David_Nicoson
Tuesday, June 13th, 2006, 9:24 PM
QUOTE (nomad_monad @ Wednesday, June 14th, 2006, 12:55 AM)

Doesn't this mean we might as well push against the initial raise instead of reraising to ~23 since we can't really fold against another raise? What is the value of reraising without pushing?
If our opponent is drawing, we might discourage him from calling. He'd like to see that money still in your stack to pay him after he hits rather than part of his cost to the turn.
I don't think pushing is a bad option, but it's not a given.
QUOTE
Also, if we reraise to ~23 and just get flat called and the turn blanks, we're really stuck having to lead again for the rest of our stack with only one card to come. Finally, a flop push prices out a naked Ks draw.
I'll just offer up that a min raise from a naked K

is a horrible, horrible play in NL.
QUOTE
Given the fact that we're being offered better than 4-1 on the flop, it seems like you could make a case for just calling the initial raise here if you want to play it more conservatively. But the decision really seems to be between calling or pushing.
Essentially. A raise on the flop commits your stack to the hand.
QUOTE
What concerns me here, however, is that the villain minraised and basically invited you to draw. If he's a decent opponent, does he do this with anything less than the K of spades?
I don't play any hand like the villain did, but I suspect he has the nuts.