Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: playing three pair..response requested..
FCP Poker Forum > Poker Strategy Forum > No Limit Texas Hold'em Cash Games
DrawingDeadInDM
Here's another one..let me know..I still want responses..

For these purposes, players will be typical TAG.

2/4 NL

Relevant Stacks
UTG: 350
CO: 400
Small blind: 200
Hero: 550

Bottom two from the blinds..

Playing three pair out of position..

UTG, CO, Small Blind all call, we're in the big blind with 4 icon_suit_diamond.gif 2 icon_suit_club.gif , Hero checks.

Pot: 16 dollars
Flop: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif

SB checks, Hero..?

Our play here is to go for a check/raise or to lead out and bet. I prefer, personally to check/raise. This can go sour though, very quickly. For our purposes, we'll lead out.

SB checks, Hero bets 15, UTG folds, CO calls, SB folds.

It's very unlikely the CO is on any kind of draw. It's likely a hand like QJ or KJ. He's a tight player that has shown down quality hands and uses his position effectively.

Pot: 46 Dollars
Turn: 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Hero..?

This a relatively safe card. It's possible CO had 99, but unlikely. This being a safe card, I like to check/raise. I think this is our opportunity to lay the hammer down. Worst case scenario, river comes a Q or K, or, god forbid a J.

Hero checks, CO bets 25, Hero raises..? I think this where we bring the heat. There's 96 in the pot, I think we need to take it to 100, making him pay 75 more to catch. For our purposes, CO bets 25, Hero raises to 100, CO smooth calls 100.

It's very likely we have the best hand right now. CO wouldn't be playing J9, would've raised with Jacks, and is very unlikely to be holding 99. J4, J2, 24, and 92 are all out of the question.

Pot: 246
River; J icon_suit_heart.gif
Final board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif J icon_suit_heart.gif

Well, that couldn't have been a worse card. We're now beat by any J(which is a likely holding, KJ, QJ), any 9, and most any 4 and really any pocket pair.

Our play on the river is..?

Questions I'd like to know the answers to.

Your thoughts on the river play?

Do you bet more or less on any of the streets?

Do we slow down on the turn at all, expecting a call?

Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?

Is check raising the flop a more viable play, hoping to take it down there..?

Do you lead out the river if it gets checked behind on the turn?

Do you lead out on the turn again? Or is the check/raise viable?
macphec
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM)
Here's another one..let me know..I still want responses..

For these purposes, players will be typical TAG.

2/4 NL

Relevant Stacks
UTG: 350
CO: 400
Small blind: 200
Hero: 550

Bottom two from the blinds..

Playing three pair out of position..

UTG, CO, Small Blind all call, we're in the big blind with 4 icon_suit_diamond.gif 2 icon_suit_club.gif , Hero checks.

Pot: 16 dollars
Flop: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif

SB checks, Hero..?

I like leading out here for $12 or so and I'm not dissapointed if I take it down here or get one call or get raised. If I get raised I'm gonna reraise. We almost certainly have the best hand right now and need ro make villian pay yo draw to his 5 outer. I find that if we lead here we are more likely to get raised by AJ, KJ, QJ, or even J10.


Our play here is to go for a check/raise or to lead out and bet. I prefer, personally to check/raise. This can go sour though, very quickly. For our purposes, we'll lead out.

SB checks, Hero bets 15, UTG folds, CO calls, SB folds.

It's very unlikely the CO is on any kind of draw. It's likely a hand like QJ or KJ. He's a tight player that has shown down quality hands and uses his position effectively.

Pot: 46 Dollars
Turn: 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Hero..?

I like a check raise here too. We are pretty sure we still have the best hand and it tells the villian that we took a shot at the flop (w a weak J possibly or even 2nd pair) and are now ready to give it up. I want to be pretty sure villian will bet out here if I check though. He may check behind with something like J10.

This a relatively safe card. It's possible CO had 99, but unlikely. This being a safe card, I like to check/raise. I think this is our opportunity to lay the hammer down. Worst case scenario, river comes a Q or K, or, god forbid a J.

Hero checks, CO bets 25, Hero raises..? I think this where we bring the heat. There's 96 in the pot, I think we need to take it to 100, making him pay 75 more to catch. For our purposes, CO bets 25, Hero raises to 100, CO smooth calls 100.

It's very likely we have the best hand right now. CO wouldn't be playing J9, would've raised with Jacks, and is very unlikely to be holding 99. J4, J2, 24, and 92 are all out of the question.

