screech
Saturday, January 21st, 2006, 8:51 AM
QUOTE
For those that are saying don't raise pf if there's 4 callers behind you at all times, wasn't there a theory on this poker forum (propsed by sreech a couple months ago i think), saying even though you only hit ur set 1 in like 6.5, you can profitably raise all pocket pairs, even if those limpers are ahead of you, because what you lose in an equity edge you can make up in implied odds?
I think people we're saying raise like 55 with 4 limpers ahead of you when ur on the bb.
Does everyone not like this theory anymore?
I think you need to have at least 5 limpers to make this work.
And the answer is, it depends.
If your raise is more likley to get people to chase when they're drawing slim, or generate any other excessive action that a small pot wouldn't generate, then raising is best.
If your opponetns still chase with crap and mindlessly throw in bets and raises with mediocre hands anyway, calling is best.
The more I think about it, the more I think calling is best in most situations. That's because loose/passives will call down anyway, and weak/tight's will fold anwyay.
So the only players I see this strategy working will against are TAG's or LAGs. In most situations, I think it is better to limp unless you're getting 7:1 on your raise.