Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Rush Limbaugh Bid To Buy St. Louis Rams
FCP Poker Forum > Daniel's Forums > Daniel's Poker Blog
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
CaneBrain
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4556315

The first NFL owner comes out and says he will vote against Limbaugh.

You need 24 of 32 owners to say yes. (I assume the guy selling to you votes yes.)
Balloon guy
QUOTE (vbnautilus @ Tuesday, October 13th, 2009, 1:52 PM) *
Yes. Neither of them should be convicted of a crime.


Even I know that the courts, the police and the jails don't decide whether or not something should be illegal, only if they are illegal.
Someone taking a perscribed drug and becoming addicted never breaks any laws.
Someone using an illegal narcotic is breaking the law.

When the laws change, then you can accuse Rush of being a hypocrite, but until then..you guys are wronger than two left shoes.

QUOTE
OH YEAH? You checked them all? Even the little tiny ones in his inner ear??


Well those are the ones that broke on him, so maybe they are racist...
Balloon guy
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Tuesday, October 13th, 2009, 1:53 PM) *
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=4556315

The first NFL owner comes out and says he will vote against Limbaugh.

You need 24 of 32 owners to say yes. (I assume the guy selling to you votes yes.)


This the same guy that refused to allow the convicted dog fighter to be allowed to play in the league?

Oh, that's right, they all allowed Vick to return, but they really put the screws to him, he had to sit out for 3 whole games.

antistuff
QUOTE (Jeepster80125 @ Tuesday, October 13th, 2009, 12:19 PM) *
You don't sound like you have any knowledge or personal experience with any sort of addiction.


ive had severe problems with heroin and cocaine. to say that i'm entirely past them at this point in my life would probably be a lie.

i do also think that no matter how much you may think you know about addiction like maybe somebody very close to you had problems or something until you've been there sick and vomiting and shivering there is just something about it thats not possible for somebody who hasn't went through it themselves to really understand. your comment kind of offended me at first but then i realized its just you being you and thinking you know everything so its pretty benign and no harm done.

theres too much else to go back and respond to it all and i really don't feel like it. i like the idea of rush owning a football team and didn't mean to derail things so much.

i guess a lot of my point was that being an addict is being an addict. its not an illegal/legal thing. and its not a whats socially acceptable and whats not thing. its just the same boring drug thing going on and on and never changing like it just does. the differences between sticking a needle in your arm and getting pills from a doctor are superficial.

the rest of my point was that the old junky fairy tail about having some sort of injury befall you and poor you gets hooked after that is exactly that, a fairy tail. its just an excuse, and a pretty lame one at that. go to an NA meeting. almost every single person there has the same story. the reality of it is that if you get hooked on pain meds maybe you found out about them because you got hurt, but once you are abusing them you are doing it for the same reason that the homeless junky on the street is - because you can't cope with life and drugs are actually a very very good quick temporary fix for that problem.

i don't care about any of the hypocrisy stuff and find it funny that anybody would. his job is an entertainer. its like a rock star or rapper who goes on and on about drugs and they themselves are clean. nobody cares as long as the music is good.


BigDMcGee
QUOTE (Jeepster80125 @ Tuesday, October 13th, 2009, 11:19 AM) *
You don't sound like you have any knowledge or personal experience with any sort of addiction.



QUOTE (antistuff @ Tuesday, October 13th, 2009, 11:25 PM) *
ive had severe problems with heroin and cocaine. to say that i'm entirely past them at this point in my life would probably be a lie.



vbnautilus
QUOTE (Jeepster80125 @ Tuesday, October 13th, 2009, 9:19 AM) *
You don't sound like you have any knowledge or personal experience with any sort of addiction.


