CoranMoran
Wednesday, May 24th, 2006, 1:48 PM
What are we hoping for when we simply complete with this?
22 is not a hand that is going to improve.
Playing it for set value heads up isn't a good play.
So push it while you have an advantage.
And that is preflop.
QUOTE
i don't think deuces are a good completing hand
since there are virtually no good flops for you, the fold equity from raising preflop (either by getting the BB to fold preflop or on the flop) is the reason you can play the hand at all.
Yes Indeedy!
QUOTE (Verdimme @ Saturday, May 20th, 2006, 4:01 PM)

Look at it this way: BB has any two cards..if you check to the BB on the flop..they will bet 99% of the time. They miss the flop 2/3 of the time..so I figured I'm probably good here.
People miss 2/3 of random flops.
People will certainly
not miss this coordinated flop 2/3 of the time.
Any 5,6,7,8,9,T caught a piece.
And all face cards remain overcards.
And Flush draws exist.
It seems that the only hands that do not connect with this flop at all are 43, 42, 32.
So as has already been mentioned, there is no need to bluff this flop.
Another thing I don't understand is the inconsistency between your preflop and flop decisions.
When you decide to passively limp preflop, why would you then choose to aggressively bluff check-raise the flop?
Wouldn't you have a lot more fold equity if you had just raised before the flop and then made a continuation bet?
--cm