Pot: 246
River; J icon_suit_heart.gif
Final board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif J icon_suit_heart.gif

Well, that couldn't have been a worse card. We're now beat by any J(which is a likely holding, KJ, QJ), any 9, and most any 4 and really any pocket pair.

Our play on the river is..?

Questions I'd like to know the answers to.

Your thoughts on the river play?

I think there is no question that we have to give up on the river. I don't know if that's too weak but if we bet we are bluffing off a bunch of chips to a guy who most likely just made trips. We will most definitly have to fold to a raise and villian will only lay down hands like 88, 77 if we make a big enough bet. I'm not prepared to risk more chips with now a nothing hand in this spot. I think we have to ask ourselves what hand can villian be holding that he will fold here after calling 2 big relative bets on the flop and turn. The answer is not many. We certainly do not get villian to fold enough times to make it a profitable play.

Do you bet more or less on any of the streets?

I like your betting amounts on all streets

Do we slow down on the turn at all, expecting a call?

No, I jam the turn b/c we think we still have the best hand.

Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?

I am comfortable building this size pot heads up with 2 pair on this board. Villian's range of holdings do not support us being beat until the river

Is check raising the flop a more viable play, hoping to take it down there..?

I think it's very close between leading out and c/r on the flop. I mentioned above that there is a good chance we get raised with a worse hand if we lead out here. Check raising will win a smaller pot but our hand is vunerable so maybe that is a good thing. I think with this board we can afford to build a big pot OOP.

Do you lead out the river if it gets checked behind on the turn?

Nope, I check fold this river because the pot is not nearly big enough now given the check check on the turn.

Do you lead out on the turn again? Or is the check/raise viable?


Both are viable to me. You might lose someone with a weak J (ie J10) if you lead. I like the check raise.


These are great exercises. Please keep them coming and I'm going to try and add more to this forum as I just moved up to $2 $4 NL on Party. Very little live experience as I live in Eastern Canada.
RhinestoneCowboy
Personally, I would lead out on the flop because it would be very difficult to put me on 2 pair. Maybe I am playing my hand too strongly, but I would probobly lead out on the turn as well. The jack on the river is a very scary card and I would probobly check/fold.

On 2nd thought, fold preflop laugh.gif laugh.gif
JSHamm
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM)
Here's another one..let me know..I still want responses..

For these purposes, players will be typical TAG.

2/4 NL

Relevant Stacks
UTG: 350
CO: 400
Small blind: 200
Hero: 550

Bottom two from the blinds..

Playing three pair out of position..

UTG, CO, Small Blind all call, we're in the big blind with 4 icon_suit_diamond.gif 2 icon_suit_club.gif , Hero checks.

Pot: 16 dollars
Flop: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif

SB checks, Hero..?

Our play here is to go for a check/raise or to lead out and bet. I prefer, personally to check/raise. This can go sour though, very quickly. For our purposes, we'll lead out.

SB checks, Hero bets 15, UTG folds, CO calls, SB folds.

It's very unlikely the CO is on any kind of draw. It's likely a hand like QJ or KJ. He's a tight player that has shown down quality hands and uses his position effectively.


Given CO is a TAG, why would he only call with QJ or KJ instead of raising to protect his hand or gain information from you? This is something I'd expect from a more passive player (based on the fact I've seen no other hands with the CO. Limping in pre-flop behind two others would either indicate, to me, high connectors (suited or not) or a low to mid pocket pair. He doesn't like the Jack but maybe isn't giving you credit for it either, yet.

QUOTE
Pot: 46 Dollars
Turn: 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Hero..?

This a relatively safe card. It's possible CO had 99, but unlikely. This being a safe card, I like to check/raise. I think this is our opportunity to lay the hammer down. Worst case scenario, river comes a Q or K, or, god forbid a J.

Hero checks, CO bets 25, Hero raises..? I think this where we bring the heat. There's 96 in the pot, I think we need to take it to 100, making him pay 75 more to catch. For our purposes, CO bets 25, Hero raises to 100, CO smooth calls 100.

It's very likely we have the best hand right now. CO wouldn't be playing J9, would've raised with Jacks, and is very unlikely to be holding 99. J4, J2, 24, and 92 are all out of the question.