When I read this line I really could not decide if you were serious or if you knew anti and were being sarcastic.
brvheart
Cane... you know that Rush's #1 man, engineer and call screener, is a black dude named James Golden, right?
strategy
.
strategy
.
antistuff
QUOTE (strategy @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 9:01 AM) *
now, before the lynch mob gets fired up... you can't judge my previous post based solely on what I said. there's a subtle point in it, but you wouldn't know that because you haven't read all 11,750 of my posts. you're pigeonholing me and you really shouldn't do that until you've read everything I've written on FCP.


does it come in paperback?
SlapStick
QUOTE (Balloon guy @ Tuesday, October 13th, 2009, 7:15 PM) *
BTW, I heard on Rush's show that there will soon be a lot fo retractions in major media stories because of the false reporting about Rush's comments on race etc.


That only works because you don't listen to any other media.
Balloon guy
QUOTE (SlapStick @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 6:11 AM) *
That only works because you don't listen to any other media.


no, it just makes it easier...
CaneBrain
QUOTE (brvheart @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 3:58 AM) *
Cane... you know that Rush's #1 man, engineer and call screener, is a black dude named James Golden, right?



Sure. Don't worry I think Rush is a jerk not a racist. But you cant say the things he has said over the years and not expect some blowback. Comes with the territory.

Again, I think Rush should get to be a minority owner if he wants. However, at this rate, I dont think he will get approved if he tries.

Also, I am not sure that Rush having a black friend means anything....

"rush, you're a racist!"
"nuh uh, I have a black friend!"
"who works for you and does your chores"
"......"
Mercury69
How about Jim Balsillie? Wouldn't it be awesome to have an NFL franchise in Canada?
Balloon guy
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 8:57 AM) *
Sure. Don't worry I think Rush is a jerk not a racist. But you cant say the things he has said over the years and not expect some blowback. Comes with the territory.

Again, I think Rush should get to be a minority owner if he wants. However, at this rate, I dont think he will get approved if he tries.

Also, I am not sure that Rush having a black friend means anything....

"rush, you're a racist!"
"nuh uh, I have a black friend!"
"who works for you and does your chores"
"......"



You should be listening to Rush today.

He is executing a scorched earth attack on all the 'journalist' who have been reporting the false statements attributed to him. One guy had a DUI hit and run manslaughter past, and Rush ripped him apart, no he is pointing out the Reverand Jackson's checkered past, including the King assasination when Jackson rubbed some of the blood from King's bods onto his shirt to get more air time.

It is really fun.
JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 8:57 AM) *
Again, I think Rush should get to be a minority owner if he wants.

I think we should all get to own minorities.

Sorry Sal, I know it's bad, but I couldn't resist any longer.
Balloon guy
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 8:57 AM) *
Sure. Don't worry I think Rush is a jerk not a racist. But you cant say the things he has said over the years and not expect some blowback. Comes with the territory.

Again, I think Rush should get to be a minority owner if he wants. However, at this rate, I dont think he will get approved if he tries.

Also, I am not sure that Rush having a black friend means anything....

"rush, you're a racist!"
"nuh uh, I have a black friend!"
"who works for you and does your chores"
"......"


Actually Snerdley ( his name on the show ) is probably a lot like Tigar's caddy Stevie..a multi millionair now while doing his best to stay in the background.

Although he does have a role on the show as shown by the folllowing exchange:

QUOTE
RUSH: Let's bring in our Official Obama Criticizer, Mr. Bo Snerdley. Let me know when the electronics and the technology are ready, because I think... Does the Obama criticizer have something to say about this? Would you like to weigh in?

SNERDLEY: Thank you very much, Rush. Official Obama Criticizer Bo Snerdley here. I have a question.

RUSH: Wait, wait. You are "officially black enough to criticize," right?

SNERDLEY: "Officially black enough to criticize," right on, brother!

RUSH: Okay, good.


So not only is Bo Snerdley a part of the show, he is officially black enough to critize Obama and have it not be racist.
Sal Paradise
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 11:57 AM) *
Again, I think Rush should get to be a minority owner if he wants.

totally agree. wanna come with me to the next meeting?




QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 2:05 PM) *
Sorry Sal, I know it's bad, but I couldn't resist any longer.

glad you opened the door.
Balloon guy
wow I didn't realize that these things were said before the campaign:

QUOTE
"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man


QUOTE
"You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.... I'm not joking."


