CO (t2000)
Button (t2200)
SB (t1960)
BB (t2000)
UTG (t2000)
UTG+1 (t2000)
UTG+2 (t2000)
Hero (t2000)
MP2 (t1840)
MP3 (t2000)
Preflop: Hero is MP1 with 3
, 3
. UTG calls t40, 1 fold, UTG+2 raises to t180, Hero calls t180, 4 folds, SB calls t160, 1 fold, UTG folds.
Flop: (t620) A
, 4
, K
(3 players)SB checks, UTG+2 checks, Hero bets t400, SB calls t400, UTG+2 folds.
Turn: (t1420) 7
(2 players)SB checks, Hero is all-in for 1420.
This is from the second hand of a SnG. Obviously, there were reads involved or I wouldn't have played the way I did. Here's my thinking on every street:
Preflop: That larger than normal raise is QQ, JJ, or TT 90% of the time. I'll call and play for set value.
Flop: Well, I did put the raiser on QQ, JJ, or TT. This wouldn't be a bad time to try a position bet.
Turn: OK, when I got called, I was absolutely ready to throw in the towel. The SB obviously has an ace or better, so it's time to give up. Right? Well, on the turn, the SB made the universal signal for "I have a hand, please don't bet into me" by stalling for about five or six seconds before checking. It did seem pretty weird that he didn't go for the C/R on the flop, and I figured that the most likely thing was that he was legitimately weak. $215 SnG players are usually able to lay down hands if they think they're beat, and there's no way he can put me on a bluff, especially when I could easily be trying to push out a flush draw on the turn. I figure that if I push, the bluff only has to work 52% of the time to show a profit, and at this point, I figure it's way higher than that.
Thoughts?
