pre-flop: akishore is EP with Q
akishore limps, MP (poster) raises.
flop: Q
SB checks, akishore bets.
turn: 5
SB checks, akishore checks, MP bets, MP calls, SB calls.
river: Q
SB bets, MP folds.
(ignore the pre-flop limp. it was a misclick.)
i'm thinking a better line would be to check-call the flop and lead the turn after SB checks, in hopes that MP raises. this way the SB has to call two cold on the expensive street rather than on the cheap one. it protects my hand more and if i can make him fold a better hand, that would be amazing.
i feel that i'm calling a flop raise and checkraising the turn against a pre-flop raiser with JUST top pair too much. i think i should be saving this line for stronger hands like two pair and better. should i be three-betting more with top pair? i get the same information, and it's cheaper. i also have more fold equity by leading the turn than i do by check-raising the flop, i think.
i've noticed that most people tend to not fold on the same street that they bet... if they bet the turn and get check/raised, they will usually still call to save face, even with ace-high, and check/fold the river.
by three-betting the flop, they will still call that last bet, but i have much more equity when i bet the turn. alternately, i could check-raise the flop and lead the turn.
so, which of these lines is best:
1. bet/call the flop and check/raise the turn, like i did.
2. bet/three-bet the flop and lead the turn if he doesn't cap.
3. checkraise the flop and lead the turn if he doesn't three-bet.
4. check/call the flop and lead the turn in hopes that he raises.
i'm out of position. i feel like this should be standard, but that it's a leak in my game.
how does the play change if the raiser is on my right rather than my left (while still being in position)?
aseem