QUOTE
"The point I was making was not that Grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn't. But she is a typical white person, who, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know, you know, there's a reaction that's been bred in our experiences that don't go away and that sometimes come out in the wrong way, and that's just the nature of race in our society."





This makes me want to rethink the level of racism.
Zealous Donkey
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?i...e=ESPNHeadlines

Didn't even make it a week. Score a win for the race traders.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (Zealous Donkey @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 8:38 PM) *
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?i...e=ESPNHeadlines

Didn't even make it a week. Score a win for the race traders.



ok, even I think this is a raw deal for Rush......but I love the ego on the fat-ass to compare his failed bid to be a....limited owner of the Rams to the "future of America".
brvheart
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 9:08 PM) *
ok, even I think this is a raw deal for Rush......but I love the ego on the fat-ass to compare his failed bid to be a....limited owner of the Rams to the "future of America".


It's shocking that you actually think that it's 'ego' and not 'business genius', for him to act mistreated. His ratings are at an all-time high right now.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (brvheart @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 9:20 PM) *
It's shocking that you actually think that it's 'ego' and not 'business genius', for him to act mistreated. His ratings are at an all-time high right now.



I think both those things usually cross-over a lot. Plus, this is not about him being mistreated (frankly, he is being a little mistreated) but the fact that he can keep a straight face comparing it to the future of America. Most tycoons have egos and Rush is certainly a conservative media tycoon.

BigDMcGee
QUOTE (brvheart @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 9:20 PM) *
It's shocking that you actually think that it's 'ego' and not 'business genius', for him to act mistreated. His ratings are at an all-time high right now.



Yeah, it's highly likely he never thought he would become an owner at all, and just did this for the massive publicity it would generate. Which if so, is genius. The man knows how to capitalize on white male insecurity alright.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 10:57 PM) *
Yeah, it's highly likely he never thought he would become an owner at all, and just did this for the massive publicity it would generate. Which if so, is genius. The man knows how to capitalize on white male insecurity alright.



that would be pretty brilliant. and very plausible. and there is no downside....if he actually gets to be an owner thats good too.

damn.
Zealous Donkey
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, October 14th, 2009, 9:59 PM) *
that would be pretty brilliant. and very plausible. and there is no downside....if he actually gets to be an owner thats good too.

damn.


He is going to get a ton of mileage out of this. I agree with what you said earlier about having to pay a price for being so outspoken and controversial, but this is the flip side, when something like this happens he will gain alot of momentum and he will surely capitalize. Actually that makes much more sense. Rush is a smart man and had to know he wasn't going to be allowed to own an NFL team.

This gained alot of publicity, for Rush and Checketts, and Checketts will get favorable media coverage for dumping Rush. And Rush can get 6 months worth of shows out of this on liberal hypocracy alone. It was a win win for Rush and Checketts. (And who is to say Rush doesn't end up owning part of the team anyway as a secret silent partner).

Balloon guy

I think you guys are wrong about how Rush is dealing with this.

From the years I've listened to him and especially after he went to recovery and talked about his experience, I am of the opinion that this result hurts Rush.

He really is a guy who was a nobody and felt like it who became successfull, but even with all his success he is still at heart a man who feels rejection harder than most.

I'm sure he will talk about the deal being busted etc, and will put on a good front, but deep down I believe he is hurt by this and hurt by the people who would believe that he is a racist, which he knows he is not.

He doesn't have a drive to be anything other than what he is today, mainly because he is so successful that there isn't much more room, but also he is doing what he loves, and because he was the first, he is making Oprah like money doing it.

But he was hurt by this. And embarrassed that this whole thing might have brought down his friend's chances and that's why he backed out of the deal.


He's just a man, not Machiavelli
brvheart
QUOTE (Balloon guy @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 10:28 AM) *
I think you guys are wrong about how Rush is dealing with this.

From the years I've listened to him and especially after he went to recovery and talked about his experience, I am of the opinion that this result hurts Rush.

