Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Oesd+overpair Facing Turn Push
FCP Poker Forum > Poker Strategy Forum > No Limit Texas Hold'em Cash Games
jmbreslin
10NL Rush.

Full Tilt No-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (9 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

MP1 ($24.61)
MP2 ($9.85)
MP3 ($4.35)
CO ($15.13)
Hero (Button) ($10)
SB ($16.90)
BB ($5.21)
UTG ($12.94)
UTG+1 ($10.44)

Preflop: Hero is Button with J, J
2 folds, MP1 calls $0.10, 3 folds, Hero bets $0.40, SB calls $0.35, 1 fold, MP1 calls $0.30

Flop: ($1.30) 10, 8, 5 (3 players)
SB bets $0.60, MP1 calls $0.60, Hero raises to $2.20, 1 fold, MP1 calls $1.60

Turn: ($6.30) 9 (2 players)
MP1 bets $22.01 (All-In), Hero ???
trystero
snapple

Ninja Ace
Snap and expect to be way ahead a huge amount of the time
trystero
per request

jmbreslin
What do you put him on?
trystero
put myself on raspberry peach

put him on the occasional straight, comboish hands like JT, 87, 97, turned flush draws, some naked like AsJs, some combos like KsTs. Doesn't matter much since the pot's too big to fold, and the only draws which got there are 67/qj and we're blocking qj. And it's 10nl.
KingJames
QUOTE (trystero @ Thursday, March 11th, 2010, 8:58 PM) *
per request




Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
jmbreslin
Funny, so far the consensus of the replies on 2+2 are along the lines of "easy fold."
Ninja Ace
QUOTE (jmbreslin @ Thursday, March 11th, 2010, 9:04 PM) *
Funny, so far the consensus of the replies on 2+2 are along the lines of "easy fold."


BC 4 is filled with a bunch of nits
SwolyswoND
And you wonder why we talk down about 2+2.

This is a fairly easy call. It's pair + turned FD a TON here.
jmbreslin
QUOTE (SwolyswoND @ Friday, March 12th, 2010, 12:37 AM) *
And you wonder why we talk down about 2+2.

This is a fairly easy call. It's pair + turned FD a TON here.


T7ss to be precise.

My first thought was concern about a straight, but discounted it for a few reasons:
1) I have 2 blockers for any straight involving a J
2) QJ would have meant he called the initial donk from SB and then my raise with a gutter+overs (possible, but not highly probable)
3) He would have had to open-limp 76 (again possible, but not highly probable)
4) If he did turn the straight, why shove the turn instead of making a smaller bet or check-raising?

The good news is I am getting more comfortable making these kinds of calls. In my super-nit days I'd fold a large percentage of these.
rrumsey
i fold, kinda looks like a donk spazzing with a st8 worried about a flush completing on the river. this is by now means imo an easy call. if you think his timing was condusive with a bluff then we can maybe call, kinda thin imo we are praying to be bluff catching a lot. I mean if we call we can't be mad when we stare down drawing to a chop
donk4life
QUOTE (rrumsey @ Friday, March 12th, 2010, 11:15 AM) *
i fold, kinda looks like a donk spazzing with a st8 worried about a flush completing on the river. this is by now means imo an easy call. if you think his timing was condusive with a bluff then we can maybe call, kinda thin imo we are praying to be bluff catching a lot. I mean if we call we can't be mad when we stare down drawing to a chop


Did you pass 3rd grade English?
trystero
QUOTE (jmbreslin @ Friday, March 12th, 2010, 11:42 AM) *
T7ss to be precise.

My first thought was concern about a straight, but discounted it for a few reasons:
1) I have 2 blockers for any straight involving a J
2) QJ would have meant he called the initial donk from SB and then my raise with a gutter+overs (possible, but not highly probable)
3) He would have had to open-limp 76 (again possible, but not highly probable)
4) If he did turn the straight, why shove the turn instead of making a smaller bet or check-raising?

The good news is I am getting more comfortable making these kinds of calls. In my super-nit days I'd fold a large percentage of these.


Most of this reasoning is fine but #3 doesn't really work, because although it's unlikely that someone will open-limp 67, it's also unlikely that he'll open-limp a lot of the hands we had put him on like 97 and the hand he actually had, T7.

My reasoning is, "This is 10nl, villain is PROBABLY bad (limp/call pf and then he didn't raise this board, like he could limp/call pf w/a pocket pair but when he hits his set then he has to raise), the pot is large, and the board is extremely draw-heavy, making it likely that he can be pushing combo hands."
rrumsey
QUOTE (donk4life @ Friday, March 12th, 2010, 10:21 AM) *
Did you pass 3rd grade English?

it is spring break for me and i have been drinking LOL! smile.gif
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.