DinkDonk
Friday, January 2nd, 2009, 9:53 PM
QUOTE (antistuff @ Saturday, January 3rd, 2009, 12:33 AM)

lately ive noticed that people will call down on a board like that with 66 even if you manage to raise them on the turn. i dont feel like i have a lot of fold equity on that board against a 3 better, so yes in this situation i also play my draws passively.
But isn't that a reason to raise with the AT aaaaand the draws? I mean say you have K9s here, you've got like 55% equity (or whatever it is) vs. that 66 anyway and he's not going to fire 3 streets for value on most turns and rivers with that type of hand. Also, I know that with a draw that good keeping the 3rd opponent in isn't necessarily bad, but what if we clean up all K outs and maybe give ourselves some bluff outs like Q's and J's by driving the 3rd player out. And if the bettor's calling down with those 66 type hands anyway, I think we can agree that an A this good is not only ahead of his flop-betting range, but his call-down range as well right?
*This is all advocating a flop raise, not a turn raise btw.
IMO the call, call, call line is best only vs. either a very balanced, very good opponent or a super bluffy opponent who isn't that showdown bound. (I may be missing some player types here, but this is pretty off the cuff stuff anyway, just trying to prompt discussion.)