He really is a guy who was a nobody and felt like it who became successfull, but even with all his success he is still at heart a man who feels rejection harder than most.

I'm sure he will talk about the deal being busted etc, and will put on a good front, but deep down I believe he is hurt by this and hurt by the people who would believe that he is a racist, which he knows he is not.

He doesn't have a drive to be anything other than what he is today, mainly because he is so successful that there isn't much more room, but also he is doing what he loves, and because he was the first, he is making Oprah like money doing it.

But he was hurt by this. And embarrassed that this whole thing might have brought down his friend's chances and that's why he backed out of the deal.


He's just a man, not Machiavelli


All this is compatible with my comment. I agree with what you've said here, but I definitely think that Rush is smart enough to make this situation work for him and it's not his 'ego' that is driving the train.
Zealous Donkey
QUOTE (Balloon guy @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 10:28 AM) *
I think you guys are wrong about how Rush is dealing with this.

From the years I've listened to him and especially after he went to recovery and talked about his experience, I am of the opinion that this result hurts Rush.

He really is a guy who was a nobody and felt like it who became successfull, but even with all his success he is still at heart a man who feels rejection harder than most.

I'm sure he will talk about the deal being busted etc, and will put on a good front, but deep down I believe he is hurt by this and hurt by the people who would believe that he is a racist, which he knows he is not.

He doesn't have a drive to be anything other than what he is today, mainly because he is so successful that there isn't much more room, but also he is doing what he loves, and because he was the first, he is making Oprah like money doing it.

But he was hurt by this. And embarrassed that this whole thing might have brought down his friend's chances and that's why he backed out of the deal.


He's just a man, not Machiavelli


I dont' really disagree with anything you have said here. But Rush knows the media better than anyone in the country, so he had to know that there was at least a moderate possiblility for it to play out this way. I do think he was sincere when he says he loves the NFL and it has been a dream of his to own a team.

The NFL is really painting themselves in a corner. I hope they know who all the minority owners are of every team. There is going to be a lot of scrutiny put on some of those owners.
strategy
.
JoeyJoJo
I was just thinking Florida could use another hockey team.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 12:23 PM) *
I was just thinking Florida could use another hockey team.


If the Panthers folded tomorrow, seven people would be CRUSHED.
antistuff
i find peoples intolerance of other peoples (real or imaginary) racism ironic. the sad kind of ironic though not the funny one.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (antistuff @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 2:12 PM) *
i find peoples intolerance of other peoples (real or imaginary) racism ironic. the sad kind of ironic though not the funny one.



I find your intolerance of other people's intolerance to be happily racist.
antistuff
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Thursday, October 15th, 2009, 3:22 PM) *
I find your intolerance of other people's intolerance to be happily racist.


hmm....that hadn't occurred to me....
Balloon guy
Rush opens up about what happened with the whole deal
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (Balloon guy @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 4:21 PM) *



yeah, you have to be a member to read that, so pass.
Balloon guy
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 2:28 PM) *
yeah, you have to be a member to read that, so pass.



Here's his number two guys response then:


QUOTE
RUSH: Now, ladies and gentlemen, the Official Obama Criticizer, Bo Snerdley, asked me yesterday if he could enter this fray. His theory is that he is Certified Black Enough to legitimately and without criticism criticize Obama. And he would like to say some words about this NFL episode. So without any further delay, here is Mr. Bo Snerdley, the Official Obama Criticizer here on the EIB Network.

SNERDLEY: This is Bo Snerdley, Official Obama Criticizer for the EIB Network. Certified Black Enough to criticize with 100% organic slave blood. Today, Obama isn't the issue. This is the special sports edition. And I have a statement: "My fellow Americans, this week, a racial spectacle has been played out which is nothing less than disgraceful." You know what? Screw this! We're going to the translation right now, only this time it's not a translation for the EIB brothers and sisters in the 'hood, it's a translation to the 'hood. Yo, my fellow homeys, especially those of you who play in the NFL: Every single one of you who shouted out against Rush, check yourself, dog. You got played, okay? Rush ain't your problem, yo. He never was your problem. He never will be your problem. Twenty years, man! For 20 years Rush has been telling everybody: You brothers in the NFL deserve to get paid.

