machida's is that he does have good head movement, his stance is wide meaning he can throw fast and powerful leg kicks and he's light on his feet. He also has nice power, the nog brothers have solid chins but he still flash KOed one of them. And his kicks are just f*cking sexy.
The thing is, I don't really like Ortiz and I am not a fan of his. I am a fan of Machida's, but when I try to analyze this match I just think that Tito takes it by UD. Stylistically he is just a bad match up for Machida.
Everything hinges on whether Tito can get the take down.
Here's why I think he can:
Tito has already fought a similar fighter to Machida: Wanderlei.
Here is what makes Wandy similar to Machida: He is a good striker and a black belt in BJJ.
Here is what makes them different: Wandy is a more powerful striker, Machida is a more technical striker. Machida's jits is better.
Wandy's main shortcoming is his wrestling. The people who give him problems are better strikers and strong wrestlers. Tito has beaten him, Arona has beaten him, Liddell, Hendo and Mirko. Basically, wrestler, wrestler, better striker with wrestling, striker with wrestling and better striker.
Tito's problems come from: strikers with good wrestling/TD defense and stronger wrestlers. This is why he has losses to Couture and Liddell.
Now let's look at Machida's past fights:
There is nobody on his resume that is similar to Ortiz. BUT, we have seen that he can be taken down. BJ Penn took him down and kept him there a decent amount, but Machida did get back up. We have seen Sokoudjou take him down, although he did get swept.
Here is something about Penn that is similar to Tito: he has good take downs.
Here is something about Tito that is different to Penn: he's 50lbs heavier.
Can Tito take him down? I think so.
Can Machida sweep Tito? I don't think so.
Can Machida get back up? I don't think so.
I want Machida to take it, but you have stated Tito is not the best match for Machida stylistically. So basically it boils down to this, if Tito is +170 and we lay $100 on Tito. Tito only has to win 37% of the time for it to be a good bet. Do I think Tito can win more than 37% of the time? Yeah I do.
The thing is, I don't really like Ortiz and I am not a fan of his. I am a fan of Machida's, but when I try to analyze this match I just think that Tito takes it by UD. Stylistically he is just a bad match up for Machida.
Everything hinges on whether Tito can get the take down.
Here's why I think he can:
Tito has already fought a similar fighter to Machida: Wanderlei.
Here is what makes Wandy similar to Machida: He is a good striker and a black belt in BJJ.
Here is what makes them different: Wandy is a more powerful striker, Machida is a more technical striker. Machida's jits is better.
Wandy's main shortcoming is his wrestling. The people who give him problems are better strikers and strong wrestlers. Tito has beaten him, Arona has beaten him, Liddell, Hendo and Mirko. Basically, wrestler, wrestler, better striker with wrestling, striker with wrestling and better striker.
Tito's problems come from: strikers with good wrestling/TD defense and stronger wrestlers. This is why he has losses to Couture and Liddell.
Now let's look at Machida's past fights:
There is nobody on his resume that is similar to Ortiz. BUT, we have seen that he can be taken down. BJ Penn took him down and kept him there a decent amount, but Machida did get back up. We have seen Sokoudjou take him down, although he did get swept.
Here is something about Penn that is similar to Tito: he has good take downs.
Here is something about Tito that is different to Penn: he's 50lbs heavier.
Can Tito take him down? I think so.
Can Machida sweep Tito? I don't think so.
Can Machida get back up? I don't think so.
I want Machida to take it, but you have stated Tito is not the best match for Machida stylistically. So basically it boils down to this, if Tito is +170 and we lay $100 on Tito. Tito only has to win 37% of the time for it to be a good bet. Do I think Tito can win more than 37% of the time? Yeah I do.
Problem with your analysis is Tito hasn't beaten anyone good in a long time. His fight with Griffin was 2 years ago and before Griffin has really improved. You're also comparing the Machida of 3 years ago to the Machida now when you mention the BJ Penn fight. He's improved a lot.
Machida was beating Soko standing, which is why he wanted to take the fight to the ground in the first place. He hurt Soko on multiple occasions, so he is starting to put some power behind his strikes more. He's just unorthodox and uses karate as his base rather than muay thai or kickboxing. His style works for him and I've never seen him take any damage, so it's hard to criticize what he is doing technically, because obviously he's doing something right.
Comparing Wandy to Machida is rediculous, they're total opposites. Wandy is a brawler that throws wide punches, but has KO power. Machida throws pin point strikes, while avoiding damage. Wandy's BJJ is fairly good defensively, but he uses his BJJ to nullify his opponent's attack and get back to his feet more than he does looking for submissions. Machida is way more technical in his ground game and will look for sweeps and submissions off his back.
I think most of you are underrating Machida's TD defense as well. Nakamura and Soko are world class judokas. It's a different takedown style than what Ortiz does, but those fights give you an idea that Machida is pretty good at stuffing takedowns. Even if it gets to the ground, Tito is good on top, but I doubt he does much damage, because I don't see him passing Machida's guard or even trying to for that matter.
I think the odds for this fight are about right.
