KowboyKoop
Thursday, October 13th, 2005, 10:53 PM
QUOTE (bleacherbum3)
I initially agreed with the protest idea. The Brett game was not replayed, but it was continued from that point.
I did hear today that the blown call wasn't even protestable because it was considered a judgement call, not a rule. I don't really agree with that, but that's what I saw today. I guess it's kinda like an unreviewable call in football.
The game was replayed from Brett's home run onward. That is what I meant, whatever.
Also, it is a rule that you can't call a batter out in that exact situation and then rule that he is not out. But the umps have twisted it around to cover their a
ss. For example, they showed an example from the same game, in the 6th inning, where an Angels player swings at strike three in the dirt. Once he swings and misses, he makes the "waving" motion that he made in the ninth inning to signal a "swing and miss" BUT NOT AN OUT. He makes the OUT call ONLY after the catcher tags the batter with the ball, which is the correct way to do it.
The mistake the umpire made was he made the "swing and miss" signal when A.J. swung and missed, and then he made the OUT call before he knew for sure whether the ball had been caught. He should have just not made the call and acted like the ball hit the dirt, that way, if the batter was tagged or thrown out, then it wouldn't be a problem, but if A.J. did make it to first, then the home plate ump. could have huddled with the other umpires to see whether the ball had been caught or not, and if they decided that the ball had been caught, they could call A.J. out. However, b/c he called A.J. out too soon, and then allowed him to run to first, he backed himself into a corner that there was no way out of, without admitting that he broke the rule, which there is no way the umpires will ever do. and now everyone is trying to cover it up in the media (ESPN). Whatever though.