The NFL and every other sports league there is got a break it off to you because you the best, right? The owners they got to break it off to you, give up your props, give you your props. Any of you fools know that, yo? No. Instead you get all puffed up behind some Obama flackie, jump on TV, start mouthing off about "Rush said this! Rush said that! Slavery this, slavery that," whatever, whatever. It was all made up, yo! Some of these clown reporters on TV who fed all the stuff to you, yo, you know what they doing now? They are out here trying to apologize quietly so they don't get their asses sued, yo! Check that out. Y'all got played. So here's your question for you brothers, especially some of y'all in the NFL. Y'all going to man up? Y'all going to man and up say, "Hey, we got played man. We kinda sorry. Oops, we didn't know."

Okay, now, let me -- while I'm -- yo, let me get this off, okay? McNabb. Can we just do this one more time? Square up. Even if Rush said what y'all thought he said, which he didn't say, what's the biggie? Y'all thought he said that McNabb wasn't all that and was getting props because people wanted a black guy to succeed at quarterback. So what? So what? Don't y'all want to see a black quarterback make it, yo? I do. So the sports media guys, he said they want him to succeed, what's the big deal? Is there a problem here, yo? And McNabb? You a punk, yo. Now, my NFL brothers, let me ask you a question here. Who was it that whipped Michael Vick a new one after he got done in the joint?

Was it Rush? Nope. It was a bunch of your white liberal sportswriter guys pretending they loved their dogs more than they loved their wives, okay? That's who ripped all over Michael Vick. Who's been ripping Plaxico, who's been ripping Pac-Man? Every time y'all get going... Who was it that ran T.O. on up out of Dallas, yo? Okay, was it Rush? No. Okay? Now for all of you homeys, this is outside the NFL. For all my brothers and sisters, y'all want to get pissed off about somebody insulting black people? Why don't y'all watch BET, Black "Exploitation" Television, okay? You want to know who's calling black women, "Bitches ho this, bitches ho that"? Is it Rush Limbaugh? No. Who's telling y'all that all you can do is jiggle your butts on TV? Is it Rush Limbaugh? Rush ain't your enemy, yo. You know what the biggest threat to black men is in America, yo?

It ain't Rush Limbaugh. It's other black men who are killing off brothers like they did that young boy out in Chicago, okay? A quarter of our brothers don't even make it to be age 25 'cause they get shot up by other black men. Is Rush out there pulling the trigger? No. And y'all brothers, you got anything to say about it? Especially y'all in the NFL. Y'all get paid, y'all leave the hood, that's that. Not a word. Okay? Now, for all of y'all who live deep in the hood, I got another question: Is it Rush Limbaugh stopping your kids from being educated in your run-down schools, in your run-down-ass neighborhoods? No. Who is it? And where's Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson on that instead of flapping their mouth about all this other stuff that they don't know anything else about? How come Al, Jesse, and y'all are living large and the 'hood is still the 'hood? That concludes my statement.

RUSH: That's the Official Obama Criticizer, Bo Snerdley.
Balloon guy
And here's a story about how Obama adiminstration was a big player in this whole deal and how it went down.

QUOTE
October 16, 2009
Limbaugh Targeted By Obama Official
Joseph Ashby
The plot thickens on the media’s character-lynching of Rush Limbaugh. Of the four stories run on ESPN.com about Limbaugh’s bid for the Rams (October 6, October 12, October 15, and another October 15) none of them mention that NFL Players Association Executive Director DeMaurice Smith served as counsel to Attorney General Eric Holder and was a member of Barack Obama’s transition team.

The October 12 article references Smith’s anti-Limbaugh email meant to garner opposition against the radio host’s bid. The report refers to Smith only as the executive director of the NFLPA. Despite the fact that Smith’s opposition was based on Limbaugh’s political commentary, the report failed to mention that Smith’s political connections (including those to whom he donated thousands of dollars) have a vested interest in Limbaugh’s discrediting.

