monix
Thursday, September 21st, 2006, 6:41 AM
QUOTE (FCP Info @ Thursday, September 21st, 2006, 6:20 AM)

Hi Monix, I'll send you a PM about your specific situation.
Bob, as always I appreciate your prompt, patient and courteous service. Without that I would have left long ago.
QUOTE (FCP Info @ Thursday, September 21st, 2006, 6:20 AM)

I want to bring up some general troubleshooting things that players can do that may help with some of these issues.
The bigger issue is the responsiveness that OnGame provides FCP as their customer. The OnGame client is bloated and poorly executed. For example, they use a database approach to hand histories in an attempt to provide additional functionality in analysis. However:
1) HH reporting capability (what is stored on the local hard drive) is less than that provided by the other major sites,
2) The analysis provided is lame and redundant as I suspect that virtually anyone who reviews their HH’s use a third party analysis tool such as Poker Tracker.
While I agree that the disconnection and contention for the same bandwidth is at the root of these issues, the other sites have “lighter” applications that put fewer demands on the system and bandwidth and have more robust reconnection routines.
I love the FCP Forum, the community, but the OnGame environment makes it tough to play on FCP.