nopunk
Monday, February 27th, 2006, 6:33 PM
QUOTE (DonkSlayer @ Monday, February 27th, 2006, 1:02 PM)

Interesting idea but naive to a fault.
1) If you don't encounter these "situations" that will "teach" you in your daily life, then you wont' be exposed to it and thus be unable to apply those lessons later in life.
2) It doesn't allow for any disccovery by the children into what they like/are good at...for instance, a child may never be exposed to architectual engineering if he/she lives on a farm, but may have a knack/love for it if they are in fact exposed to it.
3) When students are exposed, they won't have the means beyond the actual circumstance they learned from to apply it to future occurrences. For instance, they are exposed to geometry while painting a room, but while they will be able to figure out exactly how much paint they need to cover a wall, they won't be able to know WHY it works out that way, and thus will have to be re-taught every time a new geometric problem crops up, vs having the base knowledge to figure it out if possible.
Just my 2 cents.
QFT
Hippies.
To think this would work is rediculous.
Without doing a lot of research, I can tell you that 95% of the children I have been around wouldn't do shit if they didn't have to.
My Case