The October 15 article (the last of four listed above) is decidedly negative toward Limbaugh, portraying him as paranoid about Obama’s involvement in the decision. The report states:


Limbaugh blamed Smith, executive director of the NFLPA and an "Obama-ite," along with Sharpton and Jackson, whom he referred to as "race hustlers," for Checketts' decision to drop him. He said his sacking was an example of the political clout wielded by President Barack Obama's administration.


There is no mention in the piece of Smith’s relationship with Holder or his work on the Obama transition.

It is not as if ESPN didn’t know of Smith’s history. The sports web site ran a report in July which stated:


In selecting Smith this year, the union chose Washington smarts over football experience. Smith, a Washington lawyer, served on the Obama transition team and also worked for Eric Holder before Holder became attorney general.


Smith’s gross conflict of interest and apparent political targeting of Obama’s top foe is a huge story. Unfortunately the media appears too blinded by their prejudice of Limbaugh to report on it.

To summarize, we know that a former Obama official and political ally--who was chosen by the NFLPA specifically for his political clout and connections to the highest rungs of power in government--directly attacked Limbaugh for the radio-talker’s political commentary.

Historically politicians have been prone to vindictive and petty behavior, but never in American history has someone had so much power to pummel his political opponents as President Obama. With control over banks, insurance companies, car companies, media (sports media included) and unions (like the NFL players union), Obama tentacles seem to penetrate into nearly every corner of the nation.

JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 2:28 PM) *
yeah, you have to be a member to read that, so pass.

Did you hear Stephen A Smith and Jason Whitlock discussing this on the LeBatard show?
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 5:02 PM) *
Did you hear Stephen A Smith and Jason Whitlock discussing this on the LeBatard show?



I did..
JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 3:23 PM) *
I did..

Cool.





















Anyway, the reason I brought it up is I thought Whitlock had the best argument so far against Rush. Whether you agree with Rush or not, you can't deny that he is at the center of controversy fairly often and it's not really in the league's best interest to have to answer to it all the time. It doesn't matter if the radio show is separate from the NFL, the media is still going to ask players about whatever the current controversy is.

I thought it was a valid point even though I don't believe that's the reason for him being shut out.
Balloon guy
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 3:37 PM) *
Anyway, the reason I brought it up is I thought Whitlock had the best argument so far against Rush. Whether you agree with Rush or not, you can't deny that he is at the center of controversy fairly often and it's not really in the league's best interest to have to answer to it all the time. It doesn't matter if the radio show is separate from the NFL, the media is still going to ask players about whatever the current controversy is.

I thought it was a valid point even though I don't believe that's the reason for him being shut out.



Yea, Marge Schott really distracted us all from the game of baseball...oh wait, that was the players walking out and screwing the entire support industry for major league baseball because they weren't happy with their multi million dollar contracts.



Funny because I don't even watch hardly any sports on tv...besides poker I mean
JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (Balloon guy @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 3:50 PM) *
Yea, Marge Schott really distracted us all from the game of baseball...

Do you think she would've been allowed to become an owner after she made her controversial comments?
Zealous Donkey
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 5:37 PM) *
Cool Anyway, the reason I brought it up is I thought Whitlock had the best argument so far against Rush. Whether you agree with Rush or not, you can't deny that he is at the center of controversy fairly often and it's not really in the league's best interest to have to answer to it all the time. It doesn't matter if the radio show is separate from the NFL, the media is still going to ask players about whatever the current controversy is.

I thought it was a valid point even though I don't believe that's the reason for him being shut out.


I thought they both made some good points, but Whitlock misrepresented quotes by Limbaugh, and Stephan Smith, who claims to be a listener, never corrected him.

The Limbaugh quotes on Obama's being an america where white children are beat up by black children, was a complete misrepresentation of the point Limbaugh was making. He was simply applying the exact same standard and language to those who support Obama that a Time Magazine Article, (or Newsweek) held white America to, which basically charactorized whites that grow up in America as inheriently racist. I did listen to Rush when He was talking about this, but I haven't read the article though I will try to find it and read it if it is online.

