econ_tim
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 6:10 PM
2/4 six max
I open with QQ in the CO, Button raises, blinds fold, I 3-bet, and button caps.
Flop is AK6 rainbow.
I bet, Button raises, I 3-bet, Button caps, I fold.
Button is unknowable.
He might think I am maniac because I have been raising a lot preflop and I also showed down some less that stellar hands.
who prefers bet/folding the flop?
who openfarrells?
who needs more insanity sauce?
Sysvr4
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 6:45 PM
I prefer a check/raise/fold line on the flop. You put in fewer bets for the same information.
Edit - And if it's anything like Dave's Insanity Sauce, I'll pass.
Jeff
KDawgCometh
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 6:56 PM
QUOTE (Sysvr4)
I prefer a check/raise/fold line on the flop. You put in fewer bets for the same information.
or just bet/fold on the flop, even less bets for the same info. what u havev recomended and what tim did are both spews all things considered
Sysvr4
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 7:04 PM
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
QUOTE (Sysvr4)
I prefer a check/raise/fold line on the flop. You put in fewer bets for the same information.
or just bet/fold on the flop, even less bets for the same info. what u havev recomended and what tim did are both spews all things considered
Nah, not the same at all.
A lot of people raise this flop with pocket pairs trying to determine your strength. It doesn't necessarily take an A or a K. I think very few opponents 3-bet or cap without one.
Jeff
fckthis
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 7:43 PM
QUOTE (Sysvr4)
I prefer a check/raise/fold line on the flop. You put in fewer bets for the same information.
Edit - And if it's anything like Dave's Insanity Sauce, I'll pass.
Jeff
Same line I would use.
KDawgCometh
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 7:47 PM
QUOTE (Sysvr4)
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
QUOTE (Sysvr4)
I prefer a check/raise/fold line on the flop. You put in fewer bets for the same information.
or just bet/fold on the flop, even less bets for the same info. what u havev recomended and what tim did are both spews all things considered
Nah, not the same at all.
A lot of people raise this flop with pocket pairs trying to determine your strength. It doesn't necessarily take an A or a K. I think very few opponents 3-bet or cap without one.
Jeff
at 2/4 6? you're kidding right. It was capped PF, therefore limiting the range of hands that the villian could have, almost all of which hit that board(minus JJ). So why on earth would we want to spew a BB just to fold. THis is an easy bet/fold, maybe check/fold, anything else is wasting bets big time
Limit Player
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 7:49 PM
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
QUOTE (Sysvr4)
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
QUOTE (Sysvr4)
I prefer a check/raise/fold line on the flop. You put in fewer bets for the same information.
or just bet/fold on the flop, even less bets for the same info. what u havev recomended and what tim did are both spews all things considered
Nah, not the same at all.
A lot of people raise this flop with pocket pairs trying to determine your strength. It doesn't necessarily take an A or a K. I think very few opponents 3-bet or cap without one.
Jeff
at 2/4 6? you're kidding right. It was capped PF, therefore limiting the range of hands that the villian could have, almost all of which hit that board(minus JJ). So why on earth would we want to spew a BB just to fold. THis is an easy bet/fold, maybe check/fold, anything else is wasting bets big time
agreed
Abbaddabba
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 8:03 PM
You know what i just realized?
You limp raised with queens from the CO.
Smasharoo
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 8:14 PM
You know what i just realized?
You limp raised with queens from the CO.
I do that against agressive blinds all the time.
Well, a lot anyway.
good luck.
Smasharoo
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 8:15 PM
Oh and getting 16 to 1, I'd call the flop.
Nothings funnier than wining this with a runner runner straight.
good luck.
zimmer4141
Sunday, January 8th, 2006, 8:26 PM
Yeah, once you are capped, no reason to fold the flop getting 16 to 1. Like Smash said, always hilarious to spike a Q and get someone on tilt.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.