Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Hall Of Fame
FCP Poker Forum > Off Topic Forums > Sports- Baseball
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (slink @ Monday, April 27th, 2009, 5:01 PM) *
bonds yes

Palmiero yes

sosa yes

mcgwire yes

the needle... yes



I actually agree. The best players of the steriod era need to be put in the hall.
slink
There should be a standard for closers, a la 500 homeruns and 300 victories.

Something like 400 saves.

1 Trevor Hoffman 575
2 Mariano Rivera 507
3 Lee Smith 478
4 John Franco 424
5 Dennis Eckersley 390
6 Billy Wagner 385
7 Jeff Reardon 367
8 Troy Percival 358
9 Randy Myers 347
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (slink @ Sunday, July 19th, 2009, 8:46 PM) *
There should be a standard for closers, a la 500 homeruns and 300 victories.

Something like 400 saves.

1 Trevor Hoffman 575
2 Mariano Rivera 507
3 Lee Smith 478
4 John Franco 424
5 Dennis Eckersley 390
6 Billy Wagner 385
7 Jeff Reardon 367
8 Troy Percival 358
9 Randy Myers 347




In a game filled with overrated statistics, I think the save is the most overrated one. I think closers should be judged on other statistical measures besides saves.
slink
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Monday, July 20th, 2009, 11:39 PM) *
In a game filled with overrated statistics, I think the save is the most overrated one. I think closers should be judged on other statistical measures besides saves.



Agree with that, but like what?



To get to 400 saves would require an average of 33+ saves for 12 years, (at least that's one way). Seems pretty Hall of Famish to me.
fleung22
QUOTE (slink @ Tuesday, July 21st, 2009, 4:23 PM) *
Agree with that, but like what?



To get to 400 saves would require an average of 33+ saves for 12 years, (at least that's one way). Seems pretty Hall of Famish to me.


think saves count but obviously you need a stat for great closers playing on crappy teams. maybe min. innings pitched and ERA?
GeneralGeeWhiz
Will Clark should be in, but he will never get enough votes.

I've got a good one, Jeff Kent. Does he deserve to get in?
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (GeneralGeeWhiz @ Sunday, July 26th, 2009, 1:53 PM) *
Will Clark should be in, but he will never get enough votes.



LOL silly giants fan

QUOTE
I've got a good one, Jeff Kent. Does he deserve to get in?


Considering the way he hit at the position he played? Absolutely.
Sportsmack
QUOTE (GeneralGeeWhiz @ Sunday, July 26th, 2009, 11:53 AM) *
Will Clark should be in, but he will never get enough votes.


You're thinking of the 'Hicks of Fame.'

Today was really all about 1 person...Ricky baby!! I'll be at the A's/Toronto game this coming Saturday for the A's tribute to Ricky...can't wait!
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (Sportsmack @ Sunday, July 26th, 2009, 2:34 PM) *
You're thinking of the 'Hicks of Fame.'

Today was really all about 1 person...Ricky baby!! I'll be at the A's/Toronto game this coming Saturday for the A's tribute to Ricky...can't wait!




I think rickey is like a super hall of famer, like the top of the top, in the all time outfield maybe even.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Sunday, July 26th, 2009, 12:39 PM) *
I think rickey is like a super hall of famer, like the top of the top, in the all time outfield maybe even.



If you were making an all time team in a practical way, you would almost have to include Rickey. He is the prototype for a leadoff hitter. High OBP, best base runner of all time, even occasional power for fun.

The only way I would leave him off is if I decided to make Cobb the leadoff hitter instead. But I dont know what Ty's stance was on referring to himself in the third person. Crucial info.

Rickey gets underestimated because he was such a clown and because he hung on way way too long. Makes people forget what a special player he was.

Oh, and Will Clark was my favorite player when I was little (I did not know he was kind of a prick at the time) but NO WAY he deserves to be in the HoF. no way.
Sportsmack
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Sunday, July 26th, 2009, 12:39 PM) *
I think rickey is like a super hall of famer, like the top of the top, in the all time outfield maybe even.


