NOFX_PUNK
Tuesday, September 19th, 2006, 3:42 PM
Does anyone save the river bets?
PokerStars Game #6346820239: Tournament #32191504, $32+$3 Razz Limit - Level IV (60/120) - 2006/09/19 - 19:36:54 (ET)
Table '32191504 1' 8-max
Seat 1: Weisshaupt (1281 in chips)
Seat 2: ! JP 1950 ! (858 in chips)
Seat 3: NOFX_PUNK (1680 in chips)
Seat 4: motox245 (2103 in chips)
Seat 5: ILE4EV (1784 in chips)
Seat 6: bdubs3737 (1468 in chips)
Seat 7: CashCookie (1430 in chips)
Seat 8: the waźden (1396 in chips)
Weisshaupt: posts the ante 12
! JP 1950 !: posts the ante 12
NOFX_PUNK: posts the ante 12
motox245: posts the ante 12
ILE4EV: posts the ante 12
bdubs3737: posts the ante 12
CashCookie: posts the ante 12
the waźden: posts the ante 12
*** 3rd STREET ***
Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac]
Dealt to ! JP 1950 ! [As]
Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah]
Dealt to motox245 [4d]
Dealt to ILE4EV [5s]
Dealt to bdubs3737 [Qc]
Dealt to CashCookie [8s]
Dealt to the waźden [Td]
bdubs3737: brings-in low 18
CashCookie: folds
the waźden: folds
Weisshaupt: calls 18
! JP 1950 !: calls 18
NOFX_PUNK: raises 42 to 60
motox245: calls 60
ILE4EV: calls 60
bdubs3737: folds
Weisshaupt: calls 42
! JP 1950 !: folds
*** 4th STREET ***
Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac] [Tc]
Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah] [2c]
Dealt to motox245 [4d] [8h]
Dealt to ILE4EV [5s] [Kd]
NOFX_PUNK: bets 60
motox245: calls 60
ILE4EV: calls 60
Weisshaupt: calls 60
*** 5th STREET ***
Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac Tc] [6h]
Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah 2c] [8d]
Dealt to motox245 [4d 8h] [7c]
Dealt to ILE4EV [5s Kd] [Qh]
NOFX_PUNK: bets 120
motox245: calls 120
ILE4EV: folds
Weisshaupt: calls 120
*** 6th STREET ***
Dealt to Weisshaupt [Ac Tc 6h] [6d]
Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d] [Kc]
Dealt to motox245 [4d 8h 7c] [8c]
NOFX_PUNK: bets 120
motox245: calls 120
Weisshaupt: calls 120
*** RIVER ***
Dealt to NOFX_PUNK [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d Kc] [Jd]
NOFX_PUNK: bets 120
motox245: calls 120
Weisshaupt: raises 120 to 240
NOFX_PUNK: raises 120 to 360
motox245: folds
Weisshaupt: raises 120 to 480
Betting is capped
NOFX_PUNK: calls 120
*** SHOW DOWN ***
Weisshaupt: shows [2s 7s Ac Tc 6h 6d 4h] (Lo: 7,6,4,2,A)
NOFX_PUNK: shows [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d Kc Jd] (Lo: 8,5,3,2,A)
Weisshaupt collected 2412 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 2412 | Rake 0
Seat 1: Weisshaupt showed [2s 7s Ac Tc 6h 6d 4h] and won (2412) with Lo: 7,6,4,2,A
Seat 2: ! JP 1950 ! folded on the 3rd Street
Seat 3: NOFX_PUNK showed [5c 3d Ah 2c 8d Kc Jd] and lost with Lo: 8,5,3,2,A
Seat 4: motox245 folded on the River
Seat 5: ILE4EV folded on the 5th Street
Seat 6: bdubs3737 folded on the 3rd Street
Seat 7: CashCookie folded on the 3rd Street (didn't bet)
Seat 8: the waźden folded on the 3rd Street (didn't bet)
dingas
Tuesday, September 19th, 2006, 10:24 PM
QUOTE (NOFX_PUNK @ Tuesday, September 19th, 2006, 4:42 PM)

