AceyDeucy
Thursday, August 11th, 2005, 11:44 AM
QUOTE (JacKingOff_suit)
QUOTE (AceyDeucy)
QUOTE (JacKingOff_suit)
What I was trying to say is, on the turn I would either just check (if the next two players are good players so I was OOP), or if I decided to make a play, I would only to pot it, not a cent less.
Right, which I guess points back to my original question:
What does potting accomplish that a lesser bet does not?
It's because no one has shown strength on the flop, if the flop didn't help them, how could a K on the turn help much (don't forget that you are also holding the K!)? If you pot the turn, you are more than 50% likely to take the pot there. If you got called, you could assume your opponent was on some draws (against good players, the big bets happen here for this type of board,
visit this link for great discussions, , especially the
reply from gergery. It's not the same situation, but somehow similar, and you can learn something from the thread). If you got potted back, you can safetly toss it. But it's a +EV move to take the pot right there.
But if you bet less than the pot here, you are running the rish getting play back.
You run that risk either way. I doubt that half-pot bet would induce significantly more bluffs than a pot-sized bet. And you shouldn't plan your strategy around "what if he bluffs here?" If he makes a ballsy bluff, pat him on the head and save that move for when you have the nuts.
And really, that situation was NOT that similar. This where Paul Phillips makes a really snarky remark about wildly different the situation really is.
Granted, I don't really view bluffing as a major part of my game in Omaha, except for the odd naked-ace bluff here and there. In fact, I would generally prefer to play more of a sophisticated Post Oak bluff in Omaha, if I were going to do that. Your argument that a K is unlikely to help also figures into the thoughts of the other players.
Truthfully, I think we will have to "agree to disagree" here. I don't think attacking with a pot-sized bet has significantly more value than a much smaller bet, but I do think it makes your play more expensive. I grant that you are a more aggressive PLO8 player than I am, but it is an expensive mistake to assume everyone plays like you. I don't think a lot of players would re-pot it there on a steal attempting to represent the same slow-played straight that you are representing with this bet.