gaddyjr
Monday, August 28th, 2006, 10:14 AM
QUOTE (DonkSlayer @ Monday, August 28th, 2006, 8:26 AM)

I think a few people putting the villain on a strong draw are ignoring that our villain, to whom our Hero gives a lot of credit for being a tough player, led on the turn.
This was the first thing that threw me off. I was totally anticipating a check, to which I was going to push.
QUOTE (Big_B_Killer @ Monday, August 28th, 2006, 5:22 AM)

He knows you are not on a flush draw because your raise shows that you made a hand.
This is what made the fact that he led the turn so intriging. After seeing my reraise on the flop, I think the minimum he could put me on would be two pair or maybe AA. He knows that I think I have the best hand.
By that logic, would it follow that he would only push if he wanted to be called?
After the action on the flop I thought I had to put him on a monster draw. I took the weak lead to be a way of building a pot and hoping to get the next card cheap. The big drawing hands here would be:
8h9h, Qh9h, KhQh, AhQh, or AhKh.
Because he had shown the ability reraise preflop, even OOP, I ruled out A

K

. While 8

9

made sense preflop, it didn't after his bet on the turn.
Therefore, only Q

9

, K

Q

, and A

Q

seemed plausible. I am drawing to four outs against two of those hands and if it is K

Q

I would have to dodge 20 outs on the river.
This is the thought process that led me to fold. Anyone see any flaws? Did I give the Villain too much credit?
He did show his hand which I will reveal after a little more discussion.