screech
Friday, November 25th, 2005, 8:31 PM
Party poker 5/10 full.
Tight UTG raises
I 3-bet AK OTB and get it HU
Flop(7.4SB): AQ4r
He bets, I raise, he calls
Turn(5.5BB): J completing the rainbow
He checks, I...
Steppin Razor
Friday, November 25th, 2005, 8:36 PM
What is r? ... and you bet.
KDawgCometh
Friday, November 25th, 2005, 9:36 PM
QUOTE (Steppin Razor)
What is r? ... and you bet.
r is rainbow
screech, I'm betting this all day long, things only get interesting if we get CRed(is this 6 max or full)
Anonymous
Friday, November 25th, 2005, 10:41 PM
Yes i'm betting here too. But what are you doing here if raised? I think you have to call...input anyone??
screech
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:25 AM
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
QUOTE (Steppin Razor)
What is r? ... and you bet.
r is rainbow
screech, I'm betting this all day long, things only get interesting if we get CRed(is this 6 max or full)
This is 5/10 full.
Does that change your play?
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:34 AM
Tight UTG Raised Pre-Flop right?
So our range for him? Given a TA-A Image... I'd say something like
AK-ATs - AJo, AA-88, KQs
What hands is he calling with here?
What hands is he check/raising?
What hands is he folding?
Good Check behind here screech?
p.s. No, I'm not back yet, I just stopped in quickly and saw this post. I miss this place
Peace.
screech
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:42 AM
That hand range looks about right. Once he bet/calls the flop, I think it can get narrowed down to:
AA-QQ, AK-AJ, ATs, and KQ.
QUOTE
Good Check behind here screech?
No.
But I wanted too really badly.
This hand really reminded me of "The Psychology of Poker", where the author talks about how the good TA players not only know their stuff, but are able to act confidently on their reads. I got one part right in this hand.
screech
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:43 AM
Turn(5.5BB): J completing the rainbow
He checks, I bet, villian raises, I...
play bad. What do I do now?
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:44 AM
QUOTE (screech)
That hand range looks about right. Once he bet/calls the flop, I think it can get narrowed down to:
AA-QQ, AK-AJ, ATs, and KQ.
QUOTE
Good Check behind here screech?
No.
But I wanted too really badly.
This hand really reminded me of "The Psychology of Poker", where the author talks about how the good TA players not only know their stuff, but are able to act confidently on their reads. I got one part right in this hand.
So you called his raise and then called the river bet?

Oh well, next time it won't happen like that.
Good Post by the way. Very good post.
KDawgCometh
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 10:03 AM
QUOTE (screech)
Turn(5.5BB): J completing the rainbow
He checks, I bet, villian raises, I...
play bad. What do I do now?
call and fold the river UI. and UI meaning that if a Q, K, or a 10 doesn't fall, fold. I'm just calling if a queen or King falls, and am raising is a 10 falls
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 10:36 AM
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
call and fold the river UI. and UI meaning that if a Q, K, or a 10 doesn't fall, fold. I'm just calling if a queen or King falls, and am raising is a 10 falls
Shouldn't we be more concerned with the turn? Do you really want to bet that turn in this spot? Run the range through, see what he does with each hand. I don't know, to me it seems like a very thin bet. One I would make against a Maniac in some spots, but even there I might proceed with caution. He seems like a relatively observant player, doesn't this seem like a perfect c/r with an AJ?
I like checking the turn, it's a very safe board to do this, and he might bet out on the river again... when he does I just call. I pray I don't make my 2 pair, an ace would be a nice card on the river.
KDawgCometh
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 10:41 AM
QUOTE (JaysonWeber)
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
call and fold the river UI. and UI meaning that if a Q, K, or a 10 doesn't fall, fold. I'm just calling if a queen or King falls, and am raising is a 10 falls
Shouldn't we be more concerned with the turn? Do you really want to bet that turn in this spot? Run the range through, see what he does with each hand. I don't know, to me it seems like a very thin bet. One I would make against a Maniac in some spots, but even there I might proceed with caution. He seems like a relatively observant player, doesn't this seem like a perfect c/r with an AJ?
I like checking the turn, it's a very safe board to do this, and he might bet out on the river again... when he does I just call. I pray I don't make my 2 pair, an ace would be a nice card on the river.
maybe, but I do think that us being ahead of KQ and A10 *might* be able to give us enough to bet the turn. Any other combo has two pair. Are we calling a UI river or folding that if we check this turn
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 11:30 AM
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
QUOTE (JaysonWeber)
QUOTE (KDawgCometh)
call and fold the river UI. and UI meaning that if a Q, K, or a 10 doesn't fall, fold. I'm just calling if a queen or King falls, and am raising is a 10 falls
Shouldn't we be more concerned with the turn? Do you really want to bet that turn in this spot? Run the range through, see what he does with each hand. I don't know, to me it seems like a very thin bet. One I would make against a Maniac in some spots, but even there I might proceed with caution. He seems like a relatively observant player, doesn't this seem like a perfect c/r with an AJ?