Rickey appreciates what you said about Rickey.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Sunday, July 26th, 2009, 2:44 PM) *
If you were making an all time team in a practical way, you would almost have to include Rickey. He is the prototype for a leadoff hitter. High OBP, best base runner of all time, even occasional power for fun.

The only way I would leave him off is if I decided to make Cobb the leadoff hitter instead. But I dont know what Ty's stance was on referring to himself in the third person. Crucial info.

Rickey gets underestimated because he was such a clown and because he hung on way way too long. Makes people forget what a special player he was.

Oh, and Will Clark was my favorite player when I was little (I did not know he was kind of a prick at the time) but NO WAY he deserves to be in the HoF. no way.



His 1990 season is insane, and might be the best fantasy baseball season of any player ever, I'm so proud of baseball writers for voting him MVP.. Check it out..

Things that are starred are leading the league..

Runs 119* doubles 33 hrs 28 RBI 61 ( for a lead off hitter? LOL) SB 65 * BB 97 BA 325 OBP 439 * slugging 577 (WTF?) OPS 1.016* (WTF?) OPS+ 188*

The type of OPS' the guy would put up, as a lead off hitter, were unreal


Here's a snippet from a Joe Posnanski in Rickey's wiki, that made me just shake my head when I thought about it..

QUOTE
"I’m about to give you one of my all-time favorite statistics: Rickey Henderson walked 796 times in his career LEADING OFF AN INNING. Think about this again. There would be nothing, absolutely nothing, a pitcher would want to avoid more than walking Rickey Henderson to lead off an inning. And yet he walked SEVEN HUNDRED NINETY SIX times to lead off an inning.
He walked more times just leading off in an inning than Lou Brock, Roberto Clemente, Luis Aparicio, Ernie Banks, Kirby Puckett, Ryne Sandberg and more than 50 other Hall of Famers walked in their entire careers...I simply cannot imagine a baseball statistic more staggering."[94]

GeneralGeeWhiz
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Sunday, July 26th, 2009, 12:44 PM) *
Oh, and Will Clark was my favorite player when I was little (I did not know he was kind of a prick at the time) but NO WAY he deserves to be in the HoF. no way.


meh, you guys are right. smile.gif pretty good stats tho.

lifetime 303 avg, 2100+ hits, 282 homeruns, lifetime 880 ops, 1100+ rbis, lifetime 440 doubles, plus that epic grand slam in game 1 of the 1989 NLCS @ the cubs. I am biased though because he is my favorite Giant ever. I grew up worshiping the guy. smile.gif

Sportsmack, Rickey was and still IS the man. smile.gif his speech had me cracking up.
dEv~
QUOTE (dEv~ @ Monday, July 27th, 2009, 1:13 PM) *

"And let me close my speech with one final thought -- Hey, Rickey, you're so fine, you're so fine you blow my mind. Hey, Rickey. Hey, Rickey!"
http://www.sportspickle.com/pictures


I put this in the A's thread but it fits here too.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (GeneralGeeWhiz @ Monday, July 27th, 2009, 12:56 PM) *
meh, you guys are right. smile.gif pretty good stats tho.

lifetime 303 avg, 2100+ hits, 282 homeruns, lifetime 880 ops, 1100+ rbis, lifetime 440 doubles, plus that epic grand slam in game 1 of the 1989 NLCS @ the cubs. I am biased though because he is my favorite Giant ever. I grew up worshiping the guy. smile.gif

Sportsmack, Rickey was and still IS the man. smile.gif his speech had me cracking up.



yeah, I'm a big Mark Grace guy too. He has the most hits ( and I think doubles) of the 90's, but it doesn't mean I think he's an HOFer.



And rickey is god. That speech was truly HOF.
Sportsmack
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Monday, July 27th, 2009, 11:57 AM) *
yeah, I'm a big Mark Grace guy too. He has the most hits ( and I think doubles) of the 90's, but it doesn't mean I think he's an HOFer.


He gets in for inventing the term 'slump buster' alone.

QUOTE
And rickey is god. That speech was truly HOF.


I just heard that Rickey actually went to Laney college in Oakland and practiced his speech on a speech class and had them critique it...simply awesome.
JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (slink @ Tuesday, August 5th, 2008, 10:42 AM) *
Any love out there for Bert Blyleven?

