Fox new ad in Washington post


Rick Sanchez on air response
http://www.thrfeed.com/2009/09/cnn-rick-sa...ews-video-.html

CNN reply ad
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=igZZzs3MR7Y

24hr news seems alot like professional wrestling now a days.

looking forward to a 5 man battle royal. who would fight? one thing is for sure: glenn beck is heel.

CNN,MSN,and the Nets are a joke...

If 50 people showed in Washington to protest the war or banks or wall street it would be first segment news.


in February 2003, during the lead-up to the Iraq war, CNN aired a two-hour special report, “Voices of Dissent,” which was devoted to an anti-war protest organized by International ANSWER, a radical left-wing organization. The following month on March 22, 2003 CNN broadcast 38 separate reports on another anti-Iraq war demonstration. On the other hand, CNN personalities recently labeled anti-Obama protesters 'insane.' There’s no way that Sanchez’s claim, that CNN “covered it as well, probably less than we covered” the Tea Party, can be accurate.

How they can't report on a story ACORN fraud when they are eligible for 4 billion dollars of your tax money is beyond me..

They are either too stupid or complicit

Dems watch CNN ~ anti rush limbaugh and co
Rep watch FOX ~ anti barack obama (but its not because he is black)

so that will fall into the catagory of what you are is what you watch
that might be painting a broad stoke of everyone but it is what it is

wait, wait, wait. You watch Fox??

I don't watch a lot of televised news coverage. However I don't recall seeing a single "headline" on CNN's web page related to this story - until their response to FOX's ad.

How did you guess?

How do you not cover the ACORN scandal? 4 Billion of Tax Payers fund available and it isn't newsworthy?

Especially since Obama told us all during the election how important it was to be a community organizer


Each network was offered the ACORN tapes before FOX and passed..

The liberal bias in the media is nothing new. What is new is that all of the MSM have dropped all pretense to being objective. It is not uncommon for them to flaunt their support for Obama and his policies.

I don't know what effect this will have in the long run. I do think the general public is catching on that they aren't getting the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth from the media and that the media has an agenda one and the same as the president.

As this sinks in the MSM will continue their decline, until the pretense is dropped altogether and we have an offical State Run media, aside from PBS.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-roo...er-bailout-bill

I think the MSM saw how successful FoxNews has been going the "drop all pretenses, hyper-partisan route" so to try and not go the way of the dodo like newspapers they are copying the format.

It would be nice to have ONE unbiased news source.

For straight news I think Fox is unbiased.

Their 'bias' is just in their commentators.

When it's news times, it's 90% "White girl missing let's all focus on creepy guy X" etc.


After all: They report, You decide

Well you have to go outside the US to find them but BBC and CBC are pretty good and I suggest everybody read The Economist, all their articles are available for free online. Best newsmagazine in the World without a doubt.

every news station is much more about commentators than straight news anyway. When people think FoxNews, they think Beck, Hannity, O'Reilly....not whoever does the boring, old regular news. Same for MSNBC. People think Matthews and Olbermann not whoever does the boring stuff.

That's probably a huge part of the problem....

Pretty much all of Fox and MSNBC as well as a lot of CNN is unwatchable.

The only shows I watch are Meet the Press and George Stephanopoulos (and sometimes the McLaughlin Group... but don't tell anybody).

You should add this show to the mix from CNN, really good show on International Affairs.

http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/fareed.zakaria.gps/

Plus he was the one who told me about that healthcare article in The Atlantic

Oh, yeah, I've seen his show too. It's pretty good. I like that he's a smart guy and he listens to his guests and tries to get interesting information out of them. I mean, it sounds laughable when I have to spell out in such simple terms what makes a good news show, but so many fail to do to the obvious.

Well if you want to really want to save time, just listen to Rush Limbaugh for all your news.


He spends his weekends watching news programs etc and can break them all down to simple sound bites that are accurate 98.7% of the time.


I haven't watched a news program or read a paper in years because of this time saving technique.

He's the guy who said, "In Obama's America black kids beat up on white kids on school buses."

Sounds about right to me. I love CNN and whenever I watch Fox I want to punch everyone in the face. They yell WAAAAY more often on that network and yelling annoys me, regardless of what they are saying.

Rush Limbaugh is a piece of crap to me. I don't hate too many people, but him, Glen Beck, and Bill O'Reilly top my list of people I'd like to spit on.

Wow, your pretty nice, I have way more people than three, that I'd like to spit on..

That just blew me away when I read that. I had you pictured as a fun loving guy who at most would think those guys were just a bunch of loud mouth stoopid f**ks. The only thing I can think of is that you were trying to express your disdain for the trio and ended up slapping waay too much paint on the picture.

I listen to rush while I drive mostly for entertainment and there are times when I get 'embarrassed' for him and have to change the channel. other times I laugh out loud at the things that he says. but, hate.

tell me you were drinking sake when that was laid to print

For the record, it's the most retarded large-scale protest in American history. While Fox was nice enough to tell a bold-faced-lie about the other stations failing to cover it, it's really an embarrassment to humanity that this protest took place. Have you seen some of the signs these people were carrying? It was literally a protest by the retards.



[note to protester - using Holocaust imagery to say how you dislike Obama is horribly offensive to Holocaust survivors, and also to people with brains]


[A little late on that one brah. And why is Kenya in almost-quotation-marks?]



[Dude, what the shit are you talking about?]


[It's funny because he is a race other than white!! Hahaha! Speaking of which, look at all these non-whites at the protest!! Wait, what's that? You literally can't find a single non-white person in any photograph from the protest? Weird.]