I like checking the turn, it's a very safe board to do this, and he might bet out on the river again... when he does I just call. I pray I don't make my 2 pair, an ace would be a nice card on the river.
maybe, but I do think that us being ahead of KQ and A10 *might* be able to give us enough to bet the turn. Any other combo has two pair. Are we calling a UI river or folding that if we check this turn
It doesn't. that's why we shoudln't be betting the turn in the first place. Our goal at this point in the hand should be "Get To Showdown" as cheap as possible.
If he fires on the river we have 6.5 bets in the pot, so we're getting 6.5-1 on a call, I think we have to call this, but we don't bet the turn.
6.5-1 is an easy call on the river if he misses his check/raise after we check behind on turn, we just saved 2 bets. If we win, we still played it right.
TJ_Eckleburg
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 12:07 PM
QUOTE
p.s. No, I'm not back yet, I just stopped in quickly and saw this post. I miss this place
Peace.
Good to have you almost back, J-dub... we've missed you too.
Smasharoo
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 12:21 PM
It doesn't. that's why we shoudln't be betting the turn in the first place. Our goal at this point in the hand should be "Get To Showdown" as cheap as possible.
If he fires on the river we have 6.5 bets in the pot, so we're getting 6.5-1 on a call, I think we have to call this, but we don't bet the turn.
6.5-1 is an easy call on the river if he misses his check/raise after we check behind on turn, we just saved 2 bets. If we win, we still played it right.
Man, when did you become so weak/tight?
Ahahaha.
Do you check behind if he checks again on the river?
good luck.
screech
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 12:42 PM
There are only a few hands I can see villian play this way when the turn card hits:
AA
KK
QQ
AK
AQ
AJ
ATs
KQ
I'm ahead of 14, behind to 16, and tied with 6 of his probable combos.
When I am behind, I am probably going to get check raised. Also, I have more outs on average when I'm behind then villian when he's behind.
Can those who want to bet this turn explain why it's better than a check?
Smasharoo
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 12:48 PM
Can those who want to bet this turn explain why it's better than a check?
Well, one, you left a lot of smaller pairs that will raise UTG out of your hand range, and two, you normally don't get to see villan's turn action before you bet or check.
Also, no preflop cap would narrow the hand range even more making TT a lot more likely than AA or KK from a metagame standpoint, not to mention that fact that you hold AK.
So it's actually pretty close.
good luck.
screech
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 1:12 PM
QUOTE
Well, one, you left a lot of smaller pairs that will raise UTG out of your hand range, and two, you normally don't get to see villan's turn action before you bet or check.
So if I include these hands like TT/99, I also have to include JJ. JJ will c/r the turn. TT/99 will probably fold if I bet, but might call a river bet if I show weakness on the turn. So if I think villian could peel bet/call this flop with a pp below queens, wouldn't checking the turn be even better?
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 5:19 PM
Well Smash, Glad to see you're still around... Always make someone provide a good lesson when you try to post.
Thanks for taking the time to explain that to him Screech. I don't think anyone who advocates betting this turn has any excuse except for the one Chris and I used to love... "ME TOP PAIR ME BET"
That's flawed thinking, You don't want to be betting this turn, It's just wrong.
.... do you see why? yet?
Smasharoo
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 5:44 PM
That's flawed thinking, You don't want to be betting this turn, It's just wrong.
.... do you see why? yet?
Hi.
I know it requires a certain small level of reading coprehention to understand the diffrence between explaining why someone might advocate for something and actually sugesting it. I realize actually reading the posts is pretty time consuming when you're not really intrested in what was posted but who posted it.
However.
I never suggested betting the turn.
Read it again and take another shot at it. Someday you'll be able to do this all on your own without me having to hand hold you through it.
good luck.
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 5:47 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
It doesn't. that's why we shoudln't be betting the turn in the first place. Our goal at this point in the hand should be "Get To Showdown" as cheap as possible.
If he fires on the river we have 6.5 bets in the pot, so we're getting 6.5-1 on a call, I think we have to call this, but we don't bet the turn.
6.5-1 is an easy call on the river if he misses his check/raise after we check behind on turn, we just saved 2 bets. If we win, we still played it right.
Man, when did you become so weak/tight?
