Cappy37
Sunday, June 8th, 2008, 10:19 PM
And since I love rambling late at night, let me add this:
Jm, trust in yourself. I play my style (drunken monkey is my best description), Anti plays his style, BDC plays his style, etc...
My style won't work for your game. Anti's style won't work for your game.
The reason I single you out and give complex thought processes isn't because I feel you need "instruction" or (god no) "correction", I'm just trying to convey how I think about situations and hands.
Understanding multiple ways to look at each scenario is one of the most important concepts of poker. Understanding why opponents do what they do is the key to taking their money in the long run.
Mr. Checky McFold, who falls somewhere between a loving guru and the drunken uncle at family gatherings who tells you your a f*ckup and will never amount to anything, used to give spot on advice in the mixed game strat section daily...
on how he'd play a hand.
Based on his style, his table image, his courage, and his bankroll. He's an absolute genius in all the games, and boy do I wish he'd wander into this thread and put a boot in my a$$ and explain to me why I'm an idiot.
At first I dismissed a lot of his advice as "I ain't playing like Checky. I'm no maniac". And I kept breaking even, or booking small wins. Then I moved to the darkside and unleashed my inner Tasmanian Devil. Now I book big wins (and losses, of course!) And I've finally grown to be comfortable in my shoes: No matter how uncomfortable I am at times with my style, I know for a fact that poor sap in the pot against me is 10x as uncomfortable unless he's holding the nuts, or mutliple draws to it.
Doyle's strategy of taking their money when they surrender it to you, and then "gambling" with them with "their" money is simply the smartest way to play poker. When it fails, it hurts like a mutha. When it succeeds, its unbelievably profitable. People don't want to get involved marginally in pots with you, and the blinds don't have position on you.
We are all dealt the same crappy hands, same good hands, etc. It all breaks even, minus the rake. You need to be earning money without a hand, you need to be saving money with the second best hand and no real draws. And you'll never be successful in poker if you need to hit flops to win money. It's not video poker. You take their money. You miss the flop, they miss the flop. You bet. They fold. You miss the flop they miss the flop. You check, they bet, you raise, they call. You fire a turn blank (hi card/ board pair, etc) OOP, and they fold quickly. It's that easy at times.
Next time you are on the CO with A348 and a player limps in from MP, realize that you are about to enter a pot with little to no chance to win the high half, and you will need 60% of the board to cooperate, and probably with a deuece, to even get half. Unless you go nuts. Playing cautiously might win you half. Playing maniacally can win you a lot. Raising in position allows you to inflate the pot with a good hand, and allows you either a free turn card, or the knowledge that someone is ready to bet into a PF agressor. And if you are re-raised PF, be ready to outdraw Aces.

Aight, I sleep now.
If you are wondering who's smarter, me or Antistuff, remember this: he gets rakeback (tilt), I don't (Stars). Stop wondering there.