Comes up just five votes short (got 400, need 405). Has two more chances.

QUOTE (slink @ Tuesday, August 5th, 2008, 6:19 PM) *
How about Roberto Alomar?

Eight votes short on first try.



Andre Dawson is the only person elected this year (on his 9th try).


Sports Guy: I thought Andre Dawson deserved to make it this year over the other 8 years. He had an underrated 2008 season.
BigDMcGee
ANDRE GODSON!!!!!


My favorite all time player.. the way he came to the cubs was so epic... he was the MAN of those teams. I never thought he'd make the hall of fame, because his stats just aren't quite there (his OBP is particularly poor), and since he'd missed getting in so many times, I didn't see that he'd ever get it.....


But.....

I think he's probably a statement player... one of the last great pre-steroid era players.. it's a complete fraud that he gets in and Mark McGuire doesn't, but the votes want to send a message or something retarded.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Wednesday, January 6th, 2010, 7:53 PM) *
ANDRE GODSON!!!!!


My favorite all time player.. the way he came to the cubs was so epic... he was the MAN of those teams. I never thought he'd make the hall of fame, because his stats just aren't quite there (his OBP is particularly poor), and since he'd missed getting in so many times, I didn't see that he'd ever get it.....



You know your franchise is lacking history when.......

I received an email today from FloridaMarlins.com letting me know that former Marlin great Andre Dawson had been voted into the Hall of Fame. Yeah, former Marlin great, jackasses. He was a Cub who spent his last two years as a shell of his former self playing in Miami. Hilarious.

(I believe he spent some time in Montreal too, right?)
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Wednesday, January 6th, 2010, 10:50 PM) *
(I believe he spent some time in Montreal too, right?)



if Montreal was still a franchise, he might have gone into the hall as an expo. His best all around years were in Montreal.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Wednesday, January 6th, 2010, 11:56 PM) *
if Montreal was still a franchise, he might have gone into the hall as an expo. His best all around years were in Montreal.



So many great players spent their very early years in Montreal. I always liked going to games there. Not too many stadiums sell crepes.
Speed Limit
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Thursday, January 7th, 2010, 12:10 AM) *
So many great players spent their very early years in Montreal. I always liked going to games there. Not too many stadiums sell crepes.


One of my best baseball experiences were a few games I went to see in Montreal. Got some poutine, Vlad hit 2 bombs, Colon hit 100mph frequently, and it was my last chance to see Mo Vaughn play.
timwakefield
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Wednesday, January 6th, 2010, 2:45 PM) *
[blyleven] Comes up just five votes short (got 400, need 405). Has two more chances.


[alomar] Eight votes short on first try.


So they'll both definitely get in next year.


P.S. Andre Dawson is as much a Red Sock as he is a Marlin, and I honestly just had to look him up to make sure I didn't invent the fact that he was on the Sox for a season+ (I didn't). LOL @ Marlins great. He literally had less than 300 at bats as a Marlin.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (timwakefield @ Thursday, January 7th, 2010, 8:16 AM) *
So they'll both definitely get in next year.


P.S. Andre Dawson is as much a Red Sock as he is a Marlin, and I honestly just had to look him up to make sure I didn't invent the fact that he was on the Sox for a season+ (I didn't). LOL @ Marlins great. He literally had less than 300 at bats as a Marlin.



He was a bench coach there for a while, I'm pretty sure.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Thursday, January 7th, 2010, 11:53 AM) *
He was a bench coach there for a while, I'm pretty sure.



Yeah, and it would have been fine for them to celebrate that. It was the phrase "Marlins great" that slayed me.

Seriously, Marlins front office people, you generally do a great job of putting low cost-high reward teams on the field. You don't need to pretend Andre Dawson was a Marlins great.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Thursday, January 7th, 2010, 11:18 AM) *
Seriously, Marlins front office people, you generally do a great job of putting low cost-high reward teams on the field. You don't need to pretend Andre Dawson was a Marlins great.



lol Your south florida sports anger really tickles me, now that I'm both familiar with the teams ( from the DLS) and completely ambivalent to their success and failure.
uncooper
"I hope that most people focus on the deserving candidates who didn’t get in, like Bert Blyleven, Roberto Alomar (both of whom will almost certainly get elected next year), Tim Raines, Edgar Martinez and Barry Larkin, among others.