Ahahaha.
Do you check behind if he checks again on the river?
good luck.
So you were referring to the river? Forgive me, You know I don't read posts.
Smasharoo
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 5:58 PM
So you were referring to the river? Forgive me, You know I don't read posts.
I was joking with you because you went through a period where you would have thought this was an easy turn three-bet and accused me of being weak tight constantly.
Then I asked if you'd check the river through too, because I was curious how you'd play it.
good luck.
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:07 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
So you were referring to the river? Forgive me, You know I don't read posts.
I was joking with you because you went through a period where you would have thought this was an easy turn three-bet and accused me of being weak tight constantly.
Then I asked if you'd check the river through too, because I was curious how you'd play it.
good luck.
lol yeah, that was my "ME TOP PAIR ME BET" period. It was funny getting out of it, but certainly the best thing to do.
I'm checking behind on the river too, Given nearly any river card. What's the point in betting it against this player? (I'm taking from the info given from Screech that this IS a good player) Betting this river is probably not profitable for us.
Say a 2 comes on the river. I think I still might check behind.. unless He is capable of calling with KQ? I don't think he has KQ. I think we're beat.
Are you asking both situations?
If he leads...
If he checks...
If he leads... I'll admit, I still suck at poker, I call.
If he checks... I probably check behind, I don't see any value in betting this.
If he leads I am pissed off.. But I have to call because we checked behind on the turn and that induces a lot of semi-bluffs. Sadly, the flop texture, and the way this hand was played... I don't think he's bluffing much.
Agreed? What's your take?
Smasharoo
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:14 PM
I think I probably bet/fold a fair amount of rivers here, actually.
Of course knowing he'd have C/Red this turn, I wouldn't in this hand....
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:21 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
I think I probably bet/fold a fair amount of rivers here, actually.
Of course knowing he'd have C/Red this turn, I wouldn't in this hand....

You're gonna bet/fold here... hmm... Interesting.
You think he's Just calling enough to make this worth it? I think we can assume that most of the hands he'll raise with here (if not, arguably all) after checking would have us beat.
But do we give him enough credit to check/raise this river after we checked behind on the turn? I really think he'd just lead out with whatever he has don't you?
It would take a really good player to set that line up, and try to make it profitable... I don't think it's a good line for HIM to take, therefore I don't think he'd take it. I think in his head, he'll try to get that last bet in on the river with his made hands and won't bother with a c/r in this spot. Especially with a blank coming (like the 2 I mentioned).
Does that change things? I'm to tired to think this out logically, gotta take this step by step right now
screech
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:40 PM
QUOTE
I was joking with you because you went through a period where you would have thought this was an easy turn three-bet and accused me of being weak tight constantly.
Haha,
I went through that stage too. It wasn't that long ago.
I think I should definetly bet that river (assuming a blank falls), if villian checks. Even most good players wouldn't check this river with a hand can't beat AK. That's one of the advantages of checking the turn. I may induce a bluff from hands that I beat, and I may get a hand that would have folded the turn to call the river.
JaysonWeber
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 6:56 PM
QUOTE (screech)
QUOTE
I was joking with you because you went through a period where you would have thought this was an easy turn three-bet and accused me of being weak tight constantly.
Haha,
I went through that stage too. It wasn't that long ago.
I think I should definetly bet that river (assuming a blank falls), if villian checks. Even most good players wouldn't check this river with a hand can't beat AK. That's one of the advantages of checking the turn.
I may induce a bluff from hands that I beat, and I may get a hand that would have folded the turn to call the river.
You saved the best sentence for your last!
Abbaddabba
Saturday, November 26th, 2005, 8:30 PM
I can understand why you'd want to check the turn.
I think that there's a problem with checking behind the turn and then bet/folding a blank river.
What hands attempt a checkraise here?
Checking behind on the turn tells him that you're weak enough that you fear a checkraise.
Betting the river tells him that you're strong enough that you want to get value.
If he has a hand that doesnt beat a legitimate value bet, he could put two and two together and make a move there with something that he knows you have beat, if he believes that there's a good chance that you'll fold it.
It doesnt seem likely. But then, there are no cards that he could hold that would make sense to attempt a checkraise at a blank river after you check behind on the turn.
Actuary
Monday, November 28th, 2005, 8:13 PM
before reading replies.
gosh, does 5/10 get that tricky that this is not an obvious:
Bet !?
Bet/Call turn.
**now I read replies**
oohhh.
well, I got a ways to go.
That good of a read on this guy?
Almost makes me wonder why you called/raised preflop.
Were you hoping to flop TJQr ?
I got lots to learn.
may I post here?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.