Game #2889709653: Omaha PL ($0.15/$0.25) - 2006/12/26 - 11:29:50 (DST)
Table "Clinker" Seat 6 is the button.
Seat 1: jeffss ($60.15 in chips)
Seat 2: Nofear001 ($24.75 in chips)
Seat 3: Tiltghost ($32.50 in chips)
Seat 4: Zawisza sits out
Seat 5: Dugp01012 ($20.35 in chips)
Seat 6: Devilson ($39.95 in chips)
Seat 7: Luckymoh ($21.83 in chips)
Seat 8: Torylight ($34.20 in chips)
Seat 9: TED18 ($8.35 in chips)
Seat 10: KongFisk sits out
Luckymoh: posts small blind $0.15
Torylight: posts big blind $0.25
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to jeffss [Jc Qc Qs Jh]
TED18: folds
jeffss: raises to $0.90
Nofear001: calls $0.90
Tiltghost: folds
Dugp01012: folds
Devilson: calls $0.90
Luckymoh: calls $0.75
QIzbyt joins the table at seat #4
Torylight: calls $0.65
----- FLOP ----- [Js 8h Kc]
Luckymoh: checks
Torylight: checks
jeffss: bets $4.50
TED18 sits out
Nofear001: calls $4.50
Devilson: folds
Luckymoh: folds
Torylight: folds
----- TURN ----- [Js 8h Kc][Qd]
jeffss: checks

I put him on 10 9 or a slowplayed KK.

I had only 8 outs for the board to pair.

Is checking weak here?

If you have him on KK, you only have two outs in the deck.

I think Smash used to say something to the effect of "low sets are for suckers"

Continually putting money in to a draw-heavy board, where you think you may already be drawing
virtually dead (in the case of KK) is recipe for disaster in plo.