There's actually $71 in the pot, not $96, after the CO bets $25. I think I like the $100 overbet of the pot, but would we gain any more or any less information by only betting the pot of say $75. Correct me if I'm wrong, but betting $100 into a $71, he'll have to call $75 more, giving him 2.28 to 1, but betting $75 into a $71 he'll have to call $50 more, giving him 2.92 to 1. (It's monday morning, my math can atrocious right now.)
Actually, after going through it I guess I do like the bet; however, I think I'd lead with a pot sized bet on the turn (say $50) and see how the CO reacts. Still going with your play, though...

QUOTE
Pot: 246
River; J icon_suit_heart.gif
Final board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif J icon_suit_heart.gif

Well, that couldn't have been a worse card. We're now beat by any J(which is a likely holding, KJ, QJ), any 9, and most any 4 and really any pocket pair.


That is one of the worst cards for us. Now we're OOP with a river that I'm sure counterfeits our original two pair. The CO was not scared by our flop bet (or was only calling - mid pocket pair again? just seems more likely there). Still came along for our check-raise (gives reason to believe at least holding a J with a mid kicker (10 Q K maybe). All his actions to this point indicate he hit something or is holding something in his hold cards that he's not thrilled about but isn't scared to come along either. How much do we really beat here? Our equity has dropped considerably (87% ish to 68%. Against a LAG I may be coaxed into betting but how much? $246 in the pot and my stack is at $431, the CO at $281. I just can't see how we can bet (knowing the CO) and having him fold when he came this far. To me, he has either two holdings - A jack or mid pocket pair. So, either he's definitely not folding to any river bet holding a jack or he may be coerced into folding a mid pocket pair once that river jack hits. A pot sized bet would commit a little over half your stack in a case where you're not sure you're ahead or not (and I don't thing you are). The CO hasn't shown any aggression, though, so perhaps a half-pot bet may induce a call or have him fold. If it's reraised back I think it'll be for your whole stack and you may have to let it go..(ughhh...). I think checking is just hand the hand to him, though, and what can you call with there?
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (JSHamm)
There's actually $71 in the pot, not $96, after the CO bets $25. I think I like the $100 overbet of the pot, but would we gain any more or any less information by only betting the pot of say $75.


Just, FYI, the 96 is based on our, raising TO 100. Meaning, we've called his 25 already, and raised 75 more. We're betting 100 into a pot of 71.

I'm not real clear if that's what you're saying, or if you're saying we should've raised to 125?



I'm gonna wait for some more responses before I answer these myself.
JSHamm
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM)
QUOTE (JSHamm)
There's actually $71 in the pot, not $96, after the CO bets $25. I think I like the $100 overbet of the pot, but would we gain any more or any less information by only betting the pot of say $75.


Just, FYI, the 96 is based on our, raising TO 100. Meaning, we've called his 25 already, and raised 75 more. We're betting 100 into a pot of 71.

I'm not real clear if that's what you're saying, or if you're saying we should've raised to 125?



I'm gonna wait for some more responses before I answer these myself.


Nah, sorry if that was confusing. I was under the assumption that after the flop play the pot was $46. We check and the CO bets $25, giving us a total of $71 before our action. I didn't take into account the assumed call before we raised anymore.
JSHamm
I'm bumping this...for the love of participation
macphec
I'm surprised at the lack of responses to this.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (macphec)
I'm surprised at the lack of responses to this.


Still plenty of time in the day..If there's not a few more responses by this afternoon, I'll be surpised.

If it doesn't get more responses, I'll just save myself the time, ya know?
Chief
[quote=DrawingDeadInDM]
Bottom two from the blinds..

Playing three pair out of position..

This can go sour though, very quickly. For our purposes, we'll lead out.
[/quote]

yes you get a gold star

[quote]
It's very unlikely the CO is on any kind of draw. It's likely a hand like QJ or KJ. He's a tight player that has shown down quality hands and uses his position effectively.

Pot: 46 Dollars
Turn: 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif

Hero..?

This a relatively safe card. It's possible CO had 99, but unlikely. This being a safe card, I like to check/raise. I think this is our opportunity to lay the hammer down. Worst case scenario, river comes a Q or K, or, god forbid a J.

Hero checks, CO bets 25, Hero raises..? I think this where we bring the heat. There's 96 in the pot, I think we need to take it to 100, making him pay 75 more to catch. For our purposes, CO bets 25, Hero raises to 100, CO smooth calls 100.
[/quote]

100 is about the max id go. why not just bet out on the turn? like 50 or 60?

