checkymcfold
Wednesday, December 27th, 2006, 10:02 AM
QUOTE (akishore @ Tuesday, December 26th, 2006, 8:39 PM)

checky, can you elaborate here? I don't understand why I would want to shove on the flop if AAxx (esp with a low card) almost always calls here, but on most turns he might fold. and why do we have to fold a brick turn if it's a low card, e.g. this turn?
i'm not sure that AAxx without redraws would call here with a low card since he'd need to go running low for his backup. but i dunno, i didn't really work through the math with stack sizes and stuff. the key decision here would be whether you're going to play the hand straight up or try to figure out how to set up a bluff. straight up, i think i like pooooshing the flop since a pair with a weak redraw is about even money with AAxx weak redraw on a one low flop, and there's a fair amount of money in the pot already. and i really like the gambool.
the thing is that AAxx wouldn't know whether you're doing that with one pair (which would be an instacall obv), two pair (which would be close), two pair running low (which would also be close), two pair running nut low (probably a barely-fold without AA2x), a set (easy fold), or a huge draw of some kind (call or fold, depending). by shoving the flop, you're saying "i think you have AA, and now i win." you're then putting the villain to the test and forcing HIM to make the read and decision, and the value of doing that is difficult to quantify, but it is really +ev, especially if you know how to manipulate certain tendencies in a 4-card game over a long-ish session.
by just calling the flop you're looking like either a set that wants to wait till the turn (which happens much less than a draw) or a draw. the problem is that most people will assume the latter, and if the turn comes off a brick then they'll generally think AA just got helped out a ton and be willing to fight for the pot. but that part is player-dependent enough for me not to quibble with your decision to play the hand as you did. personally, i shove the flop, but that's a stylistic thing that i got good at manipulating over the course of a lot of hands. there are definitely multiple ways of beating plo8, and i'm definitely not saying you're "wrong" in any way. i just do it differently is all. hope i explained why adequately above.
QUOTE
the bold part made me laugh. reraising with 5678 ds is clearly a losing play, but you are right that i would want to get out of the game if the player was good enough to be able to do that AND make money consistently. yikes.
aseem
ha, when i play plo8 i play about 80% of my hands, sometimes literally every non-trips hand at some tables, and sometimes raising/reraising every time. in deepstacked situations, i very often pot/repot EVERY hand preflop to **** with people--5678ds would look like a monster for me in a lot of spots, lol. i also make money

.
i learned that style from playing plo8 with leggggggggy on UB a lot a while back. he crushed me for a while, till i figured out what he was doing and started to emulate his style, which is very similar to what i do now. we then kinda just stayed away from each other and bled everyone else dry. if he still plays the 5/10 game on UB, give it a look sometime. i definitely learned a lot by logging a lot of hands with him, but it's kinda hard to explain what i got out of all that in specific terms. basically, you can make people uncomfortable to the point where they'll start pushing too hard with really vulnerable holdings and you'll be paying a preflop pot bet every hand to basically have your choice of which hands to play for all the money postflop. super, super, super +ev, but also a lot of variance.