[Good one.]



[Hahahaha we're all so white!]



[So he's like a Hitler-Joker? Did you really have to do both? I feel like it's just confusing. And on another note, this crowd is seriously whiter than the audience at a Celine Dion concert.]



[I can find no words to fully describe your idiocy.]

I always watched CNN when I was home during the day up until very recently. I only recently started watching Fox in the afternoon because Rick Sanchez annoys me. I'm thankful though because it caused me to discover Glenn Beck. I think Beck's show is the most important show on tv right now.

.

Yes he is total control and complete chaos at the same time!

proves my point that people in masses are more often dumb than intelligent

http://pubrecord.org/multimedia/5191/revea...h-really-about/

Why do you gotta make it about race?

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not, but I guess I have two responses: First, I was mostly trying to be funny (the operative word being 'trying'), and second, I dare you to find a black person anywhere at that protest!





Yikes. I mean, hippies (aka Dems) have a solid history of looking like idiots when confronted at a march like that, but...yikes.


EDIT: Ohhhh wow. The part toward the end where he starts educating people on czars was getting to be too painful to watch, until the dude goes "You know this how?" And that broke the tension, because it was hilarious.

wow. don't know what to say, really. unbelieveable.

dammit, if they just read wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czar#Metaphorical_uses

oh, i forgot, wikipedia is a leftist propaganda medium. my bad.

I'll raise you 25 Bush Bashing protest signs

You must have conveniently skipped the part where he had already raised himself in his other post.

FWIW, I did see 3 black people walking down the street in the very start of that video, but it's pretty obvious the only people who are thinking clearly and unbiased these days are the white man.

I think it is important to watch both CNN and Fox because when you mesh the two together you get perfect news. Two wrongs make a right ftw in this case.

That is why I watch The Daily show and The Colbert Report

I could not agree more. Beck's popularity should scare the ****ing shit out of any American with a brain. That is very important.

What is it that scares you about Glen Beck?

Do you dislike him asking questions of our government?

LOL. He is not asking questions of our government. He makes things up that have no basis in reality. I am still waiting for those FEMA camps to pop up. Most of what comes out of his mouth is complete BS. He is not asking the tough questions....he gets on TV and says things like "Obama has a deep seated hatred for white people." The guy is a bi-polar clown.....laughing about something one minute, then sobbing hysterically about some delusional dystopian fantasy the next.

There are plenty of smart, conservative commentators who have poked Obama's healthcare plan full of holes or taken him to task for bailing out too many people. Those are legitimate issues to raise with how our government is operating. Propping up fantasies like Obama was born in Kenya or Obama hates white people or Obama wants to kill your grandmother with the guns he takes away from you is not "asking questions". It's appealing to the lowest common denominator and taking advantage of the stupidity of people who are angry and dont know where to project that anger....something Fox News's commentators seem to have cornered the market on.

Beck is an attention-whore these days. Look at his statements last night on Katie Couric.

Beck said he may have voted for Hillary Clinton and that John McCain would have been worse for the country than Barack Obama.

He just likes to say things that will stir the pot.

He does the job that all media should be doing:

Asking who are these guys running the goverment - and that scares you because he is one of the few to actually tell the people about the ass clowns Obama has in his government.

Do you not like him talking about ACORN or his CZARS, or how SEIU has its hand in politics...?

or are you worried that everyday people will actually now vet obama when they missed the chance during the election cycle? That maybe he has woken them up to the things that the people here in this forum were concerned about before the election?

You know way back.when, ..Back.. Back when he was painted as a moderate Democrat by your Liberal Media Friends?

Who's more nuts, Glen Beck or the guy who thinks Glen Beck isn't nuts?

The guy who thinks Beck isn't nuts because there's a strong possibility that with Beck it's all just a game for him to become rich and famous.

But does that make me nuts since I think there's a chance that Beck isn't actually nuts but is just doing things that somebody who is nuts would do so that he can become rich and famous.

>> ? <<

This is perfect. Well done.

No Bob, the BBC's World Service may be quite good, but the corporation is generally a left-wing propaganda machine...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-41...s-BBC-News.html

That link is merely a tabloid article highlighting the fact that the news team admits to being biased. The reality is that in some of the UK domestic news reports and political coverage, the frightening propaganda techniques would make Goebbells proud...

.

my mom had to move the tv in their townhouse from the kitchen to the living room because my dad yelled at it so loudly the neighbors would stare when they walked by. true story.

All we see here in Canada is the World Service and it seems very down the middle of the road to me but I can't comment on their domestic UK coverage.

lol. wp bob.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/thu-augu...eck-s-operation

I listen to Rush often, heard this show, heard what he said and what other are reporting he said.

The two things are not equal.


But Rush is the perfect barometer to test if a person is willing to think for themselves or just listen to their political side tell them what to think.


I have listened to Rush for over 15 years, he speaks for 3 hours a day, almost every work day, (for a paltry $50,000 an hour)

Yet someone reports one sound bite taken out of context or meaning and try to pigeon hole Rush into some caricature that doesn't exist. You have to be crazy to believe that a person like that would have the largest audience in the history of radio for over a decade.


But if you are cool thinking that you 'know' Rush after listening to a few reports by people that don't like him...then I guess you aren't open to experiencing one of the best 3 hours in radio everyday.


I would think that as a person in the limelight of society, you should know better than most that just because there is a story or report about a person and what he supposedly said, it doesn't make it true. If I wanted to show someone just a few snippets of your blogs, I can make you look like anything I want, from racist to nazi to homophobe to Hellmuth lover.