I don't no whether Whitlock is simply not intelligent enough to get the obvious point being made by Limbaugh, or if he simply read the quote somewhere else and did no more research before commenting on it, either way It takes away from his credibility. Whitlock also called a player, who had stated that he would have no problem playing for Limbaugh. an idiot.

Both seemed to believe there was only one side to be on in this issue. These two are exactly why we will never have a real discussion on race in this country.

Also, I found it hypocritical of Smith in one minute to critisize, blacks for being uninformed and voting blindly democrtic, then in the next minute basically called any african american who would play for Limbaugh a sellout. He and Whtilcock both agreed that black players should all be in lockstep agreement that Limbaugh is antiblack and someone they must take a stand against.
JoeyJoJo
Edit: I think you edited your post right before I started replying...


Anyway, I think you're making too big of a deal about the bus comment that seems to be the go to comment to show Rush is a racist.

Both of them had differing views on the subject; did you expect them to come out and defend Rush?

Whitlock's point was that Rush was too controversial, not that he was anti-black.

I don't remember Smith calling anyone a sellout. I do remember him challenging black athletes to become involved rather than just taking a paycheck. I don't see that as a bad thing. I also don't think telling people that they should become informed rather than just listening to what the media says is a bad thing either.
Zealous Donkey
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM) *
Edit: I think you edited your post right before I started replying...





QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM) *
Anyway, I think you're making too big of a deal about the bus comment that seems to be the go to comment to show Rush is a racist.


I think you may be downplaying it too much. Whitlock kept bringing it up. I really would like to know if he actually heard what Rush said on the subject.

QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM) *
Both of them had differing views on the subject; did you expect them to come out and defend Rush?


I didn't see there views as that different.

QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM) *
Whitlock's point was that Rush was too controversial, not that he was anti-black.


That was a valid point, though why call the player an idiot who stated he wouldn't have a problem playing for Rush.

QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM) *
I don't remember Smith calling anyone a sellout. I do remember him challenging black athletes to become involved rather than just taking a paycheck. I don't see that as a bad thing. I also don't think telling people that they should become informed rather than just listening to what the media says is a bad thing either.


He didn't literally call anyone a sellout, but he seemed to not only call todays athletes, but those past, as sellouts, otherwise what was his point?

I agreed with his point about becoming informed wholeheartedly, but I saw inconsitency when he seemed, to me, to be calling out African American athletes that refused to take a stand against Limbaugh.

If his point was simply to hope for black athletes "to become involved rather than just accepting a paycheck" I could agree with him, but to me he seemed to prefer to have them take a stand against Limbaugh, and for them not to do so would be cowardly. He wanted to see how many would stand up.

I would just like to comment that the discussion in this thread is about 1000 times more civil than any other I have seen on the web. I have read several other threads on the subject, most at STLtoday.com, but you can't get through one page without the whole discussion dropping into the sewer.

This is a good place to have these kinds of discussion and I am thankful to FCP and its members.

Edit. A couple of more points.

Is anyone else concerned with the way the term "divisive" is being thrown around? Rush Limbaugh wasn't fit to own an NFL team because he is divisive. Well isn't anyone who makes a stand on anything, by exercising their first amendment rights, being divisive?

Also, I wish Lebatard had asked Whitlock and Smith about the ramifications this is going to have on other NFL minority owners. I would bet alot of information is going to surface about other owners who could reasonable be seen as divisive or otherwise reflect poorly on the NFL. Of course the media probably will refuse to report anything, but that still doesn't excuse the NFL of their hypocracy.
Zealous Donkey
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405...IGHTTopCarousel
Balloon guy
QUOTE (Zealous Donkey @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 9:42 PM) *


Here's the link's story


QUOTE
By RUSH LIMBAUGH
David Checketts, an investor and owner of sports teams, approached me in late May about investing in the St. Louis Rams football franchise. As a football fan, I was intrigued. I invited him to my home where we discussed it further. Even after informing him that some people might try to make an issue of my participation, Mr. Checketts said he didn't much care. I accepted his offer.