Does anyone save the river bets?
Yes, it is not likely that you are getting raised here by anything that you beat. Just make the crying call.
NoChip4You!
Wednesday, September 20th, 2006, 7:47 AM
In my opinion with 8-low and knowing the villain is looking to make or break his hand on the river, I would be inclined to check and see his reaction. If he doesn't make his hand then he will likely check back. If he does make his hand he will likely bet and you could easily make that call.
Without knowing more about the players involved or any possible reads you might have, I think the check-call would have been the best route with 8 low. All the 8s were out on the board or dead, so he is pretty much chasing a 7 considering you were showed to be coming down on an 8 yourself. Perhaps I am a little more cautious than some, however.
scottyno
Wednesday, September 20th, 2006, 8:34 AM
Im ok with the bet on 7th because theres the 3rd player in the hand that is going to pay you off with a worse 8 like he tried to do before he got priced out by you two capping it up. Theres no way the 3rd guy can be raising with a hand that doesnt have you beat, since even if you're bluffing with nothing the guy in the middle clearly has a weak 8 made and if you dont call he certainly will and even if you do call he might so a bluff has 0 chance of working. I suppose there is a very slim chance that he made a strong 86 and is hoping you have a 6 or 7 down, but with 3 8s already dead this is unlikely. Your 3 bet is terrible since his range of hands he can have that you're beating is almost nothing and theres a decent chance he caps it (though his cap with a 76 low is a very thin raise). Since the 3rd player is in I might even fold the hand on 7th because Im that sure he cant possibly be bluffing, and I certainly wouldn't raise, most of the time I would probably make the crying call. Oh, and if for whatever reason I decide to be suicidal and I 3 bet and then he caps it over the top just fold your hand because you have 0 chance in a million that you have him beat in a $32+3 sng unless its clear that he doesnt know at all what hes doing like the people you see sometimes in the first level or 2 that are capping with pairs showing and showdown full houses, but by the 60-120 level you should know if hes one of these players or not.
NOFX_PUNK
Wednesday, September 20th, 2006, 1:33 PM
to be fair he was a terrible player and I was multi tabling so the 3 bet was a reaction rather than a thought. Plus it left me with about 1k to play with. Annoyingly the same dude won another ridiculous pot putting him at like 5.5k and he sat out until 3 handed leaving me the bubble when the other short(er) stack doubled up.
HangukMiguk
Wednesday, September 20th, 2006, 8:54 PM
yeah, i'm with scotty on this one. you played the hand fine the whole way down up until 7th. i certainly don't check/call 7th, but i certainly don't 3-bet it either. bet/call is the correct play here.
myxomatosized
Saturday, September 23rd, 2006, 11:08 PM
i would check rasie 6th and check call 7th
scottyno
Sunday, September 24th, 2006, 1:58 AM
QUOTE (myxomatosized @ Sunday, September 24th, 2006, 3:08 PM)

i would check rasie 6th and check call 7th
checkraise isnt going to work, everyone bricked on 6th, if either of them was going to play his hand fast they would have already raised it on 5th, checking 6th just gives both of them free cards to draw out on you instead of making them pay to draw
myxomatosized
Sunday, September 24th, 2006, 6:47 PM
QUOTE (scottyno @ Sunday, September 24th, 2006, 2:58 AM)

checkraise isnt going to work, everyone bricked on 6th, if either of them was going to play his hand fast they would have already raised it on 5th, checking 6th just gives both of them free cards to draw out on you instead of making them pay to draw
i could see the made 87 (if he actually has a made 87) bet fifth if we check after pairing our 8. our check says "oops. paired my eight. i'm still drawing, guys i'm not gonna try to steal this pot anymore." if the 87 thinks we don't feel like drawing anymore, he'll bet here.
if we check after hitting a nice card, it would look suspicious and they'd probably check. but i find that, especially against weaker oponnents, they can be tricked into betting (even if they still have a draw) if you check after hitting a brick telling them you've been representing more strength than you actually have the entire time, and now you've given up.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.