Zach6668
Friday, October 2nd, 2009, 6:27 PM
QUOTE (nutzbuster @ Friday, October 2nd, 2009, 8:49 PM)

Agree and guilty as charged. I really should go more. Problem is I don;t really know many hockey fans here, and then the stadium moved over an hour away where it was before right downtown and very close to me. I know, sorta weak excuse but not so weak too if you've ever been in Phoenix traffic.
I think one of the main problems with Hockey here is the incredible weather here, the diversity of this area, and proximity to fun places like L.A., Colorado, Vegas etc. Point being, growing up in colder climates gets you much closer to the game in several ways. You can be coooped up alot and watching hockey is a great way to kill time, and then there are all the amateur hockey clubs and school teams back there. Getting outside and actually playing really cements a persons taste for the game way that is impossible to duplicate here. The whole dynamic is different. Not saying that a hockey club in a warm climate can't work obv, just that it is going to be much harder to be successful there.
But I think they did OK, for a while anyway, and I thought it have gone better than it ultimately has. I thought there were enough Canadian visitors (tons here in the winter) and transplants from places like Detroit, Chicago, etc. to keep it alive. But it seems like all the other distractions and competition for the entertainment dollars is much more formidable than anticipated. It is a tough sell out here clearly.
This is all stuff that takes a lot of time. That's the whole reason Bettman and Co. want to stick with these new markets for as long as possible. It takes a lot of time. The NHL expanded into areas like California in 1967 and we are just now finally seeing the first pro players from the area. It takes a lot of time to build up minor programs to the point where they can start developing local NHL stars, which in turn generates more interest locally, and so on.
Pittsburgh is a similar example, although they've had hockey for a hundred years. Once the Pens were created in 1967 it started the whole transition for that city into a hockey town, and now there are a handful of guys from Pittsburgh in the NHL, and minor hockey and men's leagues are thriving there.
It can happen in sunbelt cities, it's just something that needs to take a lot of time. The problem is, pro sports teams have a hard enough time making money in even good markets. There's only a handful of teams in all the major sports who will post profits even during their worst seasons. No owners want to suck up a bunch of losses to turn a team into a business that earns a profit on and off in a cyclical manner.
I don't really think it's the fans fault, though, as I implied earlier, I just think too many hockey fans in places like Phoenix are apathetic towards the team. I know the rink is in an awful location, we have the same problem here in Ottawa, but probably to a lesser degree given the sizes of our cities, and the fact that we're Canadian, so we're predisposed to spend an hour in traffic just to get to the rink.
Bottom line is, though, as I mentioned before, the way to grow the game, the sport in a new city is to start with the kids. Develop the minor league programs and get kids playing the game. That way they start to watch the NHL, start to root for the home team, develop heroes on the home team, etc. That, though, takes a lot of time, and it's tough to be patient enough for it to play out.
So, basically, I know what Bettman is thinking when he disagrees with all those who say the sunbelt experiments failed. I think he thinks it's too early to tell. It still might work, it might not, but it's a long term situation and the league doesn't want to give up on it a quarter of the way through the process.
I'm rambling, and a bit all over the place.