Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Michigan Wolverines
FCP Poker Forum > Off Topic Forums > Sports- Football
Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (CaneBrain @ Sunday, October 25th, 2009, 8:08 AM) *
Not a pretty game but congrats to Iowa. 8-0 for the first time.


Jesus, they were hitting hard out there.. Very, very excited win. Wasn't pretty, that's for sure.. but it's huge.
DrawingDeadInDM
Good run while it lasted.

I'm feeling physically ill.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Saturday, November 7th, 2009, 12:17 PM) *
Good run while it lasted.

I'm feeling physically ill.



Mah na Mah na ( do do, da do do)

DrawingDeadInDM
I knew you'd have something to say, being a Northwestern fan.. but, congrats. Any one of those three pass interference/defensive holding calls would've been nice..but, whatever. We've lived a charmed season up until this point and can't hardly complain about not getting a break.

Not much you can do. Lost our top two RBs, lost one of our best OL, lost a starting CB and a starting safety. Now we lost our QB.

Good run, but it's over now. Still control our own destiny as far as the Rose Bowl, though. Never really felt like this after a sporting event.. pretty awful.
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Saturday, November 7th, 2009, 2:04 PM) *
I knew you'd have something to say, being a Northwestern fan.. but, congrats. Any one of those three pass interference/defensive holding calls would've been nice..but, whatever. We've lived a charmed season up until this point and can't hardly complain about not getting a break.

Not much you can do. Lost our top two RBs, lost one of our best OL, lost a starting CB and a starting safety. Now we lost our QB.

Good run, but it's over now. Still control our own destiny as far as the Rose Bowl, though. Never really felt like this after a sporting event.. pretty awful.



Alumnus. I'm a Nebraska fan, I'm an NU alumnus, and any win they have is just gravy. I don't think Northwestern really has fans, just alumni. Everyone in chicago roots for Norte Dame, Michigan or Wisconsin. It's really odd how much of Iowa's number NU's had over the past few years. With Kafka hurt, I didn't think NU had much chance of winning this game at all.
fryer98
I'm pretty sure the last time Purdue beat OSU and UM in the same season (and maybe the only time ever?) was the 2000 Rose Bowl year.

So, we got that goin' for us, which is nice.
BigDMcGee
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA oh Michigan. You have to beat OSU just to make a bowl. Pzowned.
vbnautilus
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Saturday, November 14th, 2009, 4:46 PM) *
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA oh Michigan. You have to beat OSU just to make a bowl. Pzowned.


Yeah it's pretty sad.

On the other hand, this situation would make a win next week one of the greatest michigan victories ever.
Jadaki
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Saturday, November 14th, 2009, 6:46 PM) *
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHA oh Michigan. You have to beat OSU just to make a bowl. Pzowned.


Michigans spread offense vs OSU's stout D, and OSU's inept offense against Michigan's joke of a defense. There is potential for a good game.

Gross part is Michigan is one or two plays away from winning 3 of the last 5 games, sooo sad.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Monday, October 12th, 2009, 10:33 AM) *
If you think Iowa can walk into OSU and win, I'm willing to bet that game straight up right now. You probably don't want to do that with me though, some OSU fans might actually give you points. I like Michigan's chances of beating them better than Iowa's.

We can do a prop bet though. Point spread of the Michigan/OSU game vs the point spread of the Iowa/OSU game. If one of our teams win and the other loses vs OSU, that determines the winner. however if both lose or both win, its decided by who won by more or lost by less. We can just do something fun like signatures for a week or something.

You down?


Don't worry, I didn't forget about our prop bet.
Jadaki
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Saturday, November 28th, 2009, 11:22 AM) *
Don't worry, I didn't forget about our prop bet.


Your awfully slow about it, considering you were supposed to have the stuff for me right after the game. I had yours prepared, sort of.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Saturday, November 28th, 2009, 10:32 AM) *
Your awfully slow about it, considering you were supposed to have the stuff for me right after the game. I had yours prepared, sort of.


You're.

And if me not having it immediately after the game(though I must have missed that contigency) nullifies our bet, then whatever.
Jadaki
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Saturday, November 28th, 2009, 12:41 PM) *
You're.

And if me not having it immediately after the game(though I must have missed that contigency) nullifies our bet, then whatever.


You said it was supposed to start the night after the Mich/OSU game, but to be fair I haven't been around much so I'm good on waiting on you too finish it up. I got a kick out of the signature but the clown pic doesn't appear to want to work because of how big it is, better send a new one.
DrawingDeadInDM
Brandon Graham and Daryll Clark split the Silver football award.. what?

Brandon Graham wasn't even the best defensive player in the Big Ten. Clark, sure..okay, whatever..but Graham? Really?