It didn't take long before my name was selectively leaked to the media as part of the Checketts investment group. Shortly thereafter, the media elicited comments from the likes of Al Sharpton. In 1998 Mr. Sharpton was found guilty of defamation and ordered to pay $65,000 for falsely accusing a New York prosecutor of rape in the 1987 Tawana Brawley case. He also played a leading role in the 1991 Crown Heights riot (he called neighborhood Jews "diamond merchants") and 1995 Freddie's Fashion Mart riot.

View Full Image

Associated Press

Rush Limbaugh
.Not to be outdone, Jesse Jackson, whose history includes anti-Semitic speech (in 1984 he referred to Jews as "Hymies" and to New York City as "Hymietown" in a Washington Post interview) chimed in. He found me unfit to be associated with the NFL. I was too divisive and worse. I was accused of once supporting slavery and having praised Martin Luther King Jr.'s murderer, James Earl Ray.

Next came writers in the sports world, like the Washington Post's Michael Wilbon. He wrote this gem earlier this week: "I'm not going to try and give specific examples of things Limbaugh has said over the years because I screwed up already doing that, repeating a quote attributed to Limbaugh (about slavery) which he has told me he simply did not say and does not reflect his feelings. I take him at his word. . . . "

Mr. Wilbon wasn't alone. Numerous sportswriters, CNN, MSNBC, among others, falsely attributed to me statements I had never made. Their sources, as best I can tell, were Wikipedia and each other. But the Wikipedia post was based on a fabrication printed in a book that also lacked any citation to an actual source.

I never said I supported slavery and I never praised James Earl Ray. How sick would that be? Just as sick as those who would use such outrageous slanders against me or anyone else who never even thought such things. Mr. Wilbon refuses to take responsibility for his poison pen, writing instead that he will take my word that I did not make these statements; others, like Rick Sanchez of CNN, essentially used the same sleight-of-hand.

The sports media elicited comments from a handful of players, none of whom I can recall ever meeting. Among other things, at least one said he would never play for a team I was involved in given my racial views. My racial views? You mean, my belief in a colorblind society where every individual is treated as a precious human being without regard to his race? Where football players should earn as much as they can and keep as much as they can, regardless of race? Those controversial racial views?

The NFL players union boss, DeMaurice Smith, jumped in. A Washington criminal defense lawyer, Democratic Party supporter and Barack Obama donor, he sent a much publicized email to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell saying that it was important for the league to reject discrimination and hatred.

When Mr. Goodell was asked about me, he suggested that my 2003 comment criticizing the media's coverage of Donovan McNabb—in which I said the media was cheerleading Mr. McNabb because they wanted a successful black quarterback—fell short of the NFL's "high standard." High standard? Half a decade later, the media would behave the same way about the presidential candidacy of Mr. Obama.

Having brought me into his group, Mr. Checketts now wanted a way out. He asked me to resign. I told him no way. I had done nothing wrong. I had not uttered the words these people were putting in my mouth. And I would not bow to their libels and pressure. He would have to drop me from the group. A few days later, he did.

As I explained on my radio show, this spectacle is bigger than I am on several levels. There is a contempt in the news business, including the sportswriter community, for conservatives that reflects the blind hatred espoused by Messrs. Sharpton and Jackson. "Racism" is too often their sledgehammer. And it is being used to try to keep citizens who don't share the left's agenda from participating in the full array of opportunities this nation otherwise affords each of us. It was on display many years ago in an effort to smear Clarence Thomas with racist stereotypes and keep him off the Supreme Court. More recently, it was employed against patriotic citizens who attended town-hall meetings and tea-party protests.

These intimidation tactics are working and spreading, and they are a cancer on our society.

Mr. Limbaugh is a nationally syndicated talk radio host.
85suited
Rick Sanchez apologized for his Bogus quote & Huffington Post has since deleted the comments saying the can't substantiate the quote
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.