Shimmering Wang
Friday, December 15th, 2006, 12:04 AM
QUOTE (Actuary @ Friday, December 15th, 2006, 2:05 AM)

I'm not saying I"m an expert on this idea; but you realize it's ok to bet even when you expect to be an underdog when called, as long as you are less of an underdog when called, than when you check/call, right. Or said better, you assume he calls with a wider range than he bets ?
That assumes we are not bluff raised.
But it also helps eliminate the bad fold when we don't want to overcall and we are good 1/13 times.
And, given we lose 1 BB but may win 2 sometimes, I think betting here is more important than betting HU. Also, we are less likely to get a bluffer here to bet for us. (which you'd fold often to anyway depending on other action and who's left to act)
Betting river >>> Checking. Yes?
I'd love more input.
If I'm playing against complete unknowns (which is usually the case, because I'm rarely conscious) I play the flop like this, then check the turn. Actually,
fuck that... I'd rather try to check/raise the flop OOP, depending on how aggressive our opponents are. Kx hands are coming along, and we'd like an LP player to bet so we can knock AxXx or QxXx hands to muck, not to mention random draws. If the action comes back bad, we can probably get away.
We got called in 3 spots on the flop, and we're fading a ton of outs to the river.
I don't hate betting this turn into the field, but I don't love it, either. I'll probably have to think about it. (think think) Dammit, I bet the turn. I'd rather see the hand played with a flop c/r, but- given action- I bet the turn, too. Seems like we're getting smoked by a random king much of the time, but if we get Aces and Queens to fold when we're ahead, it's a good bet. (Which is whhy I like check/raising the flop, BTW). Plus we have to charge lame draws, middle pairs, bottom pairs, and super crappy hands that have no bussiness hanging around.
Anyway.
Wang