Southern Buddhist
Friday, February 5th, 2010, 11:30 AM
QUOTE (brvheart @ Wednesday, February 3rd, 2010, 4:05 PM)

I was joking about what I said to try to stir up some controversy. The same verse says that you should be able to move mountains as well (not literally, but I assume you know that), so I'm not sure why that church is just sticking with snakes when they could be moving around the Appalachians.
Evidently the mountains are fine where they are, but snakes and poison need some human lovin' now and then. I have no idea what they're thinking. [Well, yeah, I do. They're cunning enough to realize that a 100% failure to literally move a mountain would reflect badly on their sect. As it is, they call every bite-free handling a win for faith and every bite the work of Satan. It's the religious version of Spademan's sig file.]
I didn't think you were advocating snake handling at all. But it is interesting to me how similar two religious things can be (snake handlers and voodoo initiates, bombing abortion clinics and bombing a disco) and yet what different reactions they solicit, by people who seem blind to the similarities.
Also interesting that so many faiths strive to achieve ecstatic states of transcendence, and all the different paths they take to get there. From Druids to Zeus and Leda to Holy Rollers, humanity seems to want little more than to be possessed by god(s). Offhand, Buddhism is the only one I can think of that seems not to.
Also, when I hear people speak of the "Holy Ghost," I subtract 100 IQ points. Although "Casper the Friendly Ghost" and "Casper the Friendly Spirit" are more or less synonymous, we do not hold "the spirit of freedom/America/the law/St. Louis" to be synonymous with the "ghost" of those things. Besides, doesn't something have to be dead to be a ghost? My husband was always wildly amused by the He-Man cartoons, in which the ghost of Skeletor and the character of Skeletor existed simultaneously (and he's a skeleton, making the whole thing triply implausible!).