[quote]
It's very likely we have the best hand right now. CO wouldn't be playing J9, would've raised with Jacks, and is very unlikely to be holding 99. J4, J2, 24, and 92 are all out of the question.

Pot: 246
River; J icon_suit_heart.gif
Final board: 2 icon_suit_heart.gif 4 icon_suit_club.gif J icon_suit_spade.gif 9 icon_suit_diamond.gif J icon_suit_heart.gif

Well, that couldn't have been a worse card. We're now beat by any J(which is a likely holding, KJ, QJ), any 9, and most any 4 and really any pocket pair.
[/quote]

Your thoughts on the river play?
check/fold unless i dont put him on the jack in which case i bet half his remaining stack
Do you bet more or less on any of the streets?
i bet out on the turn, if i dont get counterfeited on the river and a decent river falls i might check raise all in.
Do we slow down on the turn at all, expecting a call?
on that turn no
Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?
be selective. depends on the opponent.
Is check raising the flop a more viable play, hoping to take it down there..?
depends on the opponent.
Do you lead out the river if it gets checked behind on the turn?
yep.
Do you lead out on the turn again? Or is the check/raise viable?[/quote]

the check raise is viable, but i still worry him hitting his 8 outer (pairing his kicker, the board pairing unfavorably either with his pair or another card), id bet as much as i can for value.
petersun
I think you played the hand well.

The flop bet is appropriate since your hand is disguised.

I like the check/raise on the turn since it indicates real strength. His call concerns me, but I can see someone with AJ making that call (esp. if it was in an unraised pot and he was slow playing the AJ). Bottom two pairs have this habit of become counterfitted, so being aggressive on the flop and turn are appropriate.

On the river, it's pretty clear a check/fold. I feel like you don't need to lead out here since a check can mean a variety of things (including strength).
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (JSHamm)
Given CO is a TAG, why would he only call with QJ or KJ instead of raising to protect his hand or gain information from you? This is something I'd expect from a more passive player (based on the fact I've seen no other hands with the CO.  Limping in pre-flop behind two others would either indicate, to me, high connectors (suited or not) or a low to mid pocket pair.  He doesn't like the Jack but maybe isn't giving you credit for it either, yet.


I don't think most TAGs raise with QJ here, KJ, maybe if they lean to the side of loose.

Do you think being the Villain in this hand, you'd call the flop with say, 88 or 77? If you did, what would your play be on the turn and river? When the jack comes do you bet when checked to? Do you check behind?

QUOTE
That is one of the worst cards for us.  Now we're OOP with a river that I'm sure counterfeits our original two pair.  The CO was not scared by our flop bet (or was only calling - mid pocket pair again? just seems more likely there).  Still came along for our check-raise (gives reason to believe at least holding a J with a mid kicker (10 Q K maybe).  All his actions to this point indicate he hit something or is holding something in his hold cards that he's not thrilled about but isn't scared to come along either.  


I think that's the key. If he has a small pocket pair, he knows he isn't any farther behind than he was before the river. Essentially that the river didn't beat him. I think it makes his call with a small pocket pair (which beats us) easier on the river.

QUOTE
How much do we really beat here?  Our equity has dropped considerably (87% ish to 68%.  Against a LAG I may be coaxed into betting but how much?  $246 in the pot and my stack is at $431, the CO at $281.  I just can't see how we can bet (knowing the CO) and having him fold when he came this far.  To me, he has either two holdings - A jack or mid pocket pair.  So, either he's definitely not folding to any river bet holding a jack or he may be coerced into folding a mid pocket pair once that river jack hits.  A pot sized bet would commit a little over half your stack in a case where you're not sure you're ahead or not (and I don't thing you are).  


All we can really beat here is A high, and pocket 3s. That's it. Deuces are full, 4's are full, 5's beat us. Do you think a push could induce a hand like, 88 to fold? Or do you think we're too often called by Jx to make that worthwhile?

QUOTE
The CO hasn't shown any aggression, though, so perhaps a half-pot bet may induce a call or have him fold.  If it's reraised back I think it'll be for your whole stack and you may have to let it go..(ughhh...).  I think checking is just hand the hand to him, though, and what can you call with there?


Can we make a play on the river? Honestly, is there anything that tells you we can bet at this river(and win)?
DrawingDeadInDM
[quote=Chief]Your thoughts on the river play?
check/fold unless i dont put him on the jack in which case i bet half his remaining stack[/quote]

He's shown the apparent willingness to call down. We only beat a pair of threes and ace high, really. Is there really any value in this bet?

