WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:41 PM
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
FREDDIE MERCURY
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:43 PM
That means my home game is rigged!!!!!! I didn't even know it..
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:43 PM
QUOTE (FREDDIE MERCURY)
That means my home game is rigged!!!!!! I didn't even know it..
Why does this happen in your home game all the time?
FREDDIE MERCURY
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:46 PM
Everytime i am about to win, my son ask do i have any 7's and wins Go Fish.
Petoria
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:47 PM
Shatner, just die. We dont want to hear another damn album where you pseudo-rap.
No they dont have a limit on how many sng's can be running at one time.
fjandans
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:49 PM
i do not think this is logical, captain.
scottyno
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:49 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
You're right, I've NEVER EVER EVER seen top 2 vs top set before in a sit n go, it MUST be rigged
And one time I had kings, and he had aces, it must be rigged right?
:wall: :wall: :wall:
beans-n-icewater
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:50 PM
You're absolutely right!!! I'll bet it cost a fortune for them to build so many tables to play on... they HAVE to get the players off of a table for others to sit down....
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:50 PM
QUOTE (Petoria)
No they dont have a limit on how many sng's can be running at one time.
What fantasy world do you live in? Are you suggesting that there is no limit to the number of games they can run? Please explain the need for a waiting list then.......donkey!
Rebecca
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:51 PM
I must be missing something. If you were on the button, why you were betting first?
Anyway, I've seen this in home games and online.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:51 PM
QUOTE (fjandans)
i do not think this is logical, captain.
Our first Star Trek reference ladies and gentleman. Give the dildo his award for least creative flamer.
jack24bauer24
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:51 PM
The OP of this thread has boldly gone where not too many morons have gone.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:52 PM
QUOTE (Rebecca)
I must be missing something. If you were on the button, why you were betting first?
Anyway, I've seen this in home games and online.
He checked.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:53 PM
QUOTE (scottyno)
You're right, I've NEVER EVER EVER seen top 2 vs top set before in a sit n go, it MUST be rigged
And one time I had kings, and he had aces, it must be rigged right?
:wall: :wall: :wall:
What a good defense. It happened once to you so it is reasonable to expect it to happen so many times online. Go back to NWP dandruff licker.
looshle
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:54 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (Petoria)
No they dont have a limit on how many sng's can be running at one time.
What fantasy world do you live in? Are you suggesting that there is no limit to the number of games they can run? Please explain the need for a waiting list then.......donkey!
The waiting list is waiting on people to play, not for tables to open. My god people.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:55 PM
QUOTE (beans-n-icewater)
You're absolutely right!!! I'll bet it cost a fortune for them to build so many tables to play on... they HAVE to get the players off of a table for others to sit down....
You don't think it cost money to add more tables?
fjandans
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:55 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (fjandans)
i do not think this is logical, captain.
Our first Star Trek reference ladies and gentleman. Give the dildo his award for least creative flamer.
did you just call me a dildo?
you keep this up, you're going to put me on tilt
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:55 PM
QUOTE (jack24bauer24)
The OP of this thread has boldly gone where not too many morons have gone.
Dildo #2.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:57 PM
QUOTE (looshle)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (Petoria)
No they dont have a limit on how many sng's can be running at one time.
What fantasy world do you live in? Are you suggesting that there is no limit to the number of games they can run? Please explain the need for a waiting list then.......donkey!
The waiting list is waiting on people to play, not for tables to open. My god people.
Do you not play on Ultimate Bet? They sometimes have a waiting list of 30+ people. Of course there is a limit to the number of tables they can run at one time.
ralphw
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:57 PM
i was dealt J6 on the big blind. 9 left in a tourney. two callers. flop comes J66. someone bets, i just call. 9 comes on the turn. guy goes all in, i call.
guy shows two nines and i am out. I missed an all expenses trip and tourney buyin into WPT event by three places.
ONLINE POKER IS NOT RIGGED.
YOU ARE A MORON.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:58 PM
QUOTE (fjandans)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (fjandans)
i do not think this is logical, captain.
Our first Star Trek reference ladies and gentleman. Give the dildo his award for least creative flamer.
did you just call me a dildo?
you keep this up, you're going to put me on tilt
Yes I did! But take solace in the fact that at least you serve a purpose.
kers2
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:59 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (jack24bauer24)
The OP of this thread has boldly gone where not too many morons have gone.
Dildo #2.
I hate you for saying Ub is rigged then giving this shi
tty example, but I love you for using my favorite word of all time, Dildo.
beans-n-icewater
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:59 PM
wow...I was just trying to imagine where they keep all of the tables. It's gotta be a BIG building!
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 7:59 PM
QUOTE (ralphw)
i was dealt J6 on the big blind. 9 left in a tourney. two callers. flop comes J66. someone bets, i just call. 9 comes on the turn. guy goes all in, i call.
guy shows two nines and i am out. I missed an all expenses trip and tourney buyin into WPT event by three places.
ONLINE POKER IS NOT RIGGED.
YOU ARE A MORON.
You just called and you call me a moron! LOL
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:01 PM
QUOTE (beans-n-icewater)
wow...I was just trying to imagine where they keep all of the tables. It's gotta be a BIG building!
You are obviously confused regarding live games vs. online games. Go back to your legend of zelda.
SapphireTiger
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:01 PM
Yo moron, guess what. You're not allowed to flame anyone flaming you on this thread because you have to be mentally retarded for to believe this is true.
good post.[/b]
SapphireTiger
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:02 PM