Weird year in the Big Ten.
Jadaki
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Tuesday, December 8th, 2009, 10:24 PM) *
Brandon Graham and Daryll Clark split the Silver football award.. what?

Brandon Graham wasn't even the best defensive player in the Big Ten. Clark, sure..okay, whatever..but Graham? Really?

Weird year in the Big Ten.


pretty sure every NFL scout disagrees with you. Graham is going to be a high first round pick.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Monday, December 14th, 2009, 1:05 AM) *
pretty sure every NFL scout disagrees with you. Graham is going to be a high first round pick.


Not sure what his draft status has to do with him being the best player in the league.

The LB from MSU, the DE Schofield from Wisconsin, Odrick and Bowman from PSU were all better players, IMO.

And Bryan Bulaga, the OT from Iowa, is projected higher than Graham, so if that's your measuring stick, then Bulaga should've won the Silver Football. .
Jadaki
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Monday, December 14th, 2009, 1:06 PM) *
Not sure what his draft status has to do with him being the best player in the league.

The LB from MSU, the DE Schofield from Wisconsin, Odrick and Bowman from PSU were all better players, IMO.

And Bryan Bulaga, the OT from Iowa, is projected higher than Graham, so if that's your measuring stick, then Bulaga should've won the Silver Football. .


Usually the better of a player you are the higher you get drafted.

Michigan's defense was pretty shitty all year, when it got stops its because BG would make 3 huge plays in a row. He singlehandedly kept them in some games when the rest of the defense was giving up huge plays. He pulled a goal line stand vs OSU where he by himself stuffed the run for loss twice then chased down Pryor and sacked him for three straight plays that were losses. There isn't another defensive player in the big ten that could have done that.

DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Sunday, December 20th, 2009, 12:14 AM) *
Usually the better of a player you are the higher you get drafted.

Michigan's defense was pretty shitty all year, when it got stops its because BG would make 3 huge plays in a row. He singlehandedly kept them in some games when the rest of the defense was giving up huge plays. He pulled a goal line stand vs OSU where he by himself stuffed the run for loss twice then chased down Pryor and sacked him for three straight plays that were losses. There isn't another defensive player in the big ten that could have done that.


Draft status has zero to do with college accomplishments..ask Eric Crouch or Josh Heupel.

Anyway..

So, we're rewarding him because the rest of his team is junk? Also, Navorro Bowman, Greg Jones, Sean Lee and Pat Angerer are all as productive or more productive.

And that's just talking about linebackers. He's a great player, no doubt.. but he's not the best player in the Big Ten.

And if he's better than the LB from MSU, why isn't he on anyone's All American list when Jones is? Angerer even made a few 2nd teams.
TRB05
QUOTE (Fekexelecem @ Sunday, December 20th, 2009, 2:26 AM) *
Good for Michigan. Robinson was a good coach in Denver and never really figured it out in Syracuse. He was one of the first for Shanny to start laying the blame on when his team under-achieved.


I think Denver's D was good in spite of Robinson. Everywhere he's gone since he's left worse than when he got there. The Chiefs Defense under Robinson was dreadful. They did not force a single punt in a playoff game in 2003 at home!



Yes, I am bitter. GL to Michigan though.
DrawingDeadInDM
Nice win for the Badgers and the Big Ten.
Jadaki
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Wednesday, December 30th, 2009, 3:18 AM) *
Nice win for the Badgers and the Big Ten.


It was a good win over a team that probably starts out top ten next year. The Miami market is blasting the Hurricanes for that game though, they are being pretty brutal.
Freddec
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Thursday, December 31st, 2009, 2:01 PM) *
It was a good win over a team that probably starts out top ten next year. The Miami market is blasting the Hurricanes for that game though, they are being pretty brutal.



Miami won't even win the pathetic ACC next year, book it..........
Freddec
Orlando should lose the citrus bowl for allowing teh field to get in this kind of shape. Its almost too dangerous for the players to run on imo. Any speed advantage a player has is gone too
Jadaki
Did the Big-10 just go 4-0 in it's top bowl games? I guess so...

QUOTE
Penn State, Iowa, Ohio State and Wisconsin all defeated teams that were supposedly faster and more athletic. They were the myth busters of the BCS, scoffing at the "power vs. speed" plotlines. Georgia Tech and Oregon had the sexy offenses, but the Big Ten teams won with the time-tested formulas of defense, special teams and just enough offense.


Wins over LSU, Oregon, GT and Miami all ranked in the top 15. 2-0 in BCS bowls...
Freddec
quality wins over LSU and Oregon.......the other two are in the ACC though so....ya know


but yeah, good bowl year for the Big 10 fwiw
KowboyKoop
Roll ****ing Tide!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
KowboyKoop
Did Alabama just win the SEC's fourth national title in a row!??! I THINK SO!