[quote]Do you bet more or less on any of the streets?
i bet out on the turn, if i dont get counterfeited on the river and a decent river falls i might check raise all in.[/quote]

I think betting out on the turn might get the villain to lay this down. He's just called the re-raise, so he may be doubting his hand. I think this is one part where I feel like it's really open for debate.

[quote]Do we slow down on the turn at all, expecting a call?
on that turn no[/quote]

I think this part is a bit awkward. If we believe the villain is calling us down regardless, I think we lower our bet, hoping to get raised, or to minimize any eventual loss on the river.

[quote]Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?
be selective. depends on the opponent.[/quote]

The Villain in this hand is where I think it gets a bit sticky. He's a straightforward TAG. But we're fairly certain we have him dominated on the turn. I don't know that we can really ask for more, but at the same time, we know for him to be in this pot, he has something.

[quote]Do you lead out the river if it gets checked behind on the turn?
yep.[/quote]

I disagree, on this river, we've made our own grave, really, if it gets checked behind us on the turn.

[quote]Do you lead out on the turn again? Or is the check/raise viable?[/quote]

the check raise is viable, but i still worry him hitting his 8 outer (pairing his kicker, the board pairing unfavorably either with his pair or another card), id bet as much as i can for value.[/quote]

I don't know that there is any value. Pocket fives have us thumped, and I think that that's about the only hand we can get to fold this river. Do you think we could move the villain off 88 or 77?
jneff24
I would lead out on the flop. If he raised me I would reraise. In other words I would try to get most of money in on the flop. Bottom two pair are strong on the flop but to many hands can beat you so I want to end the hand before the turn.
JSHamm
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM)
I don't think most TAGs raise with QJ here, KJ, maybe if they lean to the side of loose.

Do you think being the Villain in this hand, you'd call the flop with say, 88 or 77? If you did, what would your play be on the turn and river? When the jack comes do you bet when checked to? Do you check behind?

Acutally, I could see a TAG raising to protect his hand here. He really doesn't want you catching a higher card. The key is, though, he just called. I don't know why, but it screams mid pair to me.

QUOTE
I think that's the key. If he has a small pocket pair, he knows he isn't any farther behind than he was before the river. Essentially that the river didn't beat him. I think it makes his call with a small pocket pair (which beats us) easier on the river.


QUOTE
All we can really beat here is A high, and pocket 3s. That's it. Deuces are full, 4's are full, 5's beat us. Do you think a push could induce a hand like, 88 to fold? Or do you think we're too often called by Jx to make that worthwhile?


QUOTE
Can we make a play on the river? Honestly, is there anything that tells you we can bet at this river(and win)?


For the three above: Maybe he has the jack, but I really don't think so. I really put him on a mid pocket pair in the way he played it throughout. The second jack hits on the river which counterfeits our two pair if he does hold a mid pair; however, would a large enough bet on the river convince him we have the jack? I would have to know how he played post flop to the river more to make that kind of call. meh?
TJ_Eckleburg
If you're going to make a river play, the only way you can win is if you're not called.

I check/fold this river a lot, because I get really disgusted with bottom two pair for exactly this reason.

Bottom two pair sucks sooooo bad... and this is why.

I have a question for you though...

What if the turn is a Q and the river is a K? I think you no longer have the best hand against a lot of opponents.

The point of that question is, even if you DON'T get counterfeited, your hand will only rarely improve to a boat, and there aren't many combinations of decks that will come off on the turn and river to still give you a winner against a field.
petersun
QUOTE (TJ_Eckleburg)
What if the turn is a Q and the river is a K? I think you no longer have the best hand against a lot of opponents.

The point of that question is, even if you DON'T get counterfeited, your hand will only rarely improve to a boat, and there aren't many combinations of decks that will come off on the turn and river to still give you a winner against a field.


I don't even like the 9 on the turn since J9 is one of my fav to limp in late position in an unraised pot.

So how would you suggest he play it TJ?
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (TJ_Eckleburg)
I have a question for you though...

What if the turn is a Q and the river is a K? I think you no longer have the best hand against a lot of opponents.


This is where I dramatically slow my roll. We're beat by KQ, JK, QJ, K9, Q9, at least three of which are likely holdings for the villain. I check/call a smallish bet on the turn, check/call another smallish bet on the river.

