Dratj
Thursday, July 23rd, 2009, 7:13 PM
QUOTE (Randy Reed @ Thursday, July 23rd, 2009, 4:56 PM)

Not to speak for MJ but he's not picking on you. He generally just makes short points without much regard to who posted it. I like that he does that. Don't take it personally, it wasn't meant to be.
fair enough, just seems like he likes to come in and make sarcastic comments at things I say, as i can see from his post he didn't mean it. It's just that it wasn't the first time.
QUOTE (GrinderMJ @ Thursday, July 23rd, 2009, 5:14 PM)

didn't really mean to be a dick, but i probably didn't really phrase my idea very well. I was just trying to say that nearly every style of martial arts probably strives to avoid taking damage. Also, chuck liddell's old style was pretty absurdly dominant, he took almost zero damage for multiple years BECAUSE his striking was so good, he avoided the ground game with an amazing sprawl and was always a counter puncher. He didn't put himself out there, he usually waited for his opponent to do that, so I think he's a bad example. As for Bisping Henderson, I think it was a perfectly fine way for Henderson to fight, although it didn't really matter what he did, he was 10x better at all aspects of mma. However, Bisping's game plan of sticking his chin out vs. a dude who knocked out prime wanderlei Silva was not very goot.
edit: and ya i agree that gsp's style is such that he'll probably not lose a fight at 170 for a really long time unless he gets flash ko'ed or something.
Alright, glad you didn't mean to be a dick.
See, the above was a much better way to put it. I agree with most of what you say.
I still think the stand up punching it out style is not that great because you are more vulnerable to getting clipped vs. taking a guy down first then raining down punches or staying at a distance and kicking a guy so he can't knock you out because he's on the defensive. Of course anything can happen but if you are in close or far away, it's much harder for your opponent to knock you out. I think to have longevity in mma, it's important that you get hit as little as possible. Concussions definitely take their toll.
Chuck was one of the best but he's put himself out there to get knocked out and has been knocked out. It's the risk of his style of fighting.
QUOTE (gooch @ Thursday, July 23rd, 2009, 6:14 PM)

chuck "boxed" mma style against guys who thought you could go toe to toe with him "boxing" style
the gloves are smaller so you are vulnerable to more punches in mma and traditional boxing defence doesn't work, sitting back and being a good counter puncher with good lateral movement is great in mma if the guy is just coming right at you
look at how bad joe stevenson does in the striking because he sticks to a straight boxing style
same reason guys like jardine were getting wins, either really good or really bad
Machida would kill Jardine and any guy whose main weapon is punching. They would never get close enough to hit him as he rains down kicks on them.
Basically, imo, GSP's and Machida's fighting styles are the future of ufc. Guys that want to be champ will have to adopt more of their style. Those 2 guys will retain their titles for a long time.
Alright, I think I've beaten this topic to death.
on another note, Silva or Griffin at ufc 100?
I think Silva will easily defeat Griffin.