There are a lot of reasons that the BBWAA might have overlooked these guys, but I think the answer is pretty simple: BBWAA voters don’t appear to change the number of candidates that they vote for, regardless of the number of qualified candidates." [HarvardSportsAnalysis]
BigDMcGee
Roberto Alomar not getting in is a pure joke. Edgar Martinez also.. ****ing idiot baseball writers. The DH has been a legitimate position, for over 40 years... if you''re the best player ever at your position, you should be in the hall. Plus, there are so many 1 dimensional players in the hall, who were only good hitters ( and a couple only good fielders), and were detriments in the field.... So if Edgar Martinez has been a defensive liability at first base for 20 years, then he's a hall of famer? What sense does that make?
JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Thursday, January 7th, 2010, 2:49 PM) *
if you''re the best player ever at your position, you should be in the hall.

That's my "Ray Guy should be in the hall of fame" argument.
FCP Bob
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Thursday, January 7th, 2010, 5:49 PM) *
Roberto Alomar not getting in is a pure joke.


Watching Alomar every day when he was at his peak on the great Blue Jay teams of that time was so much fun. He had about the highest baseball IQ out there and would do whatever was needed at any given time. His anticipation on defense was amazing.
rivergirl
i still have trouble understanding how none of the 84 tigers are in the hall yet....i know the only reason morris hasn't been brought in yet is because he was such an ass to the press. I think the sportswriters are just making him sweat a little and they'll wait till he's in his last couple of years of eligibility to make it.

FWIW, i really really think they should just give pete rose a place in the hall...then again, i think i'm ok with the steroid crew also getting a nod when their times come. Sure the records may seem skewed because of the hitters juicing, but so were the pitchers so it kind of evens itself out. I believe there were alot more players doing it than not tbh , and you'll never find out about all of them. So just let them all in.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE
That's my "Ray Guy should be in the hall of fame" argument.


Should also be in the hall. I don't like the way the NFL inducts people into the hall, but putting a cap on the people every year. They should jsut put in how ever many they think belongs. Guy will have a hard time getting in, when they have a cap, because there are tons of backlogged players.
JoeyJoJo
The Hall of Fame should be the top 5% (+-? I'm not sure how the numbers actually work out) of all eligible players. If you reach your cap and a new player becomes eligible that you think deserves to be in, then you need to find somebody to take out.

Obviously this would never happen, but it sure would be fun.
JoeyJoJo
McGwire admits steroid use.

Shocking, I know.

He said he was on them off and on for nearly a decade, including his 70 HR year.

I wonder if this has anything to do with his lackluster hall of fame voting. I also wonder if voters will be more lenient to those that admit it.
king_tanner
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Monday, January 11th, 2010, 12:13 PM) *
McGwire admits steroid use.

Shocking, I know.

He said he was on them off and on for nearly a decade, including his 70 HR year.

I wonder if this has anything to do with his lackluster hall of fame voting. I also wonder if voters will be more lenient to those that admit it.


I think it has to do with the job he just got with the Cardinals, and nothing else. I'm guessing someone in the organization made him admit it if he wanted the job.

If I was a voter I still wouldn't ever vote for him.

Also, I think he is an even bigger scumbag after today.
Pot Odds RAC
QUOTE (king_tanner @ Monday, January 11th, 2010, 3:53 PM) *
...If I was a voter I still wouldn't ever vote for him...

What rule did he break? Were Steroids and HGH against the rules back then? I honestly don't know. Everyone calls him a "cheater" but were his actions actually cheating?
JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (Pot Odds RAC @ Tuesday, January 12th, 2010, 9:31 AM) *
What rule did he break? Were Steroids and HGH against the rules back then? I honestly don't know. Everyone calls him a "cheater" but were his actions actually cheating?

"The possession, sale or use of any illegal drug or controlled substance by Major League players or personnel is strictly prohibited ... This prohibition applies to all illegal drugs."