It's very likely I check/call the turn and check/fold the river without boating up though.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (jneff24)
I would lead out on the flop. If he raised me I would reraise. In other words I would try to get most of money in on the flop. Bottom two pair are strong on the flop but to many hands can beat you so I want to end the hand before the turn.


How much would you raise to on the flop?
TJ_Eckleburg
QUOTE (petersun)
QUOTE (TJ_Eckleburg)
What if the turn is a Q and the river is a K? I think you no longer have the best hand against a lot of opponents.

The point of that question is, even if you DON'T get counterfeited, your hand will only rarely improve to a boat, and there aren't many combinations of decks that will come off on the turn and river to still give you a winner against a field.


I don't even like the 9 on the turn since J9 is one of my fav to limp in late position in an unraised pot.

So how would you suggest he play it TJ?


I like checkraising the flop better.

a) a free card DOES hurt our hand strength significantly, but the pot is smaller on the turn and easier to get away from.
b) We don't want to be multiway on the turn. Check/raising vs. betting can be the difference between heads up or multiway.
c) A check-raise plus a turn lead gets a lot of people off of top pair.
d) Everybody hates getting checkraised from the blinds with raggedy cards on the board, because it frequently means BS two pair.

I don't think we want to take this hand to showdown, and we don't want to be building a pot OOP with this hand.

If the flop checks around...

Bet the turn. Raises or callers should make you more likely to get away from the hand.

Basically, take a wa/wb line cautiously betting and trying to keep the pot small, and give yourself a chance to get away from the hand if you need to. You're always one card away from getting screwed.

If the check/raise works, and your turn lead is raised, then fold. If the turn lead is called, then check/value call the river (but check/fold this river obviously).
Chief
[quote=DrawingDeadInDM][quote=Chief]Your thoughts on the river play?
check/fold unless i dont put him on the jack in which case i bet half his remaining stack[/quote]

He's shown the apparent willingness to call down. We only beat a pair of threes and ace high, really. Is there really any value in this bet?

yeah...he will fold often enough if he is a reasonably tight player and he doesnt have the jack

[quote]Do you bet more or less on any of the streets?
i bet out on the turn, if i dont get counterfeited on the river and a decent river falls i might check raise all in.[/quote]

I think betting out on the turn might get the villain to lay this down. He's just called the re-raise, so he may be doubting his hand. I think this is one part where I feel like it's really open for debate.

i think if you suddenly check a safe turn card thats kinda suspicious, what do you want him to catch up?

[quote]Do we slow down on the turn at all, expecting a call?
on that turn no[/quote]

I think this part is a bit awkward. If we believe the villain is calling us down regardless, I think we lower our bet, hoping to get raised, or to minimize any eventual loss on the river.

ok if the villain is calling us down anyways then this part is fine. but by eventual loss you mean probable loss? because i was considering from this problem from the perspective that we dont know the river is going to be a Jack. of course keeping the pot smaller will minimize what we lose on the river if we decide to give up which is generally the best move

[quote]Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?
be selective. depends on the opponent.[/quote]

The Villain in this hand is where I think it gets a bit sticky. He's a straightforward TAG. But we're fairly certain we have him dominated on the turn. I don't know that we can really ask for more, but at the same time, we know for him to be in this pot, he has something.

i agree, if opponent was LAG you wouldnt be comfortable building as big a pot though? i feel almost as if we have a LAG crushed just as much but not more. i see what you are saying though, you feel like tag is representing some kind of top pairish hand, and we feel safer considering that possibility than a much wider hand range for a LAG who could be in there with garbage or big cards

[quote]Do you lead out the river if it gets checked behind on the turn?
yep.[/quote]

I disagree, on this river, we've made our own grave, really, if it gets checked behind us on the turn.

i meant general rivers. i forgot the Jack is going to be the guaranteed river. if not of course i give up, the pot is too small

[quote]Do you lead out on the turn again? Or is the check/raise viable?[/quote]

the check raise is viable, but i still worry him hitting his 8 outer (pairing his kicker, the board pairing unfavorably either with his pair or another card), id bet as much as i can for value.[/quote]

