50+5 SNG on Party Poker..
6 of us left, blinds at 200/400 and I have the button. I have slightly over 5000k. I wake up to 3d 3s...2 callers to me and I call as does the small blind. Small pocket pair with so many in so I just call...a mistake?
FLOP: 3h 7d Ac
Small checks, big blind bets 1200k, #4 seat calls, #5 seat folds. I raise to 2400k, small blind folds, big blind calls. #4 and #5 fold.
TURN:
3c
QUADS......I bet 1000k, big blind pushes all-in. YAHTZEE I think. I call immediately. His cards are revealed....7c 7h for the boat.
RIVER: 7s
No chip lead, no coasting to first, nothing, nada, zip, zilch, zero....UGH.
Party Poker Big Blind special
Dave
Full Version: Party Poker Special
QUOTE (Daves99GT @ Tuesday, March 21st, 2006, 9:04 AM) 
50+5 SNG on Party Poker..
6 of us left, blinds at 200/400 and I have the button. I have slightly over 5000k. I wake up to 3d 3s...2 callers to me and I call as does the small blind. Small pocket pair with so many in so I just call...a mistake?
FLOP: 3h 7d Ac
Small checks, big blind bets 1200k, #4 seat calls, #5 seat folds. I raise to 2400k, small blind folds, big blind calls. #4 and #5 fold.
TURN:
3c
QUADS......I bet 1000k, big blind pushes all-in. YAHTZEE I think. I call immediately. His cards are revealed....7c 7h for the boat.
RIVER: 7s
No chip lead, no coasting to first, nothing, nada, zip, zilch, zero....UGH.
Party Poker Big Blind special
Dave
6 of us left, blinds at 200/400 and I have the button. I have slightly over 5000k. I wake up to 3d 3s...2 callers to me and I call as does the small blind. Small pocket pair with so many in so I just call...a mistake?
FLOP: 3h 7d Ac
Small checks, big blind bets 1200k, #4 seat calls, #5 seat folds. I raise to 2400k, small blind folds, big blind calls. #4 and #5 fold.
TURN:
3c
QUADS......I bet 1000k, big blind pushes all-in. YAHTZEE I think. I call immediately. His cards are revealed....7c 7h for the boat.
RIVER: 7s
No chip lead, no coasting to first, nothing, nada, zip, zilch, zero....UGH.
Party Poker Big Blind special
Dave
tough beat, I would have called to try and hit my set but then someone else may say we are both wrong.
QUOTE (sixhands @ Tuesday, March 21st, 2006, 12:27 PM)
tough beat, I would have called to try and hit my set but then someone else may say we are both wrong.
its a fine call. only problem is "2400K" which means 2,400,000. you just mean 2400 or 2.4K.
also, you should not have minimum raised that flop with two callers in between. either smooth-call or raise more (probably all-in).
but nothing was stopping that beat. back-to-back one-outers. that's pretty cold.
while i'm nit-picking. to the above poster, please edit your signature. only Jesus and Confucious are allowed to quote themselves. you can just write it without quoting. it is not so brilliant that you need to attribute it to yourself.
QUOTE (mrdannyg @ Tuesday, March 21st, 2006, 10:49 AM)
its a fine call. only problem is "2400K" which means 2,400,000. you just mean 2400 or 2.4K.
also, you should not have minimum raised that flop with two callers in between. either smooth-call or raise more (probably all-in).
but nothing was stopping that beat. back-to-back one-outers. that's pretty cold.
while i'm nit-picking. to the above poster, please edit your signature. only Jesus and Confucious are allowed to quote themselves. you can just write it without quoting. it is not so brilliant that you need to attribute it to yourself.
also, you should not have minimum raised that flop with two callers in between. either smooth-call or raise more (probably all-in).
but nothing was stopping that beat. back-to-back one-outers. that's pretty cold.
while i'm nit-picking. to the above poster, please edit your signature. only Jesus and Confucious are allowed to quote themselves. you can just write it without quoting. it is not so brilliant that you need to attribute it to yourself.
Wake up to 3-3?!?!?! That shitty hand better get me coffee to wake up with...
QUOTE (mrdannyg @ Tuesday, March 21st, 2006, 10:49 AM)
its a fine call. only problem is "2400K" which means 2,400,000. you just mean 2400 or 2.4K.
also, you should not have minimum raised that flop with two callers in between. either smooth-call or raise more (probably all-in).
but nothing was stopping that beat. back-to-back one-outers. that's pretty cold.
while i'm nit-picking. to the above poster, please edit your signature. only Jesus and Confucious are allowed to quote themselves. you can just write it without quoting. it is not so brilliant that you need to attribute it to yourself.
also, you should not have minimum raised that flop with two callers in between. either smooth-call or raise more (probably all-in).
but nothing was stopping that beat. back-to-back one-outers. that's pretty cold.
while i'm nit-picking. to the above poster, please edit your signature. only Jesus and Confucious are allowed to quote themselves. you can just write it without quoting. it is not so brilliant that you need to attribute it to yourself.
Thank you for the decent request this time to change my signature. Had you requested the change this way originally it would have been done by now.
I did not change it because you said it was effin annoying and quite frankly what you said made me want to annoy you further.
Thank you for your feedback
EDIT: what the f#ck am I thinking, why should I change my signature because you don't like it, if you don't like it tough, deal with it
QUOTE (sixhands @ Tuesday, March 21st, 2006, 3:04 PM)
Thank you for the decent request this time to change my signature. Had you requested the change this way originally it would have been done by now.
I did not change it because you said it was effin annoying and quite frankly what you said made me want to annoy you further.
Thank you for your feedback
EDIT: what the f#ck am I thinking, why should I change my signature because you don't like it, if you don't like it tough, deal with it
I did not change it because you said it was effin annoying and quite frankly what you said made me want to annoy you further.
Thank you for your feedback
EDIT: what the f#ck am I thinking, why should I change my signature because you don't like it, if you don't like it tough, deal with it
i didn't mean to insult you - i thought it was pretty obvious that someone actually bothering to quote themselves in their signature was doing so absurdly. if you really feel your quote was so brilliant that you need to defend it against people copying it and not attributing it to you, then by all means quote it.
and the bolded portion is self-apparent. this is how i deal with it...feel free to ignore me completely.
all you kids out there - "it's alright to be self-effacing if you also happen to be obviously correct" - Daniel.
Daniel
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.