Phillip_339
Wednesday, November 23rd, 2005, 12:40 AM
QUOTE (Suited_Up)
QUOTE (Phillip_339)
QUOTE (Suited_Up)
Full Tilt.
Best site hands down.
I would agree with this if it wasnt for the numbers. I feel that Full Tilt doesnt have enough people on the site, which makes Pokerstars stand out more. Full Tilt has it all, except for the sheer numbers. I like playing on pokerstars, playing in a tournmant against 1000 others, but i dont think you see that on Full Tilt. Full Tilt is a great site, but i personally think it lacks numbers to make it the best.
Going up a lot lately... all the guaranteed tourneys are getting higher too cause the numbers are increasing.
Very true. I havent been back to Full Tilt in a while, but i think i will soon. Not long from now, Full Tilt will be the best site around, and even now with its numbers, its still right up there as the best, so i think in the next week, i will definently deposit into there and see how i go. The reason i talk about the numbers, is because im almost purely a tourney based player, and i think at the moment, ub and stars are the places to be for tourneys, but soon it will be ft.
I'm liking this discussion, because there is no idiot talk about how rigged one site is compared to the other, because in my opinion, that is not a valid argument. I have seen just as bad beats dished out on my time at ft and ub, as there are on stars.