bdc30
Monday, January 28th, 2008, 1:25 PM
QUOTE (jmbreslin @ Monday, January 28th, 2008, 4:08 PM)

Wow, fascinating explanation, thanks. So even though you were likely behind on the flop, you were willing to put all your money in because you had enough outs to a winning hand because both villains were likely drawing to the outs in one another's hand. Did I understand your explanation correctly?
I'm still a bit suspicious about the PF raise. Everything I've read about Omaha strategy says to avoid raising OOP because position is so valuable in this game - more often than not you'll end up giving away your hand OOP by having to CB to either protect what you hit or check to give up on the hand. Do you disagree with this strategy?
Yep, that's pretty much the gist of it -- I'm NEVER ahead on the flop (in terms of hand rank), but as shown, my equity in the pot was higher than both other hands I was up against. Like I said as well, I was hoping to sack BB out of the hand, since he'd looked pretty weak with the flat call preflop and the check/call ON the flop, and the extra $18 he'd put in to that point would have given me more than enough value in the hand.
Simo can probably talk more about the values of raising preflop in this game. UTG however in a 6-max game is similar to MP in full-ring, if you think about it. You're only 2 or 3 spots off the button at most. A good early position raise will usually push out a few players behind you, thus getting you position on the blinds if they call (which they often do because they think they're "priced in") I'll raise 10x more from UTG than I will from the blinds.