SUCK IT SUCK IT SUCK IT SUCK IT SEE YOU NEXT YEAR GOOD LUCK WITH MICHIGAN WINNING FIVE GAMES NEXT YEAR.
JoeyJoJo
I feel sorry for you.
CaneBrain
QUOTE (Freddec @ Wednesday, January 6th, 2010, 3:37 PM) *
quality wins over LSU and Oregon.......the other two are in the ACC though so....ya know


but yeah, good bowl year for the Big 10 fwiw



you talk a lot of crap for a guy who roots for one of all time/classic underachieving programs.

BigDMcGee
HAI GUYS! What's going on in here?



Jadaki
QUOTE (BigDMcGee @ Thursday, June 10th, 2010, 12:30 PM) *
HAI GUYS! What's going on in here?



http://i46.tinypic.com/2rymz53.gif
BigDMcGee
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Saturday, June 12th, 2010, 3:36 PM) *



DrawingDeadInDM
Iowa and Ohio State in BCS Bowls this year. Indiana will surprise, IMO.. 7-9 wins. Michigan will still be garbage. Bring on Nebraska.

Holler.
SuitedAces21
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Monday, August 9th, 2010, 4:11 PM) *
Bring on Nebraska.


be careful what you wish for.
Jadaki
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Monday, August 9th, 2010, 4:11 PM) *
Iowa and Ohio State in BCS Bowls this year. Indiana will surprise, IMO.. 7-9 wins. Michigan will still be garbage. Bring on Nebraska.

Holler.



OSU and no one else. Iowa isn't going to live up to expectations, they "ran good" last year scraping out a lot of really close wins. They eat the other side of variance this year.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Tuesday, August 10th, 2010, 5:33 PM) *
OSU and no one else. Iowa isn't going to live up to expectations, they "ran good" last year scraping out a lot of really close wins. They eat the other side of variance this year.


So, last year wasnt making up for '08 when they lost 4 games by 12 points? Ahhh, who am I kidding? They did run good. They bring so much back, though..and all the tough games are at home.. and just, ahhh.. I mean, 10+ wins would be awesome, but.. man.. anyway..

So.. Denard or Tate?
Jadaki
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Wednesday, August 11th, 2010, 3:33 AM) *
So.. Denard or Tate?


No idea.

I hear the team is behind Denard because he put in more time in the off season. He was soooo inaccurate with his passing last year that scares me. I wouldn't be surprised if they split time.
vbnautilus
QUOTE (Jadaki @ Saturday, August 14th, 2010, 12:21 AM) *
No idea.

I hear the team is behind Denard because he put in more time in the off season. He was soooo inaccurate with his passing last year that scares me. I wouldn't be surprised if they split time.


Yeah, last year I was scared every time he passed. But if he actually has improved... would be great.

Jadaki
ESPN's 20 teams with the best shot at getting to the title game

Interesting list, which should make DDiDM happy....

1. Iowa
2. Oregon
3. OSU
4. Alabama
5. Oklahoma
vbnautilus
Great game this weekend. I feel like we finally got to see what Rodriguez has wanted the team to look like.

I just hope it wasn't a fluke.
Tactical Bear
QUOTE (vbnautilus @ Sunday, September 5th, 2010, 4:39 PM) *
Great game this weekend. I feel like we finally got to see what Rodriguez has wanted the team to look like.

I just hope it wasn't a fluke.


I think it's just as much a poor showing by UConn as it was a good showing by Michigan. That holds true on both sides of the ball, but especially when the Wolverines were on defense. Despite only scoring the 10 points, I think UConn moved the ball pretty effectively. UConn's passing game was incredibly erratic, but I couldn't help but think it had little to do with Michigan's pass rush/secondary. Even on defense, UConn just looked horrible. In part, I'm sure that was good scheming and Robinson being all fast and shifty as fuck, but it really looked like UConn's front 7 was just getting manhandled, and I really doubt that will be the case next week against Notre Dame.

But I'm a noted pessimist, and the early line on the Michgan at ND tilt -- it opened at 4.5, currently sits at 4.0, and looks, given the way it's priced, like it's more likely to fall to 3.5 than jump back to 4.5 -- is encouraging. Apparently, sharps think Michigan is pretty close in terms of talent to Notre Dame (homefield in college is generally worth 3 or 3.5 points, meaning on a neutral site, the game would be set at Notre Dame-1.5 or so), which is very good news. I think if the line had been set in the preseason, it would have been Notre Dame -7.5, give or take a half-point. At this point, the books have Michigan winning this game over 1/3 of the time, which I would have taken in a heartbeat as Michigan fan on August 1st.

