Ok I can't figure out how to put this in words and I'm not sure that it makes all that much mathematical since but here goes...
*Similar* to sthief's(sp? 2+2) bankroll theory.
I 3 table all of the time so this works for me. I've been playing 1 table at my bankroll, 1 table 1 limit lower than my bankroll, and 1 table 1 limit higher than my bankroll.
What's this accomplishing?
It's helping me stay "looser" for lack of a better term at the highest limit, while helping me not "nutbar" at the lowest limit. My downswings aren't as bad b/c as we all know if we tilt and are 4 tabling it affects us on all the tables. Well if I lose a big pot/bad beat at the lower limit It doesn't affect me as much (probably b/c less money lost). So I feel as if I've cut my tilting by 1/3. Does this make sense?
I don't know...it just helps me play better. There may even be a better mathematical way to figure out the bankroll for this, other than 300BB for current level = 1 limit up and 1 limit down.
If this doesn't make sense I'm sorry, if anyone feels like this has any merit than maybe you can comment and finish my thoughts.