akishore
Wednesday, September 21st, 2005, 2:01 PM
QUOTE (Egarim)
A very good argument can be made for folding that turn. It's not an incredibly incorrect play to call or fold on the turn. But assuming u call on the turn there's no reason to call on the river after u had 2 overcalls on the turn. Someone has a pair... meaning ur flush is sh1t.
this logic usually isn't sound.
plenty of low limit, much less *micro*, players will call to showdown ace-high, king-high, and sometimes queen-high or jack-high.
QUOTE (Egarim)
Also, aseem, ur idea of getting overcalls on the river for more value is absolutely absurd. First, ur hoping the bettor just has ak. So u can beat him. Next, anyone that overcalls has u beat. So, ur actually hoping they all fold their pair behind u. That was definitely one of the worst comments I've read from a supposedly "good" strat poster on this forums. Atleast u have some good posts other times... maybe that offsets the bad.
i disagree.
conversely, for a raise to be correct, you'd have to assume that:
a) the bettor *still* has AK

the people behind you have pairs
c) the people behind you are tight and will *fold* those pairs to two cold
going for an overcall requires:
a) the bettor *might* have AK but he *might* have a boat... you are unsure

the people behind you might (usually will in micro* call with worse hands than flushes, but fold those same hands to two cold
i don't see how you can argue this.
going for overcalls is a thing you do when you are unsure whether you beat the bettor or not and when you can get worse hands to call one whereas they would probably fold to two.
aseem