This thread probably has zero potential.
Anyway, nonbelievers say believers are blind, believers say its the other way around. So who is right?
Present your reasons for believing the other party is wrong. Stupid reasons will be ridiculed and dismissed.
Obviously I think believers are blind. They blindly follow a book that was written ~1400 years ago 600 years after the main character lived. There is evidence of stories in this book being altered, yet some believers take every word to be true. Also, there are many inconsistencies in the book which modern day science can show is overwhelmingly false. Also, I can't think of one advancement society has made in the past 1000 years that religion hasn't tried to hold backk.
Ridicule me if you think I'm stupid. Argue with me if you think I kinda make sense, but not as much as you. And support me/help present a better arguement (Canada), if you agree with me.
