econ_tim
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 10:42 AM
or anyone who plays in a game with a 1/3 SB structure:
what is your winrate from the SB??
what was your winrate from the SB in 2/4??
please give sample sizes and specify whether your stats are for full ring or short handed
screech
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 11:11 AM
I don't know my exact win rate from sb because I don't have internet at my house, and that's where my pt is. Overall, at 6-max, my winrate from sb is either 0.02 or 0.04. I can't remember which. (I looked at it the other day). About 60% of those hands are from 3/6.
I don't think your winrate from teh sb should change that much in the 1/3 structure because you adjust. Same reason why your winrate doesn't really change much in the 2/3 structure. In fact, I think your winrate from the sb should increase as the sb amount decreases. This only makes sense because it costs more to play from the bb than it does when you put no money in the pot.
In case you're wondering how to play the sb, just pretend you're on the button. That strategy seemed to work pretty well for me.
econ_tim
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 11:51 AM
QUOTE (screech)
I don't know my exact win rate from sb because I don't have internet at my house, and that's where my pt is. Overall, at 6-max, my winrate from sb is either 0.02 or 0.04.
If your winrate is positive, you either run good or play in really good games.
I agree that your winrate from the SB should increase as the SB decreases. That is why I wanted to know winrates in 1/2 and 1/3 structures.
screech
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 12:01 PM
QUOTE (econ_tim)
QUOTE (screech)
I don't know my exact win rate from sb because I don't have internet at my house, and that's where my pt is. Overall, at 6-max, my winrate from sb is either 0.02 or 0.04.
If your winrate is positive, you either run good or play in really good games.
I agree that your winrate from the SB should increase as the SB decreases. That is why I wanted to know winrates in 1/2 and 1/3 structures.
It was negative. I run good, but not that good.
I'll check my winrates at 1/2 vs 3/6 when I go home. One thing that should be considered is that my winrate was much higher at the 1/2 structure, which will affect my winrate from the sb methinks.
screech
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 2:38 PM
tim,
do you know how to get pt to seperate the different levels in the same db
Zach6668
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 3:01 PM
QUOTE (screech)
tim,
do you know how to get pt to seperate the different levels in the same db
Preference tab.
Zach6668
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 3:04 PM
I've only played 2734 hands at 3/6 full ring, and only 314 hands from the SB. My winrate is (0.03) BB/hand.
As for my 1/2 structured limits, it's (0.16) over 2054 hands from the SB, 17,298 total hands at the .5/1, 1/2, and 2/4 levels.
Zach
screech
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 3:25 PM
Thanks zach.
I set these stats for when 4-6 players are in the pot.
For 1/2 6, I am -0.06BB from sb over 1237 hands.
For 3/6 6, I am -0.04BB from the sb over 6171 hands.
Hope this helps.
Zach6668
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 3:31 PM
QUOTE (screech)
Thanks zach.
I set these stats for when 4-6 players are in the pot.
For 1/2 6, I am -0.06BB from sb over 1237 hands.
For 3/6 6, I am -0.04BB from the sb over 6171 hands.
Hope this helps.
Screech, if you play at Party, the levels should also be divided between say 1/2, and 1/2 6 Max, so you can simply use that as a way to divide them as well.
Zach
screech
Tuesday, January 10th, 2006, 3:50 PM
QUOTE (Zach6668)
QUOTE (screech)
Thanks zach.
I set these stats for when 4-6 players are in the pot.
For 1/2 6, I am -0.06BB from sb over 1237 hands.
For 3/6 6, I am -0.04BB from the sb over 6171 hands.
Hope this helps.
Screech, if you play at Party, the levels should also be divided between say 1/2, and 1/2 6 Max, so you can simply use that as a way to divide them as well.
Zach
way ahead of you zach. I use seperate db's for ring and short games. :-)
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.