Bo Snerdley telling it like it is

Followed by one of the best examples of why rush is so much fun to watch/listen too:

Tears in two steps

go to the Rush Limbaugh Home page and see his interview on William Shatner's Raw Nerve

This is awesome... tough to harp when a black dude is the one doing it

Rush rushed to hospital in Hawaii and is apparently in serious condition as per TMZ

Good luck Rush, fight hard

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_limbaugh_hospital

.

fwiw, tiger was also initially reported to be in serious condition.

I wonder if his rapid weight loss will be blamed for his health problem, he lost like 80 pounds in less than 6 months.

The guy is gonna lose half and most of his sponsors I cant think of a more serious condition.

If he was going to cheat on his wife, the very least he should have done is cheat with someone who has just as much to lose as him, not some attention whore PR chick from vegas.

What a dumbass.

Try arranging to have 7-10 hot women who have reputations to lose on your yacht.


Not so easy. Not so fun either.

Especially when the yacht needs to get it's Coast Guard inspection bi-annuals...you know how troublesome that can be. I just started leasing and turning them in, saved on so much hassles.

Speaking of that, did you see the JFK picture released by the source of All True Gossip, TMZ?

It suppposedly shows JFK on a yacht with 4 naked women romping and playing around him, taken when Jackie was pregnant with a baby that miscarried while he was off philandering. Not that it's a surprise that he cheated on her, but if the picture had been released at the time, his Camelot image might have been severely damaged.

I think that picture was bogus.

.

Wait, TMZ is now retroactively stalking, gossiping, and spreading rumors about people from the past?

Are we finally going to learn what really ended Antony and Cleopatra's relationship?

Don't be an asp

Meh. I'm not thrilled about the joke, but I like the idea.

Is was either that or a Bangles reference and you seem a tad young.

Wondering whats with Stan Kroenke deciding to exercise his option to match any offer to buy the St. Louis Rams. This puts him at odds with the cross ownership rules the NFL has in place. Also wondering if there is a quid pro quo with Commissioner Goodell to lift the cross ownership rules if Kroenke agrees to move the team to LA when they finish their new stadium.

http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/sports/st...CC?OpenDocument

Hmmm

“The ocean will take care of this on its own if it was left alone and left out there. It’s natural. It’s as natural as the ocean water is.”

---Rush Limbaugh talking about the oil spill in the Gulf

Are you saying that oil isn't natural? Because oil is formed from plankton and it's always leaking into the oceans from rifts and earthquakes. Usually the earthquakes don't know the very best spot to split open, like BP does, but it's still absolutely natural and has happened for millions of years*.







* if you believe in the hypothesis of evolution.

Obviously the oil is natural.

Drilling down into sub-oceanic oil fields is a human activity.



P.S. you dont even need to believe in evolution to know the proper age of the earth.

So this oil is different?

How so?

Well, I think the main difference is the fact that, you know, there's a lot of it in a concentrated area.

Or is the argument that anything which is natural cannot possibly be bad or something that we try to prevent?

Define a lot ( while talking about a mass of water the size of the gulf)

I'd say this is a lot:

http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2010/05/0...larger-florida/

Is it really that expensive to drill a new well? This is going to be ridiculously costly for BP, both in PR and actual clean-up.

Once they get this thing under control, the oil will help pay for the cost nicely.

3.5 million gallons are still 3.5 million gallons, no matter how thinly spread out it is.

So Rush got married over the weekend.

She's hot




She's 33, he's 59.

I'm sure she loves him for his mind.

What is this, wife number 5?

Maybe he should hope for a little less change.

clear violation of the x/2+7 rule

Well, his whole family is made up of lawyers and judges, so he probably has the most air tight prenup you can get. I never heard about his other wives getting away with a lot. I am sure they did alright, but nothing Paul McCartnyesqque

If we don't have a spokesman with a flaw on our side, how else can you guys negate everything he says by pretending that we claim to be the party of family values and this means anyone who is ever divorced is a hypocrite therefore what he has to say about fiscal issues is moot?

Rush is doing this for you!


And because she's 33 and hot

Wives are like underwear; you need to change them every 7-10 years or things get nasty.

Looks like Rush will be the next project on the Haney Project on the Golf Channel.

I am looking forward to it.

Odds that Daniel won't be golfing with Rush ?

