Zealous Donkey
Friday, October 16th, 2009, 4:18 PM
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM)

Edit: I think you edited your post right before I started replying...
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM)

Anyway, I think you're making too big of a deal about the bus comment that seems to be the go to comment to show Rush is a racist.
I think you may be downplaying it too much. Whitlock kept bringing it up. I really would like to know if he actually heard what Rush said on the subject.
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM)

Both of them had differing views on the subject; did you expect them to come out and defend Rush?
I didn't see there views as that different.
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM)

Whitlock's point was that Rush was too controversial, not that he was anti-black.
That was a valid point, though why call the player an idiot who stated he wouldn't have a problem playing for Rush.
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Friday, October 16th, 2009, 6:41 PM)

I don't remember Smith calling anyone a sellout. I do remember him challenging black athletes to become involved rather than just taking a paycheck. I don't see that as a bad thing. I also don't think telling people that they should become informed rather than just listening to what the media says is a bad thing either.
He didn't literally call anyone a sellout, but he seemed to not only call todays athletes, but those past, as sellouts, otherwise what was his point?
I agreed with his point about becoming informed wholeheartedly, but I saw inconsitency when he seemed, to me, to be calling out African American athletes that refused to take a stand against Limbaugh.
If his point was simply to hope for black athletes "to become involved rather than just accepting a paycheck" I could agree with him, but to me he seemed to prefer to have them take a stand against Limbaugh, and for them not to do so would be cowardly. He wanted to see how many would stand up.
I would just like to comment that the discussion in this thread is about 1000 times more civil than any other I have seen on the web. I have read several other threads on the subject, most at STLtoday.com, but you can't get through one page without the whole discussion dropping into the sewer.
This is a good place to have these kinds of discussion and I am thankful to FCP and its members.
Edit. A couple of more points.
Is anyone else concerned with the way the term "divisive" is being thrown around? Rush Limbaugh wasn't fit to own an NFL team because he is divisive. Well isn't anyone who makes a stand on anything, by exercising their first amendment rights, being divisive?
Also, I wish Lebatard had asked Whitlock and Smith about the ramifications this is going to have on other NFL minority owners. I would bet alot of information is going to surface about other owners who could reasonable be seen as divisive or otherwise reflect poorly on the NFL. Of course the media probably will refuse to report anything, but that still doesn't excuse the NFL of their hypocracy.