Okay, I'm an idiot, I know...

http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconver...hhconverter.cgi

Bet-The-Pot format

Also slowing down with kings here would be ridiculous.

I would also cap 6's in this spot, no reason to slow down when you have the overfull. Too many other fullhouses you are ahead of, and also ahead of trips.

Fold the river. It's never right to show down the NUT FULL HOUSE if the board has a straight flush possiblity.

You must show your opponent your cards after you fold. Then, when he tries to bluff you later, you can call down and scoop a small pot.

Okay, I was pretty sure about the KK, but was really wondering about 66. Does anyone slow down with 66?

no

Grrr, now I really messed it up with that converter...this is why I stay out of Strategy...

Okay, got it now...

The guy had 66, so I won the pot, but I was thinking if I had 66, I wouldn't have capped the river.

Okay, I was pretty sure about the KK, but was really wondering about 66. Does anyone slow down with 66?


No, look.

Part of poker is that you're going to pay off straight flushes and quads. you'll also get paid off.

This'll happen once every 100k hands or so either way.


It's meaningless long term. Missing value against A5 or 56 here is much bigger error than paying off quads or whatever.

There's no question here. This is just a silly thread. Both of you are right. Part of limit holdem is paying off better hands sometimes. That's poker.

Plus, you're playing 3 handed. No way should either of you slow down at any point.