That's the old rule. So unless they were getting and using their steroids legally, it was against the rules.

I think what a lot of people are upset about is that MLB knew this was going on and did nothing to discourage it because they never tested for it.
3A
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Tuesday, January 12th, 2010, 9:47 AM) *
"The possession, sale or use of any illegal drug or controlled substance by Major League players or personnel is strictly prohibited ... This prohibition applies to all illegal drugs."

That's the old rule. So unless they were getting and using their steroids legally, it was against the rules.

I think what a lot of people are upset about is that MLB knew this was going on and did nothing to discourage it because they never tested for it.


Well let's use current HOF inductions as a gold standard. Were there any players who used illegal drugs in the HOF? Well 1919-1933 was the prohibition, at which point alchohol was illegal. In 1919 a young man by the name of Babe Ruth was sold to the New York Yankees. Babe Ruth very publically at times was disobeying this current illegal drug law.

I by no means want to say McGwire is anywhere close to Ruth on talent level or leaving his mark on the record books, however by letter of the rules "This prohibition applies to all illegal drugs."
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (JoeyJoJo @ Tuesday, January 12th, 2010, 11:47 AM) *
I think what a lot of people are upset about is that MLB knew this was going on and did nothing to discourage it because they never tested for it.



That's the crux of my issue. MLB baseball help saved by McGuire's homers, the steroid era brought millions of fans back to the game. The league when from extremely damaged by the strike and missed world series, to record attendance, almost 100 percent because of performance enhancing drugs, and now people are treating these guys like heroes and giving Selig et all a pass. If you don't let McGuire into the hall of fame, you better strip frank robinson of his HOF status, and ban selig for life too.
JoeyJoJo
QUOTE (3A @ Tuesday, January 12th, 2010, 10:07 AM) *
Well let's use current HOF inductions as a gold standard. Were there any players who used illegal drugs in the HOF? Well 1919-1933 was the prohibition, at which point alchohol was illegal. In 1919 a young man by the name of Babe Ruth was sold to the New York Yankees. Babe Ruth very publically at times was disobeying this current illegal drug law.

I by no means want to say McGwire is anywhere close to Ruth on talent level or leaving his mark on the record books, however by letter of the rules "This prohibition applies to all illegal drugs."

I was merely responding to the common misconception that steroids weren't against the rules.
Mills
The fact that MM can say that the roids did'nt give him an edge is so incrediblly insulting. it made me wonder why he even did this interview in the first place? If he wasn't ready to come clean then why bother? I'm sorry, but you will have a tough time convincing me that he actually believes this. He slugged 750 in 98... that does not happen.

If he's going to continue to lie, i'm going to continue calling him an a-hole
3A
QUOTE (Mills @ Tuesday, January 12th, 2010, 11:01 AM) *
The fact that MM can say that the roids did'nt give him an edge is so incrediblly insulting. it made me wonder why he even did this interview in the first place? If he wasn't ready to come clean then why bother? I'm sorry, but you will have a tough time convincing me that he actually believes this. He slugged 750 in 98... that does not happen.

If he's going to continue to lie, i'm going to continue calling him an a-hole


http://www.baseball-almanac.com/hitting/hislug2.shtml

750+ can happen, do I believe roids helped Big Mac? Yes. How much? Who knows for sure 25 points? which would be roughly 1 extra HR every 42 ABs. That would quantify his 70 HR's in 509 AB's down to 58HRs. (509/42 = 12.12)

Lets expand on that since Big Mac addmittedly said throughout the 90's Total HRs = 405HR's 90's Total AB's = 4002 (1 per 9.88 AB's)
Prior to the 90's 1986-1989 Total HR's 117 Total AB's = 1650 (1 per 14.10 AB's)
Last 2 seasons no official acceptance or denial of steriods Total HR's 61 Total AB's 535 (1 HR per 8.77 AB's)
Career Totals 6187 AB's 583 HR's (1HR per 10.61 AB's)

Lets say we prorate his HR totals to the beginning of his career numbers at 1HR per 14.1 ABs, He does make it to 438 HR's or tied with Andre Dawson for what would be 35th overall.

