Is the better to bet the flop or to check raise the original raiser when this happens?

My head just exploded.

There's nowhere NEAR enough information to get an answer.
Do you have a particular hand you're asking about?

Board texture/position/stack size/amount of players all factor into that decision.

I think there was a hand recently posted about a middle set.

You definitely don't want to get in the habit of only betting or only check/raising with certain hands. If you do, it's very exploitable.

In general, you want to check/raise in a position where you think someone's going to bet regardless of whether they hit a decent hand or not (i.e. heads-up pot against reasonably aggressive player, dry board in a three way-pot against a very aggressive player) and lead the rest of the time.

Thx. This helped more than the other responses. I was really just looking for a gen. response to a gen. question.

More info. for the other 2 posters in this thread:

I had 10 10 x x in the blinds at 25 cent/50 cent PLO 6 max.

EP raises pot, I call.

The flop is Q 10 x with 2 clubs. I check pretty much knowing that he is going to bet pot.

He bets pot, I check raise him pot. He tanks and then shoves, I pretty much snap call with my second nuts. If he has QQ, oh well.

Now, the only reason I thought betting pot first instead of check raising, is that I can control the pot size better because I have no draws. If another club comes on the turn, I check fold possibly depending on the amount bet by villian.

Ok, I'm a newb at PLO, so if my thinking is messed up, that's why.