Zach6668
Monday, November 21st, 2005, 11:33 AM
QUOTE (dms26)
QUOTE (Briguy)
Am I missing something here?
Check/call, check/call, check/fold.
If you are running a bluff because the table is passive (presumably you have villian on Ax, KK-99 after he slowed down on the flop), then you have to take another shot on the river. You are not going to win with T-high if villian checks behind. I think it's a spew, but the turn bet was a spew, anyway.
he picks up 3 more outs on the turn and took the lead on the flop, I don't think the turn bet is a spew. He could get someone to fold a hand like 77-JJ and maybe even QQ or KK.
I don't like the check raise on the flop because all you have is the flush draw, I can see a check raise if you had overcards and a flush draw.
My thinking on the c/r preflop was that there was already 11.5 SB's in the pot, so I have a pretty big equity edge here, and the PF raiser was directly to my left. I didn't really think about the players who folded to the single bet, if more of them would have stayed around, it would have been more profitable, I think. So, after seeing replies, it seems like a marginal play that could have gone either way. I really didn't expect the one caller to fold for the extra bet.
Now that it's down to heads up, I figured I had some fold equity, along with my 9 flush outs, and 3 straight outs, so I bet out, thinking he could think I had the ace, and would possibly fold smaller pairs.
That was my thinking anyways, thanks for the feedback everyone!
:-)