mtdesmoines
Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 3:05 PM
QUOTE (shynepo3 @ Wednesday, March 10th, 2010, 3:54 PM)

I'll just get right into it... the fact that 1 limper chooses to call my $20 raise, and the other goes all in for $40 after my raise...the all-in shorty has a wiiiiide range....and the small chance he has me dominated...anyways, this is the hand:
UTG - calls $5
UTG + 1 calls $5
fold
fold
fold
Cutoff/hero raises to $20 ($340) - K

7
Button folds
SB calls $20 ($300ish)
BB calls $20 ($500ish)
UTG calls $15 ($600ish)
UTG + 1 goes all in for $40 total
Hero decides to raise all in $340
I figure, $80 in dead money (which is my $20 + the other 3 callers) + $40 (the shorty stack). That's $120 to my $340 raise...whatever the odds are. Assuming they will all fold, which they will probably over 90% of the time, even if they put me on steal. I go heads up against the shorty, whom I assign a wide range to. So I look at it $20 to win $120.
What do you think?
I've done this before but there has to be pretty specific circumstances, as in all the callers are "floppers" who have uncallable hands.
Also, whenever I do this, it immediately causes a huge debate on the table. Theoretically, I don't have to be ahead of EVERYONE'S range, I just have to be competitive with the all-in's range because no one else is going to call.