psujohn
Friday, January 11th, 2008, 12:45 PM
PT has villain as semi-loose/neutral. Something like 35/5/2 (from memory). My read is that he's bad. Don't have enough to know in what ways he's bad but he's certainly not good.
PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $0.50 BB (6 handed)
Poker Stars Converter Tool from
FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FCP)
Hero ($100.50)
SB ($35)
Preflop: Hero is Button with A

, 6

.
3 folds,
Hero raises to $2, SB calls $1.75,
1 fold.
Flop: ($4.50) 6

, 9

, K
(2 players)SB checks, Hero checks.
Turn: ($4.50) K
(2 players)SB bets $1, Hero calls $1.
River: ($6.50) 6
(2 players)SB checks,
Hero bets $3,
SB raises to $32, Hero
On the river I think villain bets if he has a K in his hand so I value bet. He can easily have a 9 or TT or A high hand that he'll pay off with. Once he shoves I'm afraid that my best case scenario is a chop.
krup24
Friday, January 11th, 2008, 12:50 PM
why did you check the flop?
i definitely fold river as played having only invested $6
psujohn
Friday, January 11th, 2008, 12:58 PM
The flop check was probably bad. I had been c-betting very frequently so villain should expect a c-bet if he's paying any attention. I figured he's calling with nearly anything if I c-bet the flop and so I could see what the turn brought and re-evaluate.
mtdesmoines
Friday, January 11th, 2008, 12:58 PM
QUOTE (psujohn @ Friday, January 11th, 2008, 12:45 PM)

PT has villain as semi-loose/neutral. Something like 35/5/2 (from memory). My read is that he's bad. Don't have enough to know in what ways he's bad but he's certainly not good.
Hero ($100.50)
SB ($35)
Preflop: Hero is Button with A

, 6

.
3 folds,
Hero raises to $2, SB calls $1.75,
1 fold.
Flop: ($4.50) 6

, 9

, K
(2 players)SB checks, Hero checks.
Turn: ($4.50) K
(2 players)SB bets $1, Hero calls $1.
River: ($6.50) 6
(2 players)SB checks,
Hero bets $3,
SB raises to $32, Hero
On the river I think villain bets if he has a K in his hand so I value bet. He can easily have a 9 or TT or A high hand that he'll pay off with. Once he shoves I'm afraid that my best case scenario is a chop.
I timebank/fold/call depending on read.
krup24
Friday, January 11th, 2008, 1:00 PM
QUOTE (psujohn @ Friday, January 11th, 2008, 3:58 PM)

The flop check was probably bad. I had been c-betting very frequently so villain should expect a c-bet if he's paying any attention. I figured he's calling with nearly anything if I c-bet the flop and so I could see what the turn brought and re-evaluate.
continue to punish him with the C-bet imo. if he calls the c-bet then you can check behind the turn.
Money022
Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 8:56 AM
What do you expect to get called by when betting the river? It's a stretch to think he's going to call with JJ/TT or A high. I don't like opening up the betting with a hand that has no value if raised when it's unlikely a weaker hand calls a value bet anyways.
Syntonic
Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 11:04 AM
QUOTE (Money022 @ Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 9:56 AM)

What do you expect to get called by when betting the river? It's a stretch to think he's going to call with JJ/TT or A high. I don't like opening up the betting with a hand that has no value if raised when it's unlikely a weaker hand calls a value bet anyways.
Meh, a 9 with a decent kicker would call here.
I definitely fold this though. I guess it depends how well you know the villain, but I would play a K the same way out of position.
mikeysong
Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 11:09 AM
this is a fold a lot however your check certainly doesn't represent a king. if he's bluffy or capable of reading hands then this would be a call.
Sheiky
Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 11:25 AM
I kind of like the way you played the hand, i think it's a fold on the river, though it's close.
David_Nicoson
Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 11:35 AM
I agree with Krup; bet the flop.
psujohn
Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 8:00 PM
QUOTE (Money022 @ Saturday, January 12th, 2008, 11:56 AM)

What do you expect to get called by when betting the river? It's a stretch to think he's going to call with JJ/TT or A high. I don't like opening up the betting with a hand that has no value if raised when it's unlikely a weaker hand calls a value bet anyways.
The only time I gave a thought to checking behind is when I get repoped big. Villain is bad. He calls here with nearly his entire range that's gotten to this point. He's also not particularly agg and hasn't shown any fancy plays. I think the c/r is bizarre since there is no reason for villain to think I'd bet this river. A c/r by villain with a K here is horrible. But we've established that he's bad.
I folded but I think I probably folded the best hand or a chop at worst. Still given the bet size vs the pot size I think the fold is ok.
ROBBBIGG
Monday, January 14th, 2008, 1:27 AM
I'm not happy to have to do it, but I'm calling here so often. It's not because I have a full house, it's because of the story villain is telling. The check on flop is fine, but he bets 1/4 pot on turn he hits trips with? Ok, maybe villain likes to be tricky, but now he's checkraising like 3-4x the pot? That's not tricky and trying to get value from your underfull, that's stupid and bluffy.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.