Elton John liked Rush and invited him and his new wife to dinner whenever they are in London....


I would put Elton at 99% more liberal than Daniel, and 87% more gay!


I cannot imagine that the online poker world could find a better person in the world to get involved on our side for the legalization of online poker than Rush

YEAH BG BUT THEN WE HAVE TO LEGALIZE HEROIN NEXT! THINK OF THE CHILDREN!

Jokes need some remote connection to reality in order to be funny.

The heroin connection to the drug issue was actually brought up by the pro-legalization side, not the anti-'turn our country into a shooting gallery' side.

Therefore your connection you tried to make falls flat.

Work more on following the conversation before you interject your 'jokes' K?





Thanks,

The entire board

Okay BG. Anyone who regularly reads your 'discussions' on your views regarding points like gay marriage, drug legalization, left/right biases, racism, religion etc. can see your hilarious use of willful ignorance and totally biased worldview. It's okay because you have put in your time, you're old school, and you're an elder.

Let me be clear: I am not criticizing you at all. I think you are a great person, father etc. But your obvious biases are just pretty funny. I'm just giving you crap for that.

Would you like to get into the point that you are addressing? You are against legalization of marijuana for medical purposes, and one of your pieces of 'evidence' is the argument that if you make all drugs legal then we're fucked because then the kids will be shooting heroin instead of trying to buy smokes. You never actually take this point, you just spew it as a talking point. You have specifically stated that you are anti-medical pot because once we legalize that than we'll legalize everything else, right? You won't ever agree to medical marijuana on the basis that legalizing that opens too many doors to legalizing harder drugs right? Can we talk about you and your opinion and not everyone else? It's confusing when you use talking points. I am absolutely fascinated by your worldview, but I understand you being hesitant to open up like that.

Do you actually want to talk about it, or keep trading light-hearted jabs at each other? I'm fine with either.

Dude, I like mixing it up with you. Just to be clear. I just like giving it back the way I get it. But I'm cool with you.



No, actually it was Henry who introduced the entire argument that the 'insane war on drugs' should include all drugs, not me.
I use the gateway argument as a joke mostly. I don't think everyone who smokes pot will shoot heroin, but I would say that people who never smoke pot are much more likely to never do harder illegal drugs. So the argument of the slippery slope is not without any basis, just not one clear cut enough to justify not legalizing pot.

I spent 16 months in a rehab, know lots of reformed drug addicts, so I admit that my worldview is greatly slanted because of this. I don't think that drugs are a positive on society at all, and their illegality is the best choice even though it's not a good choice.

So any arguments in here about legalizing all drugs were in reference to someone arguing to legalize all drugs.

As far as pot, if it gets legalized, I won't move because the USA will end. But let's not pretend that the medicinal maryjuanda people really give a crap about the medicinal side of pot, they just want to smoke pot. That's why anyone with $200 can get a prescription, and then self-prescribe any amount they want to for any ailment they can name including being nervous, or having a headache. The very few people who can be helped by smoking pot can find other forms of help, even if they cost more. It's not a 'only solution' to their problem, just a cheaper one that humorously also includes you lighting a weed and ingesting it, something that we as a society have completely demonized when the weed is tobacco and cigars. So maybe I'm just jealous because I have to pay $10 a stick for a good cigar while you pot heads are still smoking $2 joints!




Can't we do both, or is that too much thinking for you?

I am glad that you replied, and I hope I get more time by the end of the day for a proper reply.

I just wish that we'd see more actualBG than friendlytrollguyBG, it's much too difficult to get you to make posts like this that actually have you taking a position and defending it. Much respect.

Legalizing pot issue isn't one I care much about, so it's hard to want to get into it.

Like I said, I'm kind of meh about the whole issue.

I just like engaging Henry because he's smarter than me on most things.

And I am trying to boast my stock in pharmaceuticals by making his blood pressure rise when I can.

awesome.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/...azry4V#comments


Sarah Palin went on tv today to blast Rahm Emanuel for alleging that most GOPers secretly agree with Joe Barton. Guess she and Rush should have a huddle and talk this one over and get their stories straight. Nice of the Republicans to help Obama out of this pickle.

You've got it all backwards; my blood pressure goes up when I don't have anyone to explain the world to. Leading people from the darkness lowers my blood pressure(*).






(*) Most of the time.