copernicus
Sunday, August 20th, 2006, 5:26 AM
QUOTE (CobaltBlue @ Sunday, August 20th, 2006, 6:03 AM)

I understand the principle, but nothing to be said for trying to fold better aces/small pairs with an aggressive check-raise semi-bluff? My problem with my raise and the stack sizes is that it puts me in a sticky spot. If I'd raised less, I think I could fold. If I'd raised more, I'd certainly have to go with it. I put myself somewhat on the fence.
I ended up pushing and he called, showing TT. I failed to improve. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't playing badly in being willing to take the gamble in this spot.
If you semi-bluff with a board that clearly cant have a made hand yet, the caller includes your semi-bluff hands in his assesment of your range. Lets say he puts you on Ax of spades down to 7, AJ+, TT+,KQ, plus a "Harrington10% pure bluff margin".
That makes TT and any smaller pair thats not already a set a 55:45 favorite, and the small Aces that arent paired about 2:1 dogs. Overall the range of hands you are trying to get to fold sees themselves as a 55:45 dog (including the 10% bluff possibility) . His immediate odds are 1.8:1 and his all-in implied odds are 1.3:1. You have very little chance of chasing the hands that you mentioned even with a push.
Overall I would actually have put you as a 1.5:1 favorite, so a push might have had a chance for success, but anything else would almost certainly be called.
I think you should have waited for the turn card if youre going to gamble at all.