Go Blue.
vbnautilus
Yeah, our defense really scares me. I am assuming the gameplan is to just run the score up enough on offense to overcome the free scoring the other team will be granted.
Tactical Bear
Michgan/Notre Dame down to ND-3.5 across the board. I'd be shocked if it dipped to 3.0, but 3.5 is still pretty good news. Based on the moneylines floating around, it looks like Michigan can be expected to win this game a shade less than 38% of the time. I still like ND-3.5 and would take them at anything better than -180 on the ML, but this is still great news for Michigan fans.

Let's just hope it's not Notre Dame backlash moving the line.
Ottawa_Biatch
QUOTE (Tactical Bear @ Tuesday, September 7th, 2010, 3:54 PM) *
Michgan/Notre Dame down to ND-3.5 across the board. I'd be shocked if it dipped to 3.0, but 3.5 is still pretty good news. Based on the moneylines floating around, it looks like Michigan can be expected to win this game a shade less than 38% of the time. I still like ND-3.5 and would take them at anything better than -180 on the ML, but this is still great news for Michigan fans.

Let's just hope it's not Notre Dame backlash moving the line.


Hey, I'm feeling like taking ND and the points too. I see almost 89% of the public on Michigan right now. But it scares me that you say the sharps are on Michigan as well. Do you think it makes more sense to take -3.5 right now for ND, or does it make more sense to wait to see if gets brought down to 3.0? Or do you think there's a better chance it goes up to -4.0?
Tactical Bear
QUOTE (Ottawa_Biatch @ Tuesday, September 7th, 2010, 10:48 PM) *
Hey, I'm feeling like taking ND and the points too. I see almost 89% of the public on Michigan right now. But it scares me that you say the sharps are on Michigan as well. Do you think it makes more sense to take -3.5 right now for ND, or does it make more sense to wait to see if gets brought down to 3.0? Or do you think there's a better chance it goes up to -4.0?


Not sure. I think it's unlikely it gets as low as 3.0, but the difference between 3.0 and 3.5 is muuuuch bigger than the difference between 3.5 and 4.0, so buy at your own risk. My gut says 3.5 will be a good number come post time, but I'd at least wait until Friday night or Saturday morning before I move. ESPN Scouts Inc just posted something about Michigan covering the number, and I'd bet we see more of that before kickoff.

I just checked, and it looks like it's back up to 4.0 most places. Pinny's got it at UM+3.5 -104 ND-3.5-106. It looks to me like the line is going to settle around 3.75, so if you can get 3.5, you're probably safe taking it. If it gets as low as 3.0, most of the sharps who bought at 4.5 or higher are going to buy back, so there's little chance the equilibrium is going to set anywhere below 3.5
Mercury69
UConn...not exactly known as a football powerhouse. Is it any wonder Michigan beat them? They don't even seem to be ranked and the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten or the PAC Ten...(except for WV)

The Buckeyes are going to creampie the rest of the division, including the Hawkeyes.

So there.
DrawingDeadInDM
QUOTE (Mercury69 @ Thursday, September 9th, 2010, 9:00 AM) *
UConn...not exactly known as a football powerhouse. Is it any wonder Michigan beat them? They don't even seem to be ranked and the Big East isn't exactly the Big Ten or the PAC Ten...(except for WV)

The Buckeyes are going to creampie the rest of the division, including the Hawkeyes.

So there.


Um, no.

On all accounts.
Mercury69
QUOTE (DrawingDeadInDM @ Thursday, September 9th, 2010, 1:08 PM) *
Um, no.

On all accounts.



Some dude on the Michigan team didn't even have to tie his shoes to beat the Huskies.

The only ranked team in the Big East is WV

UCONN may have only lost their 5 games last year by a combined 15 points, but how much does that mean in that conference?

Anyway, just busting nuts as this thread includes trash talking, but your reply is kind of sad. If UCONN wins the conference, I'll be pretty surprised.
SBriand
QUOTE (Mercury69 @ Thursday, September 9th, 2010, 2:13 PM) *
Some dude on the Michigan team didn't even have to tie his shoes to beat the Huskies.

The only ranked team in the Big East is WV

UCONN may have only lost their 5 games last year by a combined 15 points, but how much does that mean in that conference?

Anyway, just busting nuts as this thread includes trash talking, but your reply is kind of sad. If UCONN wins the conference, I'll be pretty surprised.


You need to bash on Iowa to make this post towards him work they way you want it too.

Like tell him that Spievey sucks!
Mercury69
QUOTE (SBriand @ Thursday, September 9th, 2010, 3:30 PM) *
You need to bash on Iowa to make this post towards him work they way you want it too.

Like tell him that Spievey sucks!



Gotcha


Amari? Isn't that a girl's name? And dosen't he play for the Lions, a girl team? And, hey, he was third in tackles for Iowa as a soph, which is pretty good, but that also means the Hawkeyes sucked tailpipe and had a leaky front line.

:-D
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2012 Invision Power Services, Inc.