Emptyeye
Saturday, May 14th, 2005, 9:08 AM
Yeah, given no reads, I don't particularly mind the way you played it, basically for the reasons you said--as I've said before, "Pushing with the nuts?! Seriously! Who does that?!? Well, someone who knows you'll look at the push and say 'Pushing with the nuts?! Seriously! Who does that?!?'".
Weak-leading is a viable option, but if he's a reasonable player he'll be VERY suspicious of it (When someone weak-leads at me for a minimum bet, I just call given no prior reads. Why? They're usually trying to accomplish one of two things--they have a weak hand and am praying I'll fold, or they have a monster and hoping I'll "sense weakness" and raise. Either way, calling is precisely what they DON'T want me to do. Of course, I'm not this guy), particularly since your raise pre-flop should tip him of that you could very well be slowplaying an ace or (Possibly) a pocket pair higher than his tens post-flop.
Truthfully, though, hitting quads (Particularly pre-river) doesn't really happen enough that how you play it is going to make much of a difference one way or the other. Thus, given you managed to double up, I'd consider it successful even if I wouldn't necessarily play it this way.

I had a similar situation and proceeded to play it check/call-check/call/check-raise all-in, and STILL doubled up. In hindsight, the play was terrible (Final board of 7AAAJ, guy had 7-9 for the baby boat), but it doubled my chips, so I consider it well-played.

Like I said, quads are rare enough that it's one of the few times you can look at the results and determine whether it was a good or bad play.