(This post is merely showing that it is possibly to reach .750 SLG and also an alternative to a possible prorated change to his stats, which is still phenomenal.)
DrawingDeadInDM
The steroids didn't help him hit home runs.. they just kept him healthy so he could hit more of 'em.

Oh, okay.
king_tanner
QUOTE (Pot Odds RAC @ Tuesday, January 12th, 2010, 9:31 AM) *
What rule did he break? Were Steroids and HGH against the rules back then? I honestly don't know. Everyone calls him a "cheater" but were his actions actually cheating?


Regardless if the MLB allowed it, last time I checked steroids were against the law unless used for medical reasons.

I agree that MLB is corrupt and are responsible for this, but I can't let McGuire off the hook. When I first started watching baseball I was a huge fan of McGuire and Canseco (Oak fan obv), and now I have a deep hatred for them. Giambi and Tejada also.

There is scientific evidence that I won't look up and find links to, but I know it is out there that shows that steroids do without a doubt help players hit home runs. McGuire is either stupid not to believe that steroids helped him hit home runs, or he thinks the public is stupid enough to believe him.

I think it sucks that a team hired him.

The steroid problem is not close to being over. I still think players take stuff that are undetectable. I also think athletes in other sports are still doing this as well. Last year Manny got caught, also the whole ARod stuff with him saying he did not take steroids and he got caught in a lie. All of major league baseball is shady in my opinion, I can't trust anyone with all these players lying out of their teeth.
Pot Odds RAC
QUOTE (king_tanner @ Tuesday, January 12th, 2010, 6:16 PM) *
Regardless if the MLB allowed it, last time I checked steroids were against the law unless used for medical reasons.

I agree that MLB is corrupt and are responsible for this, but I can't let McGuire off the hook. When I first started watching baseball I was a huge fan of McGuire and Canseco (Oak fan obv), and now I have a deep hatred for them. Giambi and Tejada also.

There is scientific evidence that I won't look up and find links to, but I know it is out there that shows that steroids do without a doubt help players hit home runs. McGuire is either stupid not to believe that steroids helped him hit home runs, or he thinks the public is stupid enough to believe him.

I think it sucks that a team hired him.

The steroid problem is not close to being over. I still think players take stuff that are undetectable. I also think athletes in other sports are still doing this as well. Last year Manny got caught, also the whole ARod stuff with him saying he did not take steroids and he got caught in a lie. All of major league baseball is shady in my opinion, I can't trust anyone with all these players lying out of their teeth.

Being a bit of a Devil's Advocate here...

...why are steroids such an issue to you? Why is this such a betrayal to you? Ultimately they are only hurting themselves. Yeah, "Bad message to kids.. blah... blah... blah..." but you "hate" them for their performance enhancing drug usage? They are going to extreme measures to be the best athlete they can be - to the point of knowingly exposing themselves to proven risks of life shortening diseases. It seems like people are getting twisted up partly because the media are making a frenzy out of it. The same media who ignored the story when it was actually happening.

Interesting article which I will quote a portion:
QUOTE
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writ....html?eref=sihp

There's another thing, something you don't hear people talk about much. In fact, my old friend Buck O'Neil was about the only person I ever heard talk openly about this. Buck would get infuriated because people constantly talked about the "benefits" of using steroids to the exclusion of almost everything else. He'd say something like: "Well, people talk all the time about how they will help you hit the ball farther and pitch the ball faster. Why don't they talk instead about how you might die young? Why don't they talk about how you might not be able to have children? Why are they always telling children: 'Use this and it will make you a great baseball player... but you shouldn't use it?'"

His point was, yes, that we in the media -- especially some of the angriest anti-steroid crusaders -- GLORIFY steroids. We talk about the amazing feats of strength possible with steroids. We talk about how steroids can turn a mere mortal into a legend. We talk about how despite all the rewards -- and those rewards may include fame and riches beyond your wildest dreams -- you shouldn't do it because, you know, it's wrong and cheating and all that. This isn't exactly an overpowering message to the youth of America, is it? McGwire's message was: "Hey, it's a dead end and it doesn't even help you that much." And people skewer him for it?


