econ_tim
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:17 PM
Ultimate Bet 1/2 Hold'em (8 handed)
converter
Preflop: econ_tim is UTG+1 with [Kc], [Qh]. MP2 posts a blind of $1.
UTG calls,
econ_tim raises, UTG calls.
Flop: (9.50 SB) [Td], [Js], [Ac]
(4 players)
UTG checks,
econ_tim bets, UTG calls, econ_tim calls.
Turn: (7.75 BB) [8s]
(3 players)
UTG checks, econ_tim checks,
CO bets, CO calls, UTG calls.
River: (13.75 BB) [8d]
(3 players)
UTG checks,
econ_tim bets, CO calls, UTG calls.
Final Pot: 16.75 BB
Right to trap UTG here?
Don't worry Custom, Empire is next.
custom36
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:20 PM
Anyway, this hand looks fine.
Dirtydutch
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:21 PM
Perfect.
Dirtydutch
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:31 PM
My avitar back up?
custom36
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:31 PM
QUOTE (Dirtydutch)
My avitar back up?
Yup.
Dirtydutch
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:33 PM
I tryed to get jessica alba on there, but it didn't work.
Smasharoo
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:54 PM
Hi, this isn't "trapping"
It's a stop and go.
econ_tim
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:56 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
Hi, this isn't "trapping"
It's a stop and go.
OK. I'm just trying to get the hapless UTG to call as many bets as possible. Maybe I need to work on my poker jargon. Can't I trap him with my stop and go? :-)
Dirtydutch
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:56 PM
Hi, this isn't "trapping"
It's a stop and go.
You, and your fancy names! you may think you know everything, but you don't know how to not hurt someones feelings! :cry: :cry:
econ_tim
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:58 PM
BTW, of the three poker terms in the subject (flop, trap, and broadway), I used at least two of them correctly, so I don't feel that bad.
Smasharoo
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 8:59 PM
It's just a semantic thing. If you check/called the flop and then raised the turn...that'd be "trapping".
This is, of course, the much better line (yours).
akishore
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:00 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
Hi, this isn't "trapping"
It's a stop and go.
no it's not.
a stop and go would mean OP led the turn.
he didn't.
aseem
akishore
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:01 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
It's just a semantic thing. If you check/called the flop and then raised the turn...that'd be "trapping".
This is, of course, the much better line (yours).
he was OOP. he bet/called the turn and check/raised the turn.
almost identical line to calling the flop and raising the turn if he was in position.
they're both trapping, no?
aseem
Smasharoo
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:15 PM
they're both trapping, no?
No.
Trapping, you show weakness with stregnth, then raise. Stop and go, you show stregnth, flat call a raise indicating some weakness inducing a bet on a bigger street which you raise.
akishore
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:17 PM
hmm. i was under the impression that a stop and go was:
i'm SB with K-K. flop comes K-7-2. i bet, button raises, i call. turn comes 4, i bet.
(i stopped on the raise and "go"-ed on the turn by leading out.)
if a stop and go is also flat-calling a raise and check-raising the turn (rather than leading the turn), okay.
aseem
Smasharoo
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:18 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
It's just a semantic thing.
Actuary
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:19 PM
thanks
econ_tim
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:19 PM
Maybe this is the thread to revive the "implied odds" vs. "inferred odds" controversy.
akishore
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:21 PM
QUOTE (econ_tim)
Maybe this is the thread to revive the "implied odds" vs. "inferred odds" controversy.
lmao.
aseem
akishore
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 9:22 PM
QUOTE (akishore)
It's just a semantic thing.
aseem
Vade
Tuesday, June 28th, 2005, 10:58 PM
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
QUOTE (Smasharoo)
It's just a semantic thing.
L0l @ quoting yourself.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.