I don't know that there is any value. Pocket fives have us thumped, and I think that that's about the only hand we can get to fold this river. Do you think we could move the villain off 88 or 77?[/quote]

give up the RIVER but you asked if we lead the turn haha^^. i think one of the big questions you are driving at in this discussion is whether or not to bet the river after c/r-ing or leading the turn ... i think in general we dont, but there are certain circumstances in which i might move in on the river or bet strongly if i think the opponent is going to fold. most of the time i c/f the river, but if i am going to steal the pot, i am going to bet out. c/r the river is not an option IMO .. if the opponent leads into us after we showed much aggression on earlier streets we definitely need to fold to his bet after we check to him
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Chief)
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM)
QUOTE (Chief)
Your thoughts on the river play?
check/fold unless i dont put him on the jack in which case i bet half his remaining stack


He's shown the apparent willingness to call down. We only beat a pair of threes and ace high, really. Is there really any value in this bet?

yeah...he will fold often enough if he is a reasonably tight player and he doesnt have the jack

QUOTE
Do you bet more or less on any of the streets?
i bet out on the turn, if i dont get counterfeited on the river and a decent river falls i might check raise all in.


I think betting out on the turn might get the villain to lay this down. He's just called the re-raise, so he may be doubting his hand. I think this is one part where I feel like it's really open for debate.

i think if you suddenly check a safe turn card thats kinda suspicious, what do you want him to catch up?

QUOTE
Do we slow down on the turn at all, expecting a call?
on that turn no


I think this part is a bit awkward. If we believe the villain is calling us down regardless, I think we lower our bet, hoping to get raised, or to minimize any eventual loss on the river.

ok if the villain is calling us down anyways then this part is fine. but by eventual loss you mean probable loss? because i was considering from this problem from the perspective that we dont know the river is going to be a Jack. of course keeping the pot smaller will minimize what we lose on the river if we decide to give up which is generally the best move

QUOTE
Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?
be selective. depends on the opponent.


The Villain in this hand is where I think it gets a bit sticky. He's a straightforward TAG. But we're fairly certain we have him dominated on the turn. I don't know that we can really ask for more, but at the same time, we know for him to be in this pot, he has something.

i agree, if opponent was LAG you wouldnt be comfortable building as big a pot though? i feel almost as if we have a LAG crushed just as much but not more. i see what you are saying though, you feel like tag is representing some kind of top pairish hand, and we feel safer considering that possibility than a much wider hand range for a LAG who could be in there with garbage or big cards

QUOTE
Do you lead out the river if it gets checked behind on the turn?
yep.


I disagree, on this river, we've made our own grave, really, if it gets checked behind us on the turn.

i meant general rivers. i forgot the Jack is going to be the guaranteed river. if not of course i give up, the pot is too small

QUOTE
Do you lead out on the turn again? Or is the check/raise viable?


the check raise is viable, but i still worry him hitting his 8 outer (pairing his kicker, the board pairing unfavorably either with his pair or another card), id bet as much as i can for value.


I don't know that there is any value. Pocket fives have us thumped, and I think that that's about the only hand we can get to fold this river. Do you think we could move the villain off 88 or 77?


QUOTE
give up the RIVER but you asked if we lead the turn haha^^. i think one of the big questions you are driving at in this discussion is whether or not to bet the river after c/r-ing or leading the turn ... i think in general we dont, but there are certain circumstances in which i might move in on the river or bet strongly if i think the opponent is going to fold. most of the time i c/f the river, but if i am going to steal the pot, i am going to bet out. c/r the river is not an option IMO .. if the opponent leads into us after we showed much aggression on earlier streets we definitely need to fold to his bet after we check to him


You said you were concerned about his 8 outter, and then said you bet as much as possible for value. I took that to mean you were betting as much as possible on the river. My mistake.

I think you're correct, check/push is silly.

I think pushing the river might win it enough to be okay, but, I'm not sure.

Good posts, Chief.
Scott3705
Sorry to jump into this thread late.

I like your logic on the hand for the most part.

Your thoughts on the river play?

Check/fold. no real draws out there and the constant calling looks mostly like a j.

Do you bet more or less on any of the streets?

Given your lines the bets amounts are perfect.

Do we slow down on the turn at all, expecting a call?

The turn is the only place that I don't like as much as the rest of the hand. A weak jack is likely to take a free card a lot of the time. Checking after leading the flop is intended to fein weakness and hope he tries to take the pot. However, putting us in his shoes... How often are we going to raise this with a hand like qj? The BB can have any two cards and we can be walking str8 into a C/R. (I know this can be seen as hindsight, but I most times I go into "Get to showdown cheap mode" when the blinds bet and I don't have a strong enough hand to come at them. Therefore, I think you need to lead this pot again.

Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?

Yes, with some one calling with top pair, I like building a pot here because it's the only way you're getting paid off with this hand. It just kinda sucks when it gets counterfeited like this.

Is check raising the flop a more viable play, hoping to take it down there..?

It's defiantely a way to go here. This depends. Is your opponent a player who doesn't like to fold and doesn't like to feel like he's getting outplayed? If he is this type, then C/R gets more money in the pot on the flop and then we can try to bet big on the turn and take a nice size pot. If your opponent is the type to try to play small pots with marginal hands. I like leading the flop because it's going to slowly build the pot.

Do you lead out the river if it gets checked behind on the turn?
I check/fold the river.

Do you lead out on the turn again? Or is the check/raise viable?

Yes, I lead the turn. See above.


good post
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (TJ_Eckleburg)
I like checkraising the flop better.

a) a free card DOES hurt our hand strength significantly, but the pot is smaller on the turn and easier to get away from.


I think this is something I tend to ignore. That I build the pot too large with similar hands, making it much tougher to get away from when I believe I may be beat.

QUOTE
cool.gif We don't want to be multiway on the turn. Check/raising vs. betting can be the difference between heads up or multiway.


Do you think leading out the flop gets us heads up?

QUOTE
c) A check-raise plus a turn lead gets a lot of people off of top pair.


I agree, I think with this line we can get him to lay down top pair more often than not this way. What's our play on the river if he calls? Check/fold?

QUOTE
I don't think we want to take this hand to showdown, and we don't want to be building a pot OOP with this hand.


I tried to ignore position a bit, with this scenario, as I wanted it to be a situation where we would have a rag bottom pair, but..you know.

If we limp with say, 65s on the button, on a similar board and catch bottom two, I think this entire hand is much easier and is played very differently. Agreed?
TJ_Eckleburg
QUOTE
Quote:
b) We don't want to be multiway on the turn. Check/raising vs. betting can be the difference between heads up or multiway.


Do you think leading out the flop gets us heads up?


If you bet, UTG, CO, and/or SB could all call. Even worse would be if some called and one raised, whipsawing a lot of money in the pot.

If you check, UTG checks or bets, and CO checks or bets. If we can raise a bet here it'll make it much more likely we'll win the pot... or at least restrict the amount of people in the pot.

QUOTE
I agree, I think with this line we can get him to lay down top pair more often than not this way. What's our play on the river if he calls? Check/fold?


On this river, yes, check/fold.

On other "less bad" rivers, we can check/value-call. I don't advocate making a play here. Plays might succeed... but it's dumb, pointless, and dangerous to "outplay people" frequently in situations like these.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Scott3705)
The turn is the only place that I don't like as much as the rest of the hand. A weak jack is likely to take a free card a lot of the time. Checking after leading the flop is intended to fein weakness and hope he tries to take the pot.

However, putting us in his shoes... How often are we going to raise this with a hand like qj? The BB can have any two cards and we can be walking str8 into a C/R. (I know this can be seen as hindsight, but I most times I go into "Get to showdown cheap mode" when the blinds bet and I don't have a strong enough hand to come at them. Therefore, I think you need to lead this pot again.


Do you think we can take this down if he doesn't check behind? Is winning the pot by check/raising even a possibility in your mind?

QUOTE
Do you ever even consider building a pot this size with bottom two pair?

Yes, with some one calling with top pair, I like building a pot here because it's the only way you're getting paid off with this hand. It just kinda sucks when it gets counterfeited like this.


Does this hand change at all if limp on the button with these cards on the same board? Strictly from a positional stand point, that is.

Obviously position helps, but say, if it's checked to us on the river, in position, same cards, same board. Do we bet?
Scott3705
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM)
Do you think we can take this down if he doesn't check behind? Is winning the pot by check/raising even a possibility in your mind?

I'm assuming you mean on the river. No. my read for the most part here is that he has a weak jack. on the river, I don't know if I really like the idea of trying to represent a stronger jack or a set. Correct me if that's not what you meant.


Does this hand change at all if limp on the button with these cards on the same board? Strictly from a positional stand point, that is.

Obviously position helps, but say, if it's checked to us on the river, in position, same cards, same board. Do we bet?


Hard to say because hand would probably play out different. If villain does have a j, Flop probably goes bet and u raise. probably called. then your bet on the turn probably takes it down.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2010 Invision Power Services, Inc.