Yeah, his admission is a bit short on sincerity given the timing and since he still claims that Steroids didn't enhance his performance. Then why take them?!? But people have been skewering him since his non-testimony to Congress. Now they nail him when he actually finally admits to Steroid and HGH use. The Congress inquiry was a joke, and things are way more complicated than to think you put a guy in front of Congress with a microphone in his face and expect him to embarrass and incriminate himself. I don't know.
king_tanner
QUOTE (Pot Odds RAC @ Wednesday, January 13th, 2010, 6:06 AM) *
Being a bit of a Devil's Advocate here...

...why are steroids such an issue to you? Why is this such a betrayal to you? Ultimately they are only hurting themselves. Yeah, "Bad message to kids.. blah... blah... blah..." but you "hate" them for their performance enhancing drug usage? They are going to extreme measures to be the best athlete they can be - to the point of knowingly exposing themselves to proven risks of life shortening diseases. It seems like people are getting twisted up partly because the media are making a frenzy out of it. The same media who ignored the story when it was actually happening.


First off they were able to make millions upon millions that they do not have to give back because they cheated. 2nd off they are lying. McGwire is lying (Canseco said he would go up against a lie detector at any time). Pretty much all the high profile guys have lied. They are supposed to be role models to kids and they lie in front of the public on a daily basis.

2nd off, you don't feel betrayed by the McGwire Sosa year that put baseball back on the map? Yeah that whole thing was a farce. I consider that year a fantasy tale, could be written as a book, but to me all of that should be erased from MLB history.

Barry Bonds' records... all a lie.

Yeah I feel betrayed. I'm a baseball fan, MLB and these guys turned the sport into a joke.

People have a right to "skewer" McGwire after his admission. You know why? Because he is still lying. He admitted to taking steroids, great. He is still saying that steroids did not help him hit the ball harder. He is still saying calling Canseco a liar (just like everyone else in the Congress hearing who have since been caught). The guy is still full of shit. I have no sympathy for him. The guy shouldn't be allowed anywhere near a baseball team until he can stop bullshitting everyone.
Swift_Psycho
QUOTE (king_tanner @ Wednesday, January 13th, 2010, 11:40 AM) *
First off they were able to make millions upon millions that they do not have to give back because they cheated. 2nd off they are lying. McGwire is lying (Canseco said he would go up against a lie detector at any time). Pretty much all the high profile guys have lied. They are supposed to be role models to kids and they lie in front of the public on a daily basis.

2nd off, you don't feel betrayed by the McGwire Sosa year that put baseball back on the map? Yeah that whole thing was a farce. I consider that year a fantasy tale, could be written as a book, but to me all of that should be erased from MLB history.

Barry Bonds' records... all a lie.


In the interest of consistency, do you also believe anyone who used amphetamines back in the 60s and 70s should be taken out of the record books and be out of the HOF as well?
king_tanner
QUOTE (Swift_Psycho @ Wednesday, January 13th, 2010, 9:46 AM) *
In the interest of consistency, do you also believe anyone who used amphetamines back in the 60s and 70s should be taken out of the record books and be out of the HOF as well?


If there is concrete evidence of anyone using performance enhancing drugs they should be left out.

Also, did Tony LaRussa really say that he had no idea McGwire was on steroids, or am I just batshit crazy?
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (king_tanner @ Wednesday, January 13th, 2010, 1:18 PM) *
If there is concrete evidence of anyone using performance enhancing drugs they should be left out.



You realize who that means you're kicking out, right? Mickey Mantle, willie mays, all the guys of that era were popping greenies like m&m's.
king_tanner
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Wednesday, January 13th, 2010, 11:59 AM) *
You realize who that means you're kicking out, right? Mickey Mantle, willie mays, all the guys of that era were popping greenies like m&m's.


That doesn't make any of this ok. I think the sports media is smart enough not to let any of the steroid guys in (although they might vote Bonds in which suck). I'm definitely not worried about McGwire getting in.

Even if we were to consider McGwire for the hall because of how he was as a player. He wasn't a good fielder. His batting average wasn't good. All he did was hit home runs which was impacted by steroids. No way he should be in the hall, he wasn't that good.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.