David_Nicoson
Wednesday, August 30th, 2006, 6:41 PM
QUOTE (Dubey @ Wednesday, August 30th, 2006, 7:30 PM)

some info might be incorrect with regards to exact number of limpers as I am doing this from memory.
Passive table, 3 limpers, Hero limps in LP with Q

J

, button limps, both blinds complete.
Flop Q

J

9
EP bets 15, Villain calls 15, hero raises to 50, button calls all-in for 45, folds to EP who folds, Villain re-raises to 100.
Villain had only been at the table for a round and a half, but he hadn't played a hand yet. How easy is this to fold?
oh, Hero had $120 or so left after the $50 raise, Villain has $30 behind after the $100 raise.
There's another $30 left to play? That's not an easy fold at all. Assuming the $30 is going in, then before our call:
Pot = 14 + 15+ 50 + 45 + 100 + 30 = 254
We need to call a total of $80 to see the river, so our pot odds are:
254:80 = 3.2:1
We're ****ed if we're up against JJ or QQ. You described our opponents as passive, not dead, so I think that's pretty unlikely. So neglecting those cases, we can still win by hitting a full house even
if we are behind. And I do think we're ahead occasionally. The odds against our 4 outs coming through on the turn or river are 5:1. That's worse than 3.2:1, so we would have to fold if we knew we were behind. How often? I find that piece of math is easier to do with percentages.
The total pot after we're all-in is 254+80=334. When we're behind to a hand like a straight, we win 16.5% of the time. Our equity is $334 x 0.165 = $55. We spent $80 for this equity, so we lose $25 when we're behind to the villain.
Supposing we're ahead of the villain but the all-in player has us beat, our equity in the main pot is still about 16.5%.
I worked out a spreadsheet, hoping to come to a definitive opinion. And I have: the spreadsheet was way more trouble than in was worth.
Using some wild-*** guesses, I figure we lose $1.66 by calling here. If we're ahead more often than 25% of the time, we can make money.