Yo moron, guess what. You're not allowed to flame anyone flaming you on this thread because you have to be mentally retarded for to believe this is true.
good post.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:03 PM
QUOTE (SapphireTiger)
Yo moron, guess what. You're not allowed to flame anyone flaming you on this thread because you have to be mentally retarded for to believe this is true.
good post.[/b]
What does that say about the flamers that I, a supposed mentally retarded moron, am able to flame them back?
Loismustdie
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:04 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
Would you be as pissed if he had trip jacks? Or A-J? That happens all the time.
On the other hand, I have not played on UB for weeks- I decided that if I wanted to beat my head against the wall than I would just do that, and skip the losing money part.
beans-n-icewater
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:05 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (beans-n-icewater)
You're absolutely right!!! I'll bet it cost a fortune for them to build so many tables to play on... they HAVE to get the players off of a table for others to sit down....
You don't think it cost money to add more tables?
of course... the number of hurricanes this year has increased the cost of plywood,screws, glue, and other materials used to build the tables you play at online...
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:06 PM
QUOTE (Loismustdie)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
Would you be as censored if he had trip jacks? Or A-J? That happens all the time.
On the other hand, I have not played on UB for weeks- I decided that if I wanted to beat my head against the wall than I would just do that, and skip the losing money part.
If he had had trip jacks then he would have just been another donkey that likes to chase. The cards came out like they did to generate action between the two big stacks.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:07 PM
QUOTE (beans-n-icewater)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (beans-n-icewater)
You're absolutely right!!! I'll bet it cost a fortune for them to build so many tables to play on... they HAVE to get the players off of a table for others to sit down....
You don't think it cost money to add more tables?
of course... the number of hurricanes this year has increased the cost of plywood,screws, glue, and other materials used to build the tables you play at online...
We don't want to hear about your job at Home Depot here.
LuckyMcCatcher
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:07 PM
Waiting list for S&Gs? 1 fills up another starts that simple.
Loismustdie
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:08 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (Loismustdie)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
Would you be as censored if he had trip jacks? Or A-J? That happens all the time.
On the other hand, I have not played on UB for weeks- I decided that if I wanted to beat my head against the wall than I would just do that, and skip the losing money part.
If he had had trip jacks then he would have just been another donkey that likes to chase. The cards came out like they did to generate action between the two big stacks.
You neglected the possibility of A-J. Seriously, this happens all the time.
Here is some advice- stop letting your account get down to 5 bucks.
Jeepster80125
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:08 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
The flop is decided by a random number generator (RNG), not a type of program that no one knows or no one can access. The RNG is what you are saying is rigged.
I think you should talk to Tritz. Do you think a company that big could cover up a programming "rigging" that "creates action" between "the two biggest stacks" and have not a single person go public with that knowledge? Get off tilt, and think seriously. Think about the amount of work it would be to pull something off. All the way from the programming team up through the execs. There is no way an employee knew that fact and didn't try to cash in, be it from blackmailing the company to going public. And, there is no way only one or two people knew. The people who would profit and the people required to actually carry out what you are suggesting are in two totally different worlds. Do you think they all sign a "secret contract" that promises never to tell? Get real.
I can't believe I spent more than a minute replying. Oh well. When you learn to read, go here, and then come back with an argument better than top set versus top two between big stacks.
http://www.billrini.com/index.php/2005/09/...-is-not-rigged/
Finally, if you can read "good 'nuff"...
http://www.pokerstars.com/rng_audit.html
Tritz might argue this, but you are flat out wrong. Sorry. The sample size of hands you played is one. The sample size that normal, educated people consider before they make such an accusation is much more immense. Play twenty thousand hands and then check your results. I would bet that you win with top set vs someone else with top two pair while big stacked. Does this make sense Forrest?
J in Colo.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:08 PM
QUOTE (LuckyMcCatcher)
Waiting list for S&Gs? 1 fills up another starts that simple.
No it doesn't. I have been on a waiting list on UB for over an hour.
SapphireTiger
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:08 PM
listen up. i hate the tone of your posts. you're arrogant and condescending and a know-it-all.
do you have poker tracker? How big is your database? show me a screenshot of your hands and tell me that there's some abnormal fluctuation in how the hands are distributing. you have no credibility.
and your flames suck.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:09 PM
QUOTE (Loismustdie)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (Loismustdie)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
Would you be as censored if he had trip jacks? Or A-J? That happens all the time.
On the other hand, I have not played on UB for weeks- I decided that if I wanted to beat my head against the wall than I would just do that, and skip the losing money part.
If he had had trip jacks then he would have just been another donkey that likes to chase. The cards came out like they did to generate action between the two big stacks.
You neglected the possibility of A-J. Seriously, this happens all the time.
Here is some advice- stop letting your account get down to 5 bucks.
Who said my account was down to $5? That's incredibly presumptuous of you. Are you a Christian by chance?
Rebecca
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:09 PM
You have to expect many flames when you proclaim a site is "definately rigged." And then post one hand to prove it.
I get frustrated at some of the crazy hands I see online. We all do. But instead of blaming the site... I take a look at the hand, and see if there was anything I should have done differently. Maybe that's what you could do here.
A home game hand that was memorable:
We were playing tourney style....three people left.
the board has 4 hearts.
One player had the K high flush
I had A

Q
Third player had 10

9

and ended up with a straight flush.
Crazy, but certainly not rigged.
Player one was a relative....he ended up folding on the river. Third player was my Dad...who check raised me...lol.
We were playing at a family reunion.
God, I love the family I was born into.
kers2
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:12 PM
QUOTE (Rebecca)
You have to expect many flames when you proclaim a site is "definately rigged." And then post one hand to prove it.
I get frustrated at some of the crazy hands I see online. We all do. But instead of blaming the site... I take a look at the hand, and see if there was anything I should have done differently. Maybe that's what you could do here.
A home game hand that was memorable:
We were playing tourney style....three people left.
the board has 4 hearts.
One player had the K high flush
I had A

Q
Third player had 10

9

and ended up with a straight flush.
Crazy, but certainly not rigged.
Player one was a relative....he ended up folding on the river. Third player was my Dad...who check raised me...lol.
We were playing at a family reunion.
God, I love the family I was born into.
Your home game was ultimate rigged
brian67
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:12 PM
OP doesn't seem to play much poker, and at least go as far as the other "this site is rigged" guys and mention more than one hand as an example.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:13 PM
QUOTE (Jeepster80125)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
The flop is decided by a random number generator (RNG), not a type of program that no one knows or no one can access. The RNG is what you are saying is rigged.
I think you should talk to Tritz. Do you think a company that big could cover up a programming "rigging" that "creates action" between "the two biggest stacks" and have not a single person go public with that knowledge? Get off tilt, and think seriously. Think about the amount of work it would be to pull something off. All the way from the programming team up through the execs. There is no way an employee knew that fact and didn't try to cash in, be it from blackmailing the company to going public. And, there is no way only one or two people knew. The people who would profit and the people required to actually carry out what you are suggesting are in two totally different worlds. Do you think they all sign a "secret contract" that promises never to tell? Get real.
I can't believe I spent more than a minute replying. Oh well. When you learn to read, go here, and then come back with an argument better than top set versus top two between big stacks.
http://www.billrini.com/index.php/2005/09/...-is-not-rigged/
Finally, if you can read "good 'nuff"...
http://www.pokerstars.com/rng_audit.html
Tritz might argue this, but you are flat out wrong. Sorry. The sample size of hands you played is one. The sample size that normal, educated people consider before they make such an accusation is much more immense. Play twenty thousand hands and then check your results. I would bet that you win with top set vs someone else with top two pair while big stacked. Does this make sense Forrest?
J in Colo.
Yes, you have convinced me. There is no criminal activity taking place within the walls of big business in North America. Every criminal activity has been exposed. And all that work. Who goes through so much work to make billions?
Do you keep a copy of the Warren report under your pillow?
jaaaaakke
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:13 PM
yeah im sure ultimate bet would totally discredit their site for some 5$ sng.........
beans-n-icewater
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:13 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (beans-n-icewater)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (beans-n-icewater)
You're absolutely right!!! I'll bet it cost a fortune for them to build so many tables to play on... they HAVE to get the players off of a table for others to sit down....
You don't think it cost money to add more tables?
of course... the number of hurricanes this year has increased the cost of plywood,screws, glue, and other materials used to build the tables you play at online...
We don't want to hear about your job at Home Depot here.
hey... I'm the only one around here that's agreeing with you. Now, If you'll excuse me, I have to go smear some more feces on this padded wall...
Jeepster80125
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:13 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (SapphireTiger)
Yo moron, guess what. You're not allowed to flame anyone flaming you on this thread because you have to be mentally retarded for to believe this is true.
good post.[/b]
What does that say about the flamers that I, a supposed mentally retarded moron, am able to flame them back?
You are flaming a veteran of this forum as a fan of Star Trek. How much weight do you think your flames are worth? It's sad, actually. But keep up the good work.
Loismustdie
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:14 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (Loismustdie)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
QUOTE (Loismustdie)
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
I know I'll get a bunch of people disagreeing with me but Ultimate Bet is definitely rigged. The cards are coordinated to create action and end sit n go's quicker so another one can start.
I was in a $5 S&G and it was down to 5 players with the blinds at 50/100. I had the 2nd biggest stack and was dealt A:spade: 8:spade: on the button. It was folded to me and I raised 300. The SB who had the biggest stack called and the BB folded. The flop came A:heart: 8:diamond: 6:club:. I bet 500 and the SB called. The turn was J:diamond:. I bet 700 and the SB called. The river was 5:club: and I pushed all in. The SB called and turned over A:diamond: A:club:. That is so totally rigged for action it's ridiculous. All four aces out at such an opportune time when the two biggest stacks are going at it. I know a lot of you guys don't want to admit it, but the poker sites have a motive for rigging it like that. The game will end quicker and other games can start. And don't give me that crap about it not being worth the risk because there is no risk. They'll never get caught because they have so many convinced that it wouldn't be worth the risk.
So let's here the flaming and all the Star Trek jokes.
Would you be as censored if he had trip jacks? Or A-J? That happens all the time.
On the other hand, I have not played on UB for weeks- I decided that if I wanted to beat my head against the wall than I would just do that, and skip the losing money part.
If he had had trip jacks then he would have just been another donkey that likes to chase. The cards came out like they did to generate action between the two big stacks.
You neglected the possibility of A-J. Seriously, this happens all the time.
Here is some advice- stop letting your account get down to 5 bucks.
Who said my account was down to $5? That's incredibly presumptuous of you. Are you a Christian by chance?
Yes, and psychic to boot. I could have told you to fold. Possible hands that beat you: Set of aces, set of 8's, set of 6's, set of jacks, A-J, set of 5's- your A-8 is not that strong buddy I eat A-8 for breakfast.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:15 PM
QUOTE (SapphireTiger)
listen up. i hate the tone of your posts. you're arrogant and condescending and a know-it-all.
do you have poker tracker? How big is your database? show me a screenshot of your hands and tell me that there's some abnormal fluctuation in how the hands are distributing. you have no credibility.
and your flames suck.
Would you like a photocopy of my drivers license too? I know my flames suck. Unlike you, that is not why I come here. I'll try to improve. I'll use the word suck more.
Jeepster80125
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:16 PM
QUOTE (WilliamShatner)
Yes, you have convinced me. There is no criminal activity taking place within the walls of big business in North America. Every criminal activity has been exposed. And all that work. Who goes through so much work to make billions?
Do you keep a copy of the Warren report under your pillow?
I forget. Which online poker companies are located in North America, or even in the USA? Like I said, get off tilt, spend fifteen minutes doing some research, and then reply like someone with an IQ higher than the speed limit.
Thanks.
WilliamShatner
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:17 PM
QUOTE (Rebecca)
You have to expect many flames when you proclaim a site is "definately rigged." And then post one hand to prove it.
I get frustrated at some of the crazy hands I see online. We all do. But instead of blaming the site... I take a look at the hand, and see if there was anything I should have done differently. Maybe that's what you could do here.
A home game hand that was memorable:
We were playing tourney style....three people left.
the board has 4 hearts.
One player had the K high flush
I had A

Q
Third player had 10

9

and ended up with a straight flush.
Crazy, but certainly not rigged.
Player one was a relative....he ended up folding on the river. Third player was my Dad...who check raised me...lol.
We were playing at a family reunion.
God, I love the family I was born into.
You are an asset to this community. And I sincerely mean that!
kers2
Wednesday, October 26th, 2005, 8:17 PM
I eat pieces of shit like WilliamShatner for breakfast
You eat pieces of shit for breakfast?
Only WilliamShatner
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.