FullMontyM1
Saturday, April 15th, 2006, 4:36 AM
QUOTE (Phlatline @ Friday, April 14th, 2006, 7:45 AM)

I don't get it. How is enclosing players in a dome going to change anything? I would imagine they are trying to put a new spin on televised poker but I fail to see how this would make viewing more exciting. Frankly the audience should never come into play anyway. I guess maybe they want to prevent players from getting up and walking around during a hand, similar to what we see on the WPT every week. In my opinion, the players should have to remain seated until they are finished with the hand, in the WPT or otherwise.
Sorry to be negative, but I just don't see this idea really taking off.
Phlat_________

I don't like a bunch of monkey business during a critical hand either, but I think people should do what they think they should do when it's real money at stake.
I personally think a bunch of activity during a hand is more likely to give your opponent a read than not.
The issue reminds me of Scotty Nyguen's WSOP win a decade or so ago, when his HU opponent got up and went to the bathroom after he went all in during a critical, late-stage hand.
Nyguen called him on the hand and lost, but ended up winning the tourney, and managed to use some monkey business of his own to induce a call on the end.
Anyways, I thought Nyguen's opponent leaving the room to take a leak during that hand was pretty classless. Though, I did think, from watching the event on TV, that his total disinterest in the outcome of the hand and his general demeanor indicated a lot of strength.
Btw, Poker Dome sounds cheesy.
Monty
PS The krablar dance is exempted from my general